The Change in Vaginal Axis on MRI After Uterus Preserving Laparoscopic Lateral Mesh Suspension

May 18, 2020 updated by: OZAN DOGAN, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
Laparoscopic lateral mesh suspension is emerged as a practical, safe and feasible alternative to sacropexy to treat female genital apical prolapse. Investigators hypothesized that uterus-preserving lateral suspension provides a better anatomical positioning.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Suspending the cervix to the bilateral abdominal wall through subperitoneal tunnels may properly mimic cardinal ligament and restore the normal vaginal axis. To prove the null hypothesis, it is planned to compare the vaginal axis on Magnetic Resonans Imaging taken preoperatively and postoperatively in patients who are scheduled for lateral mesh suspension for apical prolapse.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
21

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Hamidiye Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who are scheduled for lateral mesh suspension operation to treat apical prolapse.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female genital prolapse

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had pouch of Douglas obliteration
  • Patients with enterocele
  • Patients who have any congenital or acquired anatomic and reproductive anomaly

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Study
Patients who had the operation of "laparoscopic lateral mesh suspension" for apical prolapse will have magnetic resonance imaging preoperatively and at postoperative 6th month
Diagnostic test: Magnetic resonance imaging
MRI will be performed using a standard body spiral in the supine position with 5 mm section thickness, on the axial, coronal and sagittal planes and the diffusion weighted images acquired will be evaluated by a specialised radiologist who will be blind to the participants.
Control
Multiparous, sexually active participants who have grade 0 or 1 (asymptomatic if exists) prolapse will have magnetic resonance imaging as a control group
Diagnostic test: Magnetic resonance imaging
MRI will be performed using a standard body spiral in the supine position with 5 mm section thickness, on the axial, coronal and sagittal planes and the diffusion weighted images acquired will be evaluated by a specialised radiologist who will be blind to the participants.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vaginal axis
Time Frame: at 6th months after the operation

From the images obtained in the sagittal plane, the vagina, which will be observed as a high signal intensity linear structure in T2A images, and the levator plate extending as a flow-signal intensity flat structure in T1A images, will be evaluated.

The angles between the pubococcygeal line and lower vaginal segment (angle A), between the levator plate and the pubococcygeal (angle B) and between lower and upper vaginal segments (angle C) will be measured.
at 6th months after the operation
Vaginal distances
Time Frame: at 6th months after the operation
The distance between the posterior vaginal fornix and the midpoint of the anterior side of the 2nd vertebra will be measured in the mid-sagittal plane (PF-S2). The distance between the right spina ischiadica and right vaginal fornix (RSI-RF), and, the distance between the left spina ischiadica and left vaginal fornix (LSI-LF) will be measured on T2A images acquired in the axial plane.
at 6th months after the operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urge Symptoms
Time Frame: Evaluation at postoperative 6th month
Michigan Incontinence Severity Index (M-ISI) scale will be used to assess subjective outcome including urge symptoms. This scale has ten items, consisting of a total M-ISI domain (the sum of items 1-8) and a distinct Bother domain (the sum of items 9 and 10). The total M-ISI score consists of three subdomains (items 1-3 for stress urinary incontinence [SUI], items 4-6 for urge urinary incontinence [UUI], and items 7 and 8 for Pad usage [PU]. The responses for each item range from 0 to 4 on a Likert-type scale, with higher values representing greater symptoms and greater bother. Total domain and subdomain scores are obtained by simply adding the respective answers. The minimally important difference has been determined for the following domains/subdomains: total M-ISI (4 points), SUI (2 points), UUI (2 points), and PU (1 point).
Evaluation at postoperative 6th month
Prolapse symptoms
Time Frame: Evaluation at postoperative 6th month
The POP-SS consists of seven items, each with a 5-point Likert response set (0 = never, 1 = occasionally, 2 = sometimes, 3 = most of the time and 4 = all of the time). A total score (range 0-28) is calculated by summing the seven individual symptom responses to derive the POP-SS score. In addition, women indicate which one of the seven symptoms causes them most bother.
Evaluation at postoperative 6th month
Sexual functions
Time Frame: Evaluation at postoperative 6th month
The FSFI evaluates sexual functioning in women and comprises of 19 questions with different answer choice scales referring the sexual life in the previous 4 weeks. The answer choices in the FSFI carry a number of points and are summed to obtain six domain scores and an overall score. For the latter, there is a threshold at 26.55 which means tFhat all values below are classed as indicating female sexual dysfunction (FSD). The domain scores are obtained as the sum of points attributed to questions in that domain multiplied by the domain factor.
Evaluation at postoperative 6th month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Bartin State Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ozan Dogan, MD, Hamidiye Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 9, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 18, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 240918

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anatomical Pathological Condition

Clinical Trials on Magnetic resonance imaging

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings