Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework in Removable Partial Denture Regarding Retention
Evaluation of Retention of Partial Denture Made of Injection Molded PEEK Framework Versus Cobalt Chromium Framework in Mandibular Kennedy Class I Edentulous Cases
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: ahmed hefny zidan, master
- Phone Number: +201126534668
- Email: ahmedhefnyf@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Manial
-
Cairo, Manial, Egypt, 11311
- Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine Cairo University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- ADULT
- OLDER_ADULT
- CHILD
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- . kennedy class I edentulous subjects indicated for framework partial denture
Exclusion Criteria:
- Uncooperative patients and bad oral hygiene patients
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: peek framework Removable partial denture
polymer-based framework has recently been introduced which is made of polyetheretherketone polymer frame combined with acrylic resin denture teeth and a conventional acrylic resin denture base.
|
it is a polyetheretherketone polymer frame combined with acrylic resin denture teeth and a conventional acrylic resin denture base made by injecting technique and have several advantages regarding strength and esthetics
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: cobalt chromium framework Removable partial denture
it's the gold standard framework which has many benefits such as they are used in thin sections and are less bulky,provide high strength and stiffness,and some disadvantages include hypersensitivity,metal display and oral galvanism,
|
standard framework device
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Retention
Time Frame: change from baseline retention force after one month and after three months
|
retention force of RPD during attachment/detachment cycles measured by digital force meter device
|
change from baseline retention force after one month and after three months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CEBD-CU-2018-11-27
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.