Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Biting Force
Evaluation of Biting Force of Removable Partial Denture Made of Injection Molded PEEK Framework Versus Cobalt Chromium Framework in Mandibular Kennedy Class I Edentulous Cases
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Amr Ha Mohammed, master
- Phone Number: +201001600625
- Email: amr_hatim@yahoo.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt, 11311
- Faculty of oral and dental medincine Cairo university
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
-Kennedy class 1 partially edentulous subjects indicated for framework partial denture
Exclusion Criteria:
- Uncooperative patients
- Bad oral hygiene patients
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: PEEK framework partial dentures
High performance ketone polymers introduced lately.These polymer-based frameworks provide better esthetics, higher elasticity, lighter in weight, have low water sorption and solubility, and are easily repaired and reproduced.
|
Polymer-based framework recently introduced made of polyetheretherketone polymer frame combined with acrylic resin denture teeth and a conventional acrylic resin denture base.
|
|
Active Comparator: Cobalt-chromium framework partial dentures
it is considered the gold standard framework.
These frameworks are less bulky with high strength, conduct heat and electricity well, and have good durability.
some disadvantages include hypersensitivity, adverse tissue reactions and bad aesthetics.
|
It's a bio-compatible metal used in thin sections so less bulky, provide high strength and stiffness ,conduct heat and cold for a more natural experience, enable designs that minimize the covering of the gingival margins, allow for a stable denture base, and resistance to corrosion.Drawbacks of metal frameworks can include hypersensitivity, aesthetics because of metal metal display, oral galvanism, adverse tissue reactions, osteolysis of abutment teeth, and biofilm production
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Biting force
Time Frame: Change in baseline biting force from time of insertion, insertion after 1 month and after 3 months
|
Biting force of the patient wearing the removable partial denture measured by I-load sensor device.
|
Change in baseline biting force from time of insertion, insertion after 1 month and after 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Al-Jammali ZM. Clinical Evaluation of Maximum Bite Force in Patient with Heat Cure acrylic and Flexible Partial Dentures. Medical Journal of Babylon. 2017;14(3):509-17.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CEBD-CU-2018-11-29
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.