Mini Fluid chAlleNge and End-expiratory Occlusion Test and to Assess flUid responsiVEness in opeRating Room (MANEUVER)
Mini Fluid chAlleNge and End-expiratory Occlusion Test and to Assess flUid responsiVEness in opeRating Room: an Open-label, Randomized Clinical Trial
End-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) has been previously successfully tested in surgical patients, consisting of the interruption of the mechanical ventilation for 30 seconds, and in the evaluation of the changes in the SV.
The mini fluid challenge test (mFC) aims at testing the increase in SV after the rapid administration of a small aliquot of the predefined FC.
Both these test have been previously evaluated in small-sized studies and never compared each other.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Targeted fluid therapy has received increasing attention in the management of patients showing acute circulatory failure in both intensive care unit (ICU) and operating room (OR), aiming at preventing both inadequate tissue blood flow and fluid overload [1]. In fact, unnecessary fluid administration can increase morbidity and mortality and length of hospital stay of critically ill and surgical patients [2-10].
Since the only physiological reason to give a fluid challenge (FC) is to increase the stroke volume (SV) [11-13] and this effect is obtained only in about 50% of ICU and OR patients [14, 15], a vast literature investigated the possibility of predict this effect before FC administration, but the issue remains extremely challenging [1, 13, 16-18]. Bedside clinical signs and pressure and static volumetric static variables, do not predict fluid responsiveness [17]. Moreover, several physiological factors affect the reliability of the ventilator-induced dynamic changes in pulse pressure and stroke volume [pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume (SV) variation (SVV), respectively], and their echographic surrogates, in a significant number of ICU and OR patients [19-22].
To overcome these limitations, the functional hemodynamic assessment (i.e. the assessment of the dynamic interactions of hemodynamic variables in response to a defined perturbation), of fluid responsiveness has gained in popularity [17, 18, 23]. A functional hemodynamic test (FHT) consist in a manoeuvre determining a sudden change in cardiac function and/or heart lung interaction, affecting the hemodynamics of fluid responders and non-responders to a different extent [17, 18, 23].
The FHT called passive leg raising (PLR) has been successfully used for assessing the fluid responsiveness in ICU patients since 2009 [24] and its reliability has been confirmed by three large meta-analyses [25-27]. However, the PLR is not usually practicable in the OR.
A lot of different FHTs have been proposed, as alternative to the PLR, in ICU and, more recently, OR. These tests could be basically subdivided in two groups. A subgroup of FHTs is based on sudden and brief variations of the mechanical ventilation to induce a change in right ventricle preload and/or after load and, as consequence, of left ventricle SV [24, 28]. Among these tests, the end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) has been previously successfully tested in surgical patients, consisting of the interruption of the mechanical ventilation for 30 seconds, and in the evaluation of the changes in the SV. A second subgroup aims at testing the increase in SV after the rapid administration of a small aliquot of the predefined FC [29, 30]. This test is called mini fluid challenge (mFC). Both these test have been previously evaluated in small-sized studies and never compared each other.
The primary aim of the present study is to compare the reliability of EEOT and mFC in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing general surgery.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Novara, Italy, 28100
- Maggiore della Carità University Hospital
-
-
Milano
-
Rozzano, Milano, Italy, 20089
- Humanitas Research Hospital
-
-
Toscana
-
Firenze, Toscana, Italy, 50134
- Careggi University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
All elective adults (age > 18 years) consecutive patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery requiring invasive arterial monitoring and scheduled in those operating rooms equipped with ventilators having an expiratory-hold function.
The preoperative exclusion criteria were 1) any recurrent cardiac arrhythmia; 2) known reduced left (ejection fraction < 30%) or right (systolic peak velocity of tricuspid annular motion < 0.17 m/s) ventricular systolic function; Body Mass Index > 35; 4) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease classified as GOLD ≥ 2. Once enrolled, the patient can be additionally excluded because of the occurrence of one of the following intraoperative conditions: 1) significant bleeding (more than 500 ml in ½ hour); 2) persistent and/or recurrent extrasystoles; 3) persistent low quality of the arterial signal despite optimization of the signal (see further).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Treatment - hemodynamic tests: EEOT and mFC
Interventions: all the enrolled patients will be tested using the EEOT and the mFC.
|
The EEOT is performed by interrupting the mechanical ventilation for 30 seconds, by using and end-expiratory hold on the ventilator.
The mFC is performed by injecting a first aliquot of 100 ml of crystalloid over 1 minute before completing the 4 ml/kg-FC over the residual 9 minutes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
ROC curve calculation
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
Calculation of the area under the ROC curve considering the response to the fluid challenge test (considered as gold standard).
|
10 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
ROC:Comparison of the areas under the ROC curve of each test (EEOT and mFC)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
Comparison of the areas under the ROC curve of each test (EEOT and mFC)
|
10 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Messina A, Pelaia C, Bruni A, Garofalo E, Bonicolini E, Longhini F, Dellara E, Saderi L, Romagnoli S, Sotgiu G, Cecconi M, Navalesi P. Fluid Challenge During Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2018 Dec;127(6):1353-1364. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003834.
- Pinsky MR. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care Clin. 2015 Jan;31(1):89-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2014.08.005.
- Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet PJ, Riu-Poulenc B, Louart G, Candela D, Zoric L, Suehs C, de La Coussaye JE, Molinari N, Lefrant JY; AzuRea Group. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study. Anesthesiology. 2011 Sep;115(3):541-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318229a500.
- Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, Jaeschke R, Mebazaa A, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL, Vincent JL, Rhodes A. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Dec;40(12):1795-815. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
- Biais M, Larghi M, Henriot J, de Courson H, Sesay M, Nouette-Gaulain K. End-Expiratory Occlusion Test Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Protective Ventilation in the Operating Room. Anesth Analg. 2017 Dec;125(6):1889-1895. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002322.
- Messina A, Lionetti G, Foti L, Bellotti E, Marcomini N, Cammarota G, Bennett V, Saderi L, Sotgiu G, Della Corte F, Protti A, Monge Garcia MI, Romagnoli S, Cecconi M. Mini fluid chAllenge aNd End-expiratory occlusion test to assess flUid responsiVEness in the opeRating room (MANEUVER study): A multicentre cohort study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Apr 1;38(4):422-431. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001406.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- MANEUVER_1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Surgery
-
NCT06637995CompletedThoracic Surgery | Spine Surgery | Upper Extremity Surgery | Lower Extremity Surgery | Intracranial Surgery | Extracranial Surgery | Intratemporal Surgery | Extratemporal Surgery | Neck Surgery
-
NCT05614869WithheldAbdominal Surgery | Orthopedic Surgery | Vascular Surgery | Cardiovascular Surgery
-
NCT00699244CompletedHand Surgery | Wrist Surgery | Forearm Surgery | Elbow Surgery
-
NCT01546272CompletedGynecological Surgery | Plastic Surgery | ENT Surgery
-
NCT03981835CompletedSurgery | Cardiac Surgery | Surgery--Complications | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
-
NCT06159517TerminatedCardiac Surgery | Cardiopulmonary Bypass | Thoracic Surgery | Vascular Surgery
-
NCT02964026CompletedCardiac Surgery | Thoracic Surgery | Heart Surgery | Heart Transplant
-
NCT03469570CompletedAbdominal Surgery | Pelvic Surgery | Non-Cardiac/ Non-Thoracic Surgery | Major Peripheral Vascular Surgery
-
NCT07342010Not yet recruitingAnesthesia, Local | Foot Surgery | Hand Surgery | Walant Surgery
-
NCT07354841RecruitingCardiac Surgery | Cardiopulmonary Bypass | Heart Surgery | Aortic Valve Surgery | Cannulation | Coronary Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass | Coronary Surgery | Arterial Cannulation | Venous Cannulation
Clinical Trials on End-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT)
-
NCT03820440UnknownSurgery | Fluid Overload | Hemodynamic Instability
-
NCT05874531CompletedUltrasonography | Intensive Care Units | Blood Volume
-
NCT04932590Completed
-
NCT05957003CompletedPostoperative Complications | Cardiac Surgery | Fluid Overload
-
NCT04399278CompletedSurgery | General Anesthesia | Hemodynamic Instability | Protective Mechanical Ventilation
-
NCT05898269RecruitingAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
-
NCT04457739CompletedSeptic Shock | Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | Hemodynamic Instability
-
NCT06040138RecruitingRespiratory Failure | Weaning Failure