The Incidence of Artifacts in the Anesthesia Information Management System Database.
To Evaluate the Incidence of Artifacts in the Locally Developed AIMS Database.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
At first, the authors evaluated the accuracy of the traditional, manually completed paper-based documentation, which sets a benchmark for the accuracy that the electronic documentation and database provides.
At the second portion, the investigators used the paper-based documentation as a standard to compare the electronic documentation. The incidence of artifact was double checked by two investigators.
At the third portion, the authors calculated the artifact incidence in the AIMS database, using paper based and electric document anesthesia records as the standard respectively.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 104
- Mackay Memorial Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patient undergo general or regional anesthesia
- elective surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- emergency operation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
paper-based anesthesia record
The AIMS sampled the vital signs from the monitor every minute and stored in the database. The incidence of artifacts in the AIMS database was evaluated by paper-based documented anesthesia record. |
to evaluate the incidence of artifacts in the AIMS database by paper-based anesthesia record
|
|
electronic documents
The AIMS sampled the vital signs from the monitor every minute and stored in the database. The incidence of artifacts in the AIMS database was evaluated by electric documented anesthesia record. |
to evaluate the incidence of artifacts in the AIMS database by electronic documents anesthesia record
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
percentage of artifacts
Time Frame: intraoperative (from the beginning to the end of anesthesia record)
|
to evaluate how many percentage of artifacts for each of the included parameters
|
intraoperative (from the beginning to the end of anesthesia record)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
deviating values
Time Frame: intraoperative (from the beginning to the end of anesthesia record)
|
to calculate the number of values deviating from the predefined baseline value
|
intraoperative (from the beginning to the end of anesthesia record)
|
|
percentage of devotional artifacts
Time Frame: intraoperative (from the beginning to the end of anesthesia record)
|
to evaluate how many percentage of the deviations are artifacts
|
intraoperative (from the beginning to the end of anesthesia record)
|
|
episodes of artifacts
Time Frame: intraoperative (from the beginning to the end of anesthesia record)
|
to find out the average of number of episodes across each artifact
|
intraoperative (from the beginning to the end of anesthesia record)
|
|
causes of artifacts
Time Frame: intraoperative (from the beginning to the end of anesthesia record)
|
to find out the cause of the artifact and respective percentage
|
intraoperative (from the beginning to the end of anesthesia record)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Wilbanks BA, Berner ES, Alexander GL, Azuero A, Patrician PA, Moss JA. The effect of data-entry template design and anesthesia provider workload on documentation accuracy, documentation efficiency, and user-satisfaction. Int J Med Inform. 2018 Oct;118:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
- Kool NP, van Waes JA, Bijker JB, Peelen LM, van Wolfswinkel L, de Graaff JC, van Klei WA. Artifacts in research data obtained from an anesthesia information and management system. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Sep;59(9):833-41. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9754-0. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
- Hoorweg AJ, Pasma W, van Wolfswinkel L, de Graaff JC. Incidence of Artifacts and Deviating Values in Research Data Obtained from an Anesthesia Information Management System in Children. Anesthesiology. 2018 Feb;128(2):293-304. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001895.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 19MMHIS017e
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.