Risk EValuation And Its Impact on ClinicAL Decision Making and Outcomes in Heart Failure (REVeAL-HF)

April 20, 2022 updated by: Yale University

The REVeAL-HF Trial: Risk EValuation And Its Impact on ClinicAL Decision Making and Outcomes in Heart Failure

Heart failure is a complex and heterogenous disease with mortality and morbidity that equals more cancers. Numerous studies have examined the ability to improve prognostication from heart failure, ranging from basic statistical methodologies to machine learning, with impressive improvements in both predictive indices. However, no study to date has examined, in a randomized fashion, the impact of providing prognostic information on provider behavior and downstream clinical outcomes. It is for this reason that the investigators plan to perform the Risk EValuation And Its Impact on ClinicAL Decision Making and Outcomes in Heart Failure (REVeAL-HF) Trial within the Yale New Haven Health System. REVeAL-HF is a randomized, single-blind intervention trial that is testing the clinical impact of providing prognostic information to the provider on heart failure outcomes in the inpatient settings. The study hypothesis is that electronic alerting about prognostic information on heart failure patients along with links to guidelines will lead to reductions in all-cause mortality and 30-day HF hospitalizations via improved use of guideline directed medical therapy and more adequate decongestion.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Heart failure is the major cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States and Western Europe and prognosis in individual patients is highly variable. Quantifying a patient's survival prospects based on their overall risk profile has the potential to help identify those patients in need of more intensive monitoring and help target appropriate populations for therapies. In fact, several comprehensive risk scores in patients with heart failure are currently available for both reduced and preserved ejection fraction but their applicability to contemporary heart failure populations is unknown. Additionally, the impact of knowing a patient's prognostic information on treatment decisions in heart failure has never been studied. Therefore, guidelines do not recommend using risk assessments to decide on therapeutic decision making in heart failure due to a lack of data for this strategy. The investigators have proposed a randomized controlled trial be conducted of an electronic alert system that informs practitioners about their patients risk of inpatient mortality and 1-year predicted mortality using data from the electronic health record (EHR). The primary outcome for the trial will be a composite of all-cause mortality and 30-day risk of heart failure rehospitalization. The secondary outcomes will be length of stay, discharge doses of heart failure therapies, palliative care referral, referral for advanced therapies like transplant or mechanical circulatory support, referral to electrophysiology, and change in weight during hospitalization (aggressiveness of diuresis). The investigators will enroll into the trial across the hospitals that comprise the Yale New Haven Health System.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
3124

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Yale New Haven Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18
  • NTproBNP levels of >500pg/mL within 24 hours of admission
  • Intravenous diuretics within 24 hours of admission

Exclusion Criteria:

• None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SEQUENTIAL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
NO_INTERVENTION: Usual Care
Providers taking care of patients randomized to this arm will have no alert related to the patients prognosis.
EXPERIMENTAL: Electronic Alert
Patients randomized to the intervention will have an alert of their prognosis based on the best available prognostic models for inpatient and 1-year mortality generated with information from their electronic health record, which will consist of a "pop-up" when the provider accesses a patient record to enter a progress note after the definitions for inclusions into the study have been registered.
Behavioral: Electronic Alert
Patients randomized to the intervention will have an alert of their prognosis based on the best available prognostic models for inpatient and 1-year mortality generated with information from their electronic health record, which will consist of a "pop-up" when the provider accesses a patient record to enter a progress note after the definitions for inclusions into the study have been registered.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-Cause Mortality
Time Frame: 1 Year
All cause mortality will be monitored and reported.
1 Year
Heart failure Re-hospitalization
Time Frame: 30 Days Post Discharge
30-day risk of heart failure re-hospitalization will be assessed and reported.
30 Days Post Discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of stay
Time Frame: 1 Year
Average length of stay will be collected in Days
1 Year
Discharge doses of heart failure therapies
Time Frame: 1 Year
Discharge doses of guideline recommended heart failure therapies in milligrams (mg)
1 Year
Palliative care referral
Time Frame: 1 Year
Palliative care referrals will be collected and counted (Number)
1 Year
Advanced therapies referral
Time Frame: 1 Year
Referrals for advanced therapies like transplant or mechanical circulatory support will be collected and counted (number)
1 Year
Electrophysiology referral
Time Frame: 1 Year
Referrals to electrophysiology will be collected and counted (number)
1 Year
Weight Change
Time Frame: 1 Year
Weight change is defined as the change in weight during hospitalization (kg)
1 Year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Yale University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nihar R Desai, MD MPH, Yale University
  • Principal Investigator: Francis P Wilson, MD MS, Yale University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 18, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 20, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2000025000

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data will be housed at Yale University.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings