Mechanisms and Outcome-Prognostication for Paresthesia-based and -Free Spinal Cord Stimulation (MOPPStim)

January 14, 2026 updated by: Anuj Bhatia, University Health Network, Toronto

Mechanisms and Outcome-Prognostication for Paresthesia-based and -Free Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Persistent Neuropathic Pain: the MOPPStim Study

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) relies on stimulation of pain-relieving pathways in the spinal cord to treat chronic neuropathic pain. Traditional paresthesia-based SCS (PB-SCS) relies on providing analgesia through stimulation of spinal cord dorsal columns but it is often associated with attenuation of analgesic benefit and lack of acceptance of paresthesias. Recently introduced three different paresthesia-free (PF-SCS) modes of stimulation aim to overcome limitations of PB-SCS. Several questions regarding PB and PF SCS modes remain unanswered including the mechanisms of therapeutic benefit, criteria for selecting patients likely to benefit, and long-term outcomes. A concerted effort is required to understand and optimize utilization of SCS. This project has the twin goals of using neuroimaging techniques to understand mechanisms that underlies analgesic benefit from PB/PF-SCS modes and to identify criteria for selecting patients based on monitoring of pain and its related domains in patients undergoing SCS trials. Achieving these objectives will increase probability of analgesic benefit while minimizing adverse effects and knowledge gains from this study will be applicable to other therapies for chronic pain conditions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Over 7 million Canadians suffer from chronic pain with 1 in 4 patients having neuropathic pain (NP), a condition caused by injury to nerves in the body. NP tends to have an extremely unpleasant character, severe intensity, and a persistent unremitting course. Conventional medical management (CMM) is often ineffective in relieving NP in majority of these patients. Paresthesia-Based Spinal Cord Stimulation (PB-SCS) has been used to treat NP but it has limitations in terms of preserving analgesic benefit and it is often associated with adverse effects. Recently introduced Paresthesia-Free SCS (PF-SCS), available at all tertiary level pain centers, has the potential to overcome these limitations but knowledge gaps remain in understanding and applying this modality.

The study design will be a prospective, exploratory study with randomization of order of no stimulation with novel modes of PF-SCS during the SCS trial and blinding of subjects (as per clinical standard of care) and outcome assessors. Participants with appropriate indications for trial of SCS with novel paresthesia-free modes will be enrolled. Baseline demographic and pain-related data including opioid intake in Oral Morphine Equivalents Per day in mg (OMED) will be collected. Pre-SCS trial neuroimaging (fMRI, MEG) and QST will be performed to establish parameters for future comparisons. Data on physical activity and sleep will be collected using actigraphy, as per standard of care. Data on pain and its related domains will be collected using validated questionnaires on the Manage My Pain app, in which all questionnaires administered are part of the patient's clinical standard of care. Ninety subjects will undergo a percutaneous trial of SCS that will last 12 days and the trial will be divided into three phases. All subjects will trial a conventional paresthesia-based SCS mode in the first four days of the trial. Subjects will then proceed the next four days (day 5-8) with no (placebo) stimulation, followed by one of the three novel PF-SCS modes (Burst, High Frequency, High Density) for the last 4 days of the trial. This process is currently adopted for all patients receiving SCS as standard of care. Neuroimaging (fMRI, MEG) and QST will be performed at the end of the SCS trial. Subjects who achieve significant reduction in pain, disability and sleep disturbance questionnaire scores with one of the novel PF-SCS modes will be offered percutaneous implantation of SCS system 4 to 6 weeks after the end of the trial using the novel PF-SCS mode they experienced during the trial. MEG and QST will be performed and data from validated questionnaires on the Manage My Pain app will be collected at 6 months after implantation.

Use of fMRI (functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging), MEG (Magnetoencephalography), and QST (Quantitative Sensory Testing) in this study will help improve understanding of the alteration in brain in NP and the analgesic action of PB/PF-SCS. Validation of wearable technology and of app-based digital platforms will allow these available but infrequently-used modalities to improve success of analgesic treatments in patients with chronic pain. Healthcare systems will benefit through efficient use of resources to treat chronic pain made possible by understanding what works, who does it work for, and how to predict analgesic benefit.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8
        • Recruiting
        • Toronto Western Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults, 18 - 80 years of age, with refractory neuropathic pain (as per clinical features and DN4 score > 3/10) in back and or lower limbs for more than 3 months following lumbar spine surgery
  2. Severity of pain > 3/10 on NRS and ODI score for disability >40/100; and
  3. Pain refractory to conventional medical management tried for at least 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age < 18 or age ≥ 80 years;
  2. Previous trial or implantation of SCS system;
  3. Procedural contraindications to SCS including extensive thoracolumbar spine surgery, moderate-to-severe central canal stenosis, coagulopathy, local or systemic infection;
  4. Pregnancy;
  5. Opioid dose > 200 mg OMED;
  6. Psychiatric or psychological disorder likely to impact perception of pain;
  7. Inability to comply with the study interventions or evaluate treatment outcomes;
  8. Mechanical spine instability as per flexion/extension lumbar X-rays;
  9. Ongoing litigation issues related to the pain; and
  10. Concomitant peripheral neuropathy or myopathy or central neuropathic pain (e.g. post-stroke pain).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Spinal Cord Stimulation

At baseline, the following data will be recorded: standard-of-care questionnaire scores, neuroimaging (fMRI, MEG), psychophysical testing (QST), accelerometer sleep and activity data.

The trial will proceed as follows:

Day 1-4: Paresthesia-based SCS (PB-SCS)

Day 5-8: No SCS (placebo)

Day 9-12: PF-SCS

Neuroimaging and psychophysical testing will be conducted at the end of the trial, and will be assessed 6-months post-implantation of the SCS device along with adverse effects. A decision to implant the SCS system will be made based on reduction of patient pain intensity by 50% in PB-SCS and/or PF-SCS modes, but not with placebo SCS.

Based on the response in the trial, the patient will either not be a candidate for an SCS implant, or they will receive one of the four modes upon implantation (PB-SCS, or one of the three PF-SCS: Burst, High Frequency, High Density).
Device: Spinal Cord Stimulation
Paresthesia-based SCS(PB-SCS), with stimulating frequencies between 30 to 80 Hz that confer a tingling sensation. Three different paresthesia-free SCS (PF-SCS) modes that use frequencies in the range of 400-10,000 Hz include Burst, High Frequency stimulation at 1.2 kHz and High Density stimulation at 400 Hz.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in neuronal activity with the novel PF-SCS modes as detected by fMRI and MEG
Time Frame: 12 days after the initiation of the SCS trials )
12 days after the initiation of the SCS trials )
Changes in neuronal activity with the novel PF-SCS modes as detected by fMRI and MEG
Time Frame: 6 months after the initiation of the SCS implants
6 months after the initiation of the SCS implants
To measure long-term outcomes of novel PF-SCS modes including intensity and quality of pain, physical and psychological functioning, and patients' global impression of change
Time Frame: 6 months after the initiation of the SCS implants.
6 months after the initiation of the SCS implants.
Changes in sensory threshold with the novel PF-SCS modes as detected by QST
Time Frame: 6 months after the initiation of the SCS implants
6 months after the initiation of the SCS implants

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To measure incidence of more than 50% reduction in pain intensity scores in patients with NP syndromes with novel modes of SCS
Time Frame: Six months after implantation.
Six months after implantation.
To correlate data on physical activity as measured by an accelerometer during trials of novel SCS modes with data obtained from validated questionnaires
Time Frame: 12 days after the initiation of the SCS trial
12 days after the initiation of the SCS trial
To correlate data on sleep as measured by an accelerometer during trials of novel SCS modes with data obtained from validated questionnaires
Time Frame: 12 days after the initiation of the SCS trial
12 days after the initiation of the SCS trial
To measure incidences of analgesic failure (as indicated with less than 50% reduction in pain intensity scores) and adverse effects of PF-SCS
Time Frame: Six months after implantation.
Six months after implantation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Health Network, Toronto

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
MSH-UHN AMO Innovation Fund

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Anuj Bhatia, MD FRCPC, University Health Network, Toronto

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 31, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 14, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 18-5864

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings