Can Probiotic Vivomixx Eradicate Colonization With ESBL?

May 23, 2019 updated by: Lund University

Probiotics as Intestinal Decolonization of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae; a Randomized, Single Blinded, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial

Can probiotic Vivomixx eradicate Extended Spectrum BetaLactam (ESBL) colonization in adult patients?

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Infections due to extended spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (ESCRE) are a widely recognized public health threat. The prevalence of ESCRE is comparably low in Sweden but is steadily increasing; approximately 5 % of Swedish inhabitants are carrying ESCRE in the gut. ESCRE can lead to infections mainly from urine, abdomen and blood. These infections can be problematic to treat with current available antibiotics and represent a clinical challenge for clinicians around the world with considerable mortality and morbidity. Risk factors for acquiring an ESCRE is e.g. antibiotic treatment, trips to high prevalence countries, family member with ESCRE etc.

The duration of ESCRE carriage is not known. One Swedish study showed that ESCRE carriage can continue despite antibiotic treatment and that false negative cultures in between positive cultures are common. Since few new groups of antibiotics have been developed in the last decades, infections due to ESCRE may be increasingly difficult to treat. The possibility of ESCRE decolonization is therefore a desirable aim, in particular the more virulent enterobacteriaceae strains leading to recurrent clinical infection episodes.

Probiotics are microorganisms marketed as useful bacteria effective locally in the gut. In recent years many studies have focused on potential health benefits in a range of different gastrointestinal diseases e.g. ulcerous colitis, Crohn's disease, antibiotic associated diarrhoea where probiotics potentially have a therapeutic role4. Smaller studies have shown that probiotics possibly can bind and eliminate enteric pathogenic bacteria5-6. A small in vitro study showed that probiotics can be effective against antibiotic resistant bacteria. Larger clinical treatment studies are needed.

ESCRE constitutes a clinical problem and is largely seen in Escherichia coli and klebsiella spp. The investigator's theory is that the probiotic Vivomixx can reject ESCRE and thus decolonize the gut. Vivomixx contains eight different strains of probiotics; Bifidobacterium breve, B. longum, B. infantis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. plantarum, L. paracasei, L. bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus and has the best documentation in clinical studies for enteric diseases of today.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Sweden
    • Skåne
      • Helsingborg, Skåne, Sweden, 25187
        • Oskar Ljungquist

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic (more than three months) ESBL colonization of the same strain as determined by
  • species, phenotype and antibiogram.
  • Patients must be able to swallow sachets.
  • Must be able to speak and understand Swedish.
  • Must have a permanent residence in Sweden.
  • Must be able to sign informed consent in Swedish.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Immunosuppression (i.e. chemotheraphy, treatment with TNF-alpha-inhibitors).
  • In patient care.
  • immunodeficiency
  • psychiatric disorder
  • alcohol or substance abuse
  • dementia
  • Invasive catheters.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Dietary supplement: Placebo
Two months of 2 sachets placebo each morning and 2 sachets each night. Each sachet of placebo contains 450 billion live bacteria.
Experimental: Probiotic
Vivomixx
Dietary supplement: Vivomixx
Two months of 2 sachets vivomixx each morning and 2 sachets each night. Each sachet of viviomixx contains 450 billion live bacteria.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of participants that have changed from ESBL-postitive to ESBL-negative.
Time Frame: After 12 months, the number of participants that have changed from ESBL-postitive to ESBL-negative will be assessed.
Each patient included provides three faecal samples after the intervention which will be selectively cultured for ESBL. Rate of patients that have three negative ESBL cultures will be compared between the two groups.
After 12 months, the number of participants that have changed from ESBL-postitive to ESBL-negative will be assessed.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Lund University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 23, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2017-678678

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings