Memantine Effects on Sensorimotor Gating and Neurocognition in Schizophrenia

December 1, 2022 updated by: Neal R. Swerdlow, M.D., Ph.D., University of California, San Diego
This application seeks to determine if neurophysiological metrics of memantine (MEM)-enhanced early auditory information processing (EAIP) in schizophrenia (SZ) mediate gains in auditory processing fidelity (APF) and auditory learning.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
42

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
        • Clinical Teaching Facility (CTF-B102) at UCSD Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 46 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of schizophrenia OR schizoaffective-depressed OR healthy subjects
  • ages 18-50 for all subjects
  • double barrier contraception for all subjects
  • not pregnant for all subjects

Exclusion Criteria:

  • DSM-IV Axis I or II Diagnosis for for healthy subjects
  • MEM or amantadine for patients
  • current substance abuse for all subjects
  • current recreational drug use for all subjects
  • history of other significant medical illness (e.g. cancer, diabetes, heart disease, HIV, seizures) for all subjects
  • open head injury or closed head injury with loss of consciousness > 1 min for all subjects
  • hearing or visual impairment for all subjects
  • pregnancy for all subjects
  • dementia for all subjects
  • mental retardation for all subjects

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Drug: Placebos
To assess the acute effects of MEM (0 vs. 20 mg) on measures of auditory processing fidelity, auditory learning and EAIP, in AP-medicated adult SZ patients and HS.
Active Comparator: Memantine
Drug: Memantine
To assess the acute effects of MEM (0 vs. 20 mg) on measures of auditory processing fidelity, auditory learning and EAIP, in AP-medicated adult SZ patients and HS.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prepulse Inhibition (PPI)
Time Frame: 7 and 14 days post baseline
PPI of the startle reflex is the automatic reduction in startle magnitude (assessed by EMG of orbicularis oculi) when a startling stimulus (40 ms 118 dB(A) noise burst; "PULSE") is preceded (10-120 msec) by a weak stimulus (here a 20 msec burst 16 dB over background "PREPULSE"). A %PPI metric is calculated based on the relative startle magnitude on (PREPULSE + PULSE) trials vs. PULSE alone trials. Possible maximal inhibition is 100%; there is no maximal "negative" value of inhibition. There is no clear "advantage" or "disadvantage" for lower or higher %PPI values, though on average, schizophrenia patients demonstrate lower % values compared to matched healthy subjects. Day 1 was baseline testing: testing occurred, data was collected, but no "intervention" was given. There were two possible "interventions": active (MEM 20 mg po) and placebo. One intervention was given on day 7 post baseline, the other intervention was given on day 14 post baseline, with order of intervention balanced.
7 and 14 days post baseline
Mismatch Negativity (MMN); Unit of Measure of MMN is Microvolts.
Time Frame: 7 and 14 days post baseline
85 dB SPL stimuli were presented via Etymotic ER3-A insert earphones. A 4-tone auditory oddball paradigm with 82% standards & 18% deviant stimuli, differed from standard in pitch, duration, or both. A pseudorandomized sequence produced a minimum of 3 standard tones between each deviant stimulus. All tones had 5-ms rise/fall times presented with a fixed 500-ms stimulus onset asynchrony. Subjects viewed a silent movie & instructed to ignore auditory stimuli. EEG were continuously recorded at a sampling rate of 2048-Hz from 64 channels, using BioSemi ActiveTwo system & downsampled to 512-Hz. Deviant-minus-standard difference waves were generated for each deviant type & low-pass filtered (20-Hz zerophase shift, 24 dB/octave rolloff). MMN was computed as mean amplitude across 135-205 ms range for each deviant type in difference waveforms at electrode Fz. Data were analyzed by RM-ANOVA, with diagnosis as a between-subject factor, & drug condition (placebo vs MEM) as a within-subject factor.
7 and 14 days post baseline
Gamma Auditory Steady-state Response (ASSR). The Primary Unit of Measure of Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) is Gamma Evoked Power (γEP), Expressed as "Microvolts-squared".
Time Frame: 7 and 14 days post baseline
1 ms, 85 dB clicks were presented in 500 ms trains at a frequency of 40 Hz; 250 click trains were played (inter-train interval=0.5 s). EEG was continuously recorded with 64-channel BioSemi ActiveTwo system (sampling rate=2048 Hz). Data processed offline via Matlab, EEGlab, & BrainVision Analyzer. Continuous data were segmented relative to stimulus onset (-100 ms to 500 ms) & each epoch was baseline-corrected relative to 100 ms pre-stimulus interval. γEP was assessed based on first 100 artifact-free epochs at Fz. Averaged epochs across click trains were transformed into power spectrum via fast Fourier transform using a bin width of 2 Hz. 40 Hz power spectrum was averaged across 4 Hz band from 38-42 Hz. Data were analyzed by RM-ANOVA, with diagnosis as a between- & drug condition (placebo vs MEM) as a within-subject factor. Analyses revealed robust & time bin-independent effects of diagnosis & drug across 200-500 ms window & thus this interval was the focus of all subsequent analyses.
7 and 14 days post baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, San Diego

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 1, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R01MH094320 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings