Biomimetic Stent and Drug Eluting Balloon to Treat Recurrent Cephalic Arch Stenosis (Arch-V)
Biomimetic (SUPERA) Stent and Drug Eluting Balloon (Passeo 18 Lux) to Treat Recurrent Cephalic Arch Stenosis
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Singapore, Singapore, 169608
- Singapore General Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient's age is above 21 and below 90
- Informed consent obtained
- Chronic background treatment with daily ASA
- Patients with significant Cephalic Arch Vein Stenosis or recurrent stenosis within 6 months of initial POBA diagnosed either clinically or with Duplex Ultrasound
- Post-angioplasty cephalic arch lumen size between 5mm - 7mm maximum diameter
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with significant central vein stenosis (>70%) or total occlusion at time of angiographic study
- Cephalic arch stenosis <50% stenosis or diameter >5mm
- Patients with previous cephalic arch stenting (Bare Metal Stents or stent graft)
- Concomitant fistula inflow problem (e.g. juxta-anastomotic) that cannot be corrected optimally during the intervention (>30% residual stenosis or angiographic lumen <3mm)
- Patients with minor or major cephalic arch rupture during POBA procedure and the rupture point cannot be adequately sealed off during the procedure requiring a covered stent or open conversion
- Cephalic arch lesion length <10mm or greater than 10cm
- Patients with uncontrolled hypertension
- Patient <21 or > 90 years of age.
- Pregnant women or women of childbearing potential who are not following an effective method of contraception.
- Contraindication to aspirin or clopidogrel usage
- Mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences o the study, or language barrier such that the subject is unable to give informed consent.
- Uncooperative attitude or potential for non-compliance with the requirements of the protocol making study participation impractical
- Patients who do NOT have impaired renal function
- Occluded or thrombosed fistula
- Patients presenting with central venous stenosis
- Final angioplasty treatment requires a stent or DEB >7mm in diameter
- Multiple lesions in the access circuit that cannot be treated with one stent and DEB.
- Vascular access circuit placed in the lower extremities
- Bare metal stent or stent-graft placed previously
- Metastatic caner or terminal medical condition
- Blood coagulation disorder
- Limited life expectancy (<6 months)
- Sepsis or active infection
- Recent arm thrombophlebitis
- Allergy or other known contraindication to iodinated media contrast, heparin or paclitaxel
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Passeo-18 Lux and SUPERA® stent
Target lesion will be treated with Passeo-18 Lux Drug Eluting Balloon and SUPERA® stent during angioplasty
|
Angioplasty of Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) performed using Passeo-18 Lux and SUPERA® stent for patients with cephalic arch stenosis
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Angiographic Success
Time Frame: Immediately post-operation
|
<30% regional stenosis within the stent and minimal lumen size should reach 5mm
|
Immediately post-operation
|
|
Functional Fistula
Time Frame: Post-operation 1 week, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months.
|
At the following time points, to monitor for any changes in whether fistula can be used successfully for dialysis without the need for re-intervention.
|
Post-operation 1 week, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months.
|
|
Primary Patency of Cephalic Arch
Time Frame: 1 year post-operation
|
Less than 50% stenosis observed on duplex ultrasound
|
1 year post-operation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Access Circuit Thrombosis
Time Frame: 1 year post-operation
|
Thrombosis of access circuit requiring further intervention such as thrombolysis
|
1 year post-operation
|
|
Number of re-interventions per year
Time Frame: 1 year post-operation
|
To note any re-interventions performed post-study procedure
|
1 year post-operation
|
|
Access Circuit Restenosis / Stent Fractures
Time Frame: 1 year post-operation
|
To note any restenosis or stent fractures during study period that requires re-intervention
|
1 year post-operation
|
|
Access Circuit Infection
Time Frame: 1 year post-operation
|
To note any infection at treated fistula during study period
|
1 year post-operation
|
|
Need for bypass revision surgery
Time Frame: 1 year post-operation
|
1 year post-operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tang Tjun Yip, Singapore General Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Scheinert D, Werner M, Scheinert S, Paetzold A, Banning-Eichenseer U, Piorkowski M, Ulrich M, Bausback Y, Braunlich S, Schmidt A. Treatment of complex atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease with a new self-expanding interwoven nitinol stent: 12-month results of the Leipzig SUPERA popliteal artery stent registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jan;6(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.09.011.
- Garcia L, Jaff MR, Metzger C, Sedillo G, Pershad A, Zidar F, Patlola R, Wilkins RG, Espinoza A, Iskander A, Khammar GS, Khatib Y, Beasley R, Makam S, Kovach R, Kamat S, Leon LR Jr, Eaves WB, Popma JJ, Mauri L, Donohoe D, Base CC, Rosenfield K; SUPERB Trial Investigators. Wire-Interwoven Nitinol Stent Outcome in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries: Twelve-Month Results of the SUPERB Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;8(5):e000937. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000937. Erratum In: Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;8(6). pii: e000014. doi: 10.1161/HCV.0000000000000014.
- Bishu K, Armstrong EJ. Supera self-expanding stents for endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease: a review of the clinical evidence. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015 Jul 13;11:387-95. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S70229. eCollection 2015.
- Micari A, Brodmann M, Keirse K, Peeters P, Tepe G, Frost M, Wang H, Zeller T; IN.PACT Global Study Investigators. Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions for Patients With Intermittent Claudication and Ischemic Rest Pain: 2-Year Results From the IN.PACT Global Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 May 28;11(10):945-953. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.019.
- Zeller T, Beschorner U, Pilger E, Bosiers M, Deloose K, Peeters P, Scheinert D, Schulte KL, Rastan A, Brodmann M. Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon in Infrapopliteal Arteries: 12-Month Results From the BIOLUX P-II Randomized Trial (BIOTRONIK'S-First in Man study of the Passeo-18 LUX drug releasing PTA Balloon Catheter vs. the uncoated Passeo-18 PTA balloon catheter in subjects requiring revascularization of infrapopliteal arteries). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Oct;8(12):1614-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.011.
- Zhang D, Yang R, Wang S, Dong Z. Paclitaxel: new uses for an old drug. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014 Feb 20;8:279-84. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S56801. eCollection 2014.
- Cho SB, Choi HC, Bae E, Park TJ, Baek HJ, Park SE, Ryu KH, Moon JI, Choi BH, Bae K, Jeon KN. Angioplasty and stenting for the proximal anastomotic stenosis of a brachio-axillary bypass graft using a helical interwoven nitinol stent: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(50):e9073. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009073.
- Tang TY, Tan CS, Yap C, Tan RY, Tay HH, Choke E, Chong TT. Helical stent (SUPERA) and drug-coated balloon (Passeo-18 Lux) for recurrent cephalic arch stenosis: Rationale and design of arch V SUPERA-LUX Study. J Vasc Access. 2020 Jul;21(4):504-510. doi: 10.1177/1129729819881589. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2018/2557
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.