3D Comparison of Anterior Teeth Retraction and Anchorage Control Between En-masse and Two-step Mechanics
3D Comparison of Anterior Teeth Retraction and Anchorage Control Between En-masse and Two-step Mechanics: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Sergio Caetano, MSc
- Phone Number: +55(21)97912-5679
- Email: srocaetano@hotmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Flavia Artese, PhD
- Phone Number: +55(21)98155-4280
- Email: flaviaartese@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 20551-030
- Recruiting
- Faculdade de Odontologia - UERJ
-
Contact:
- Sergio Caetano, MSc
- Phone Number: +55(21)97912-5679
- Email: srocaetano@hotmail.com
-
Contact:
- Flavia Artese, PhD
- Phone Number: +55(21)98155-4280
- Email: flaviaartese@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Angle Class I malocclusion;
- Bimaxillary protrusion;
- Convex profile;
- All natural teeth present in the mouth;
- Absence of crowding or with negative discrepancy up to 4mm;
- Absence of vertical and transverse occlusal problems;
- Good oral health;
- Good general health.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Lack of time to attend consultations;
- Patients with severe systemic and psychological illness;
- Patients with parafunction (bruxism), reflux or eating disorders;
- Presence of periodontal disease;
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: En Masse Retraction
Group treated by retracting the six anterior teeth simultaneously.
|
After extraction of the four premolars the posterior teeth will be tied-together and the six anterior teeth will be retracted by sliding mechanics.
|
|
Active Comparator: Two-Step Retraction
Group treated by retracting the canines incisors in two different steps.
|
After extraction of the four premolars the posterior teeth will be tied-together and the canines will be retracted by sliding mechanics.
After the distalization of the canines they will be tied to the posterior teeth and the incisors will be retracted by sliding mechanics.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Anchorage loss
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Quantitative assessment of posterior anchorage loss between the two groups as measured by tomographic superimposition at the end of space closure.
|
12 months
|
|
Anterior teeth retraction
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Quantitative assessment of anterior teeth retraction between the two groups as measured by tomographic superimposition at the end of space closure.
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Molar inclination
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Quantitative assessment of molars inclination between the two groups as measured by tomographic superimposition at the end of space closure.
|
12 months
|
|
Canine inclination
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Quantitative assessment of canines inclination between the two groups as measured by tomographic superimposition at the end of space closure.
|
12 months
|
|
Incisors inclination
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Quantitative assessment of incisors inclination between the two groups as measured by tomographic superimposition at the end of space closure.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: José Augusto M Miguel, PhD, Rio de Janeiro State University
- Principal Investigator: Sergio Caetano, MSc, Rio de Janeiro State University
- Study Director: Flavia Artese, PhD, Rio de Janeiro State University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cevidanes LH, Styner MA, Proffit WR. Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 May;129(5):611-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.008.
- Heo W, Nahm DS, Baek SH. En masse retraction and two-step retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in adult Class I women. A comparison of anchorage loss. Angle Orthod. 2007 Nov;77(6):973-8. doi: 10.2319/111706-464.1.
- Ribeiro GL, Jacob HB. Understanding the basis of space closure in Orthodontics for a more efficient orthodontic treatment. Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Mar-Apr;21(2):115-25. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.115-125.sar.
- Solem RC, Marasco R, Guiterrez-Pulido L, Nielsen I, Kim SH, Nelson G. Three-dimensional soft-tissue and hard-tissue changes in the treatment of bimaxillary protrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):218-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.018.
- Xu TM, Zhang X, Oh HS, Boyd RL, Korn EL, Baumrind S. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Nov;138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.027.
- Schneider PP, Gandini Junior LG, Monini ADC, Pinto ADS, Kim KB. Comparison of anterior retraction and anchorage control between en masse retraction and two-step retraction: A randomized prospective clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2019 Mar;89(2):190-199. doi: 10.2319/051518-363.1. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
- Leonardi R, Annunziata A, Licciardello V, Barbato E. Soft tissue changes following the extraction of premolars in nongrowing patients with bimaxillary protrusion. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):211-6. doi: 10.2319/010709-16.1.
- Kojima Y, Fukui H. Numerical simulation of canine retraction by sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 May;127(5):542-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.007.
- Bennett JC, McLaughlin RP. Controlled space closure with a preadjusted appliance system. J Clin Orthod. 1990 Apr;24(4):251-60. No abstract available.
- Pervin S, Rolland S, Taylor G. En masse versus two-step retraction of the anterior segment. Evid Based Dent. 2018 Dec;19(4):111-112. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401343.
- Rizk MZ, Mohammed H, Ismael O, Bearn DR. Effectiveness of en masse versus two-step retraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod. 2018 Jan 5;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0196-7.
- Cevidanes LH, Bailey LJ, Tucker GR Jr, Styner MA, Mol A, Phillips CL, Proffit WR, Turvey T. Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005 Nov;34(6):369-75. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/17102411.
- Feldmann I, Bondemark L. Orthodontic anchorage: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2006 May;76(3):493-501. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0493:OA]2.0.CO;2.
- Geron S, Shpack N, Kandos S, Davidovitch M, Vardimon AD. Anchorage loss--a multifactorial response. Angle Orthod. 2003 Dec;73(6):730-7. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)0732.0.CO;2.
- Domingo-Clerigues M, Montiel-Company JM, Almerich-Silla JM, Garcia-Sanz V, Paredes-Gallardo V, Bellot-Arcis C. Changes in the alveolar bone thickness of maxillary incisors after orthodontic treatment involving extractions - A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Jan 1;11(1):e76-e84. doi: 10.4317/jced.55434. eCollection 2019 Jan.
- Keim RG. Space closure and anchorage control. J Clin Orthod. 2013 Mar;47(3):153-4. No abstract available.
- Keim RG. The challenge of bimaxillary protrusion. J Clin Orthod. 2017 Jun;51(6):315-316. No abstract available.
- Liu Y, Olszewski R, Alexandroni ES, Enciso R, Xu T, Mah JK. The validity of in vivo tooth volume determinations from cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):160-6. doi: 10.2319/121608-639.1.
- Shearn BN, Woods MG. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of lower first and second premolar extraction effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Mar;117(3):351-61. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70240-x.
- Ong HB, Woods MG. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of maxillary first and second premolar extraction effects. Angle Orthod. 2001 Apr;71(2):90-102. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)0712.0.CO;2.
- Williams R, Hosila FJ. The effect of different extraction sites upon incisor retraction. Am J Orthod. 1976 Apr;69(4):388-410. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(76)90208-6.
- Yoshida N, Koga Y, Mimaki N, Kobayashi K. In vivo determination of the centres of resistance of maxillary anterior teeth subjected to retraction forces. Eur J Orthod. 2001 Oct;23(5):529-34. doi: 10.1093/ejo/23.5.529.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 04186818.2.0000.5259
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.