- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03903575
3D Comparison of Anterior Teeth Retraction and Anchorage Control Between En-masse and Two-step Mechanics
April 3, 2019 updated by: Sergio Roberto de Oliveira Caetano, Rio de Janeiro State University
3D Comparison of Anterior Teeth Retraction and Anchorage Control Between En-masse and Two-step Mechanics: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial
The aim of this study is to compare en masse (EM) and two-step anterior teeth retraction (TSR) evaluated by means of three-dimensional images superimposition.
Thirty-two adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion planed for treatment with four first premolar extractions will be enrolled.
All patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either EM (n=16) group or the TSR (n=16) group.
Cone bean computed tomography will be taken before and after anterior retraction.
A blind observer will construct separate 3D models for maxillary and mandibular surfaces using the anterior cranial fossa to register models of before and after space closing.
Quantitative assessment of posterior anchorage loss and amount of anterior teeth retraction are the main outcomes.
The secondary outcomes are the inclination of the molars, canines and incisors.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
32
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Sergio Caetano, MSc
- Phone Number: +55(21)97912-5679
- Email: srocaetano@hotmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Flavia Artese, PhD
- Phone Number: +55(21)98155-4280
- Email: flaviaartese@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 20551-030
- Recruiting
- Faculdade de Odontologia - UERJ
-
Contact:
- Sergio Caetano, MSc
- Phone Number: +55(21)97912-5679
- Email: srocaetano@hotmail.com
-
Contact:
- Flavia Artese, PhD
- Phone Number: +55(21)98155-4280
- Email: flaviaartese@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 40 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Angle Class I malocclusion;
- Bimaxillary protrusion;
- Convex profile;
- All natural teeth present in the mouth;
- Absence of crowding or with negative discrepancy up to 4mm;
- Absence of vertical and transverse occlusal problems;
- Good oral health;
- Good general health.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Lack of time to attend consultations;
- Patients with severe systemic and psychological illness;
- Patients with parafunction (bruxism), reflux or eating disorders;
- Presence of periodontal disease;
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: En Masse Retraction
Group treated by retracting the six anterior teeth simultaneously.
|
After extraction of the four premolars the posterior teeth will be tied-together and the six anterior teeth will be retracted by sliding mechanics.
|
Active Comparator: Two-Step Retraction
Group treated by retracting the canines incisors in two different steps.
|
After extraction of the four premolars the posterior teeth will be tied-together and the canines will be retracted by sliding mechanics.
After the distalization of the canines they will be tied to the posterior teeth and the incisors will be retracted by sliding mechanics.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Anchorage loss
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Quantitative assessment of posterior anchorage loss between the two groups as measured by tomographic superimposition at the end of space closure.
|
12 months
|
Anterior teeth retraction
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Quantitative assessment of anterior teeth retraction between the two groups as measured by tomographic superimposition at the end of space closure.
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Molar inclination
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Quantitative assessment of molars inclination between the two groups as measured by tomographic superimposition at the end of space closure.
|
12 months
|
Canine inclination
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Quantitative assessment of canines inclination between the two groups as measured by tomographic superimposition at the end of space closure.
|
12 months
|
Incisors inclination
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Quantitative assessment of incisors inclination between the two groups as measured by tomographic superimposition at the end of space closure.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Jose Augusto M Miguel, PhD, Rio de Janeiro State University
- Principal Investigator: Sergio Caetano, MSc, Rio de Janeiro State University
- Study Director: Flavia Artese, PhD, Rio de Janeiro State University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Cevidanes LH, Styner MA, Proffit WR. Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 May;129(5):611-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.008.
- Heo W, Nahm DS, Baek SH. En masse retraction and two-step retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in adult Class I women. A comparison of anchorage loss. Angle Orthod. 2007 Nov;77(6):973-8. doi: 10.2319/111706-464.1.
- Ribeiro GL, Jacob HB. Understanding the basis of space closure in Orthodontics for a more efficient orthodontic treatment. Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Mar-Apr;21(2):115-25. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.115-125.sar.
- Solem RC, Marasco R, Guiterrez-Pulido L, Nielsen I, Kim SH, Nelson G. Three-dimensional soft-tissue and hard-tissue changes in the treatment of bimaxillary protrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):218-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.018.
- Xu TM, Zhang X, Oh HS, Boyd RL, Korn EL, Baumrind S. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Nov;138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.027.
- Schneider PP, Gandini Junior LG, Monini ADC, Pinto ADS, Kim KB. Comparison of anterior retraction and anchorage control between en masse retraction and two-step retraction: A randomized prospective clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2019 Mar;89(2):190-199. doi: 10.2319/051518-363.1. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
- Leonardi R, Annunziata A, Licciardello V, Barbato E. Soft tissue changes following the extraction of premolars in nongrowing patients with bimaxillary protrusion. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):211-6. doi: 10.2319/010709-16.1.
- Kojima Y, Fukui H. Numerical simulation of canine retraction by sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 May;127(5):542-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.007.
- Bennett JC, McLaughlin RP. Controlled space closure with a preadjusted appliance system. J Clin Orthod. 1990 Apr;24(4):251-60. No abstract available.
- Pervin S, Rolland S, Taylor G. En masse versus two-step retraction of the anterior segment. Evid Based Dent. 2018 Dec;19(4):111-112. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401343.
- Rizk MZ, Mohammed H, Ismael O, Bearn DR. Effectiveness of en masse versus two-step retraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod. 2018 Jan 5;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0196-7.
- Cevidanes LH, Bailey LJ, Tucker GR Jr, Styner MA, Mol A, Phillips CL, Proffit WR, Turvey T. Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005 Nov;34(6):369-75. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/17102411.
- Feldmann I, Bondemark L. Orthodontic anchorage: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2006 May;76(3):493-501. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0493:OA]2.0.CO;2.
- Geron S, Shpack N, Kandos S, Davidovitch M, Vardimon AD. Anchorage loss--a multifactorial response. Angle Orthod. 2003 Dec;73(6):730-7. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)0732.0.CO;2.
- Domingo-Clerigues M, Montiel-Company JM, Almerich-Silla JM, Garcia-Sanz V, Paredes-Gallardo V, Bellot-Arcis C. Changes in the alveolar bone thickness of maxillary incisors after orthodontic treatment involving extractions - A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Jan 1;11(1):e76-e84. doi: 10.4317/jced.55434. eCollection 2019 Jan.
- Keim RG. Space closure and anchorage control. J Clin Orthod. 2013 Mar;47(3):153-4. No abstract available.
- Keim RG. The challenge of bimaxillary protrusion. J Clin Orthod. 2017 Jun;51(6):315-316. No abstract available.
- Liu Y, Olszewski R, Alexandroni ES, Enciso R, Xu T, Mah JK. The validity of in vivo tooth volume determinations from cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):160-6. doi: 10.2319/121608-639.1.
- Shearn BN, Woods MG. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of lower first and second premolar extraction effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Mar;117(3):351-61. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70240-x.
- Ong HB, Woods MG. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of maxillary first and second premolar extraction effects. Angle Orthod. 2001 Apr;71(2):90-102. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)0712.0.CO;2.
- Williams R, Hosila FJ. The effect of different extraction sites upon incisor retraction. Am J Orthod. 1976 Apr;69(4):388-410. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(76)90208-6.
- Yoshida N, Koga Y, Mimaki N, Kobayashi K. In vivo determination of the centres of resistance of maxillary anterior teeth subjected to retraction forces. Eur J Orthod. 2001 Oct;23(5):529-34. doi: 10.1093/ejo/23.5.529.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 3, 2019
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
April 1, 2020
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 3, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
April 4, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 5, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 3, 2019
Last Verified
April 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 04186818.2.0000.5259
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bimaxillary Protrusion
-
Future University in EgyptCompletedBimaxillary ProtrusionEgypt
-
Future University in EgyptCompletedBimaxillary ProtrusionEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownBimaxillary ProtrusionEgypt
-
Future University in EgyptCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedBimaxillary ProtrusionEgypt
-
Future University in EgyptActive, not recruitingBimaxillary ProtrusionEgypt
-
Future University in EgyptActive, not recruitingBimaxillary ProtrusionEgypt
-
Future University in EgyptCompletedBimaxillary ProtrusionEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownEn-masse Retraction , Class I Bimaxillary Protrusion
-
Suez Canal UniversityCompletedBimaxillary Protrusion | Dental MalocclusionEgypt
Clinical Trials on En masse anterior teeth retraction
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedClass II Division 1 MalocclusionSyrian Arab Republic
-
Future University in EgyptCompletedBimaxillary ProtrusionEgypt
-
Future University in EgyptActive, not recruitingBimaxillary ProtrusionEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedBimaxillary ProtrusionEgypt
-
Beni-Suef UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Future University in EgyptCompletedBimaxillary ProtrusionEgypt
-
Future University in EgyptActive, not recruitingBimaxillary ProtrusionEgypt
-
Dow University of Health SciencesCompletedEn-masse Retraction to Two- Steps RetractionPakistan
-
Dow University of Health SciencesCompletedVarying Heights of Power Arm During en Masse RetractionPakistan
-
Future University in EgyptCompleted