Safety and Performance of Journey II BCS Total Knee System Patient Reported Outcome Measures (JIIPROMS)

November 9, 2020 updated by: Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Safety and Performance of Journey II BCS Total Knee System. A Retrospective, Multicenter Study. Patient Reported Outcomes Measures

Safety and Performance of Journey II BCS Total Knee System. A Retrospective, Multicenter Study. Patient Reported Outcome Measures.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
600

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • UZ Leuven
  • New Zealand
      • Hamilton, New Zealand, 3204
        • Anglesea Clinic Orthopaedics
  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Department of Orthopaedics, University of Colorado Denver
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Hospital for Special Surgery
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37922
        • Tennessee Orthopaedic Clinics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects who received the Journey II BCS Total Knee System

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject received primary uni- or bi-lateral total knee arthroplasty with the Journey II BCS Total Knee System for approved indication;
  • The TKA occurred at least 12 weeks prior to enrollment
  • Subject records contain Patient Reported Outcome data obtained ≤3 months prior to as well as ≥6 months post-enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject received the JOURNEY II BCS Total Knee System on the affected knee as a revision for a previously failed total or unicondylar knee arthroplasty

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Revision of one or more study device components
Time Frame: Implantation through study completion, approximately 8 years
We are measuring the number of revision cases
Implantation through study completion, approximately 8 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health care utilization: Rehabilitation
Time Frame: Implantation through study completion, approximately 8 years
Number of sessions and duration of rehabilitation in weeks
Implantation through study completion, approximately 8 years
Return to Work
Time Frame: Implantation through study completion, approximately 8 years
Changes in employment status will be recorded with the date on which the change occurred and the change status.
Implantation through study completion, approximately 8 years
Knee Society Score (KSS)
Time Frame: Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
Knee Society Score (KSS), a physician- and self-administered questionnaire consisting of several items to measure the outcomes; in this study, the following KOOS scores ranging from 0 to 100 were analyzed: Symptoms Score, Satisfaction Score, Expectation Score, Walking and Standing Score, Standard Activity Score, Advanced Activity Score, Discretionary Activity Score, and Functional Activities Score. Lower KSS scores indicated worse knee conditions.
Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), a self-administered psychometric response instrument to evaluate subject-reported assessment of pain in each knee. There are multiple ways to present VAS scores; in this study, the numerical score ranged from 0 to 100 was used, with the higher score corresponding to the worse pain.
Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index
Time Frame: Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index, a self-administered questionnaire consisting of several items (grouped into symptoms, function, daily living, pain, etc) to measure the outcomes using the scores: Total WOMAC score (sum of all scores), WOMAC pain score (range 0 to 20), WOMAC stiffness score (range 0 to 8), and WOMAC physical function score (range of 0 to 68). The higher WOMAC scores corresponded to worse outcomes.
Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
Total Knee Assessment Score
Time Frame: Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
Total Knee Assessment score is a self-administered questionnaire comprising multiple-choice questions regarding subjects' knee-related pain and limitations in ability to work, sports, and other daily living activities. In this study, the numbers and percentages of subjects answering each multiple-choice question were summarized. The higher percentage of subjects giving an answer indicating a higher level of limitations was indicative of worse outcomes.
Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
Oxford Knee Assessment (OKS)
Time Frame: Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
Oxford Knee Assessment (OKS) is a self-administered questionnaire comprising multiple-choice questions aimed to grade subjects' ability to perform daily activities. The overall score is the sum of all items and range from 0 to 48, with a higher score corresponding to better outcomes.
Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritic Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritic Outcome Score (KOOS) is a self -administered joint-specific questionnaire comprising questions regarding subject's symptoms, knee stiffness, pain, function and daily living, function and sports and recreational activities, and quality of life; in this study, the following KOOS scores ranging from 0 to 100 (with a score of 0 indicating the worst possible symptoms) were analyzed: Pain Score, Other Symptoms Score, Function in Daily Living Score, Function in Sport and Recreation Score, and Quality of Life Score.
Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritic Outcome Score Jr (KOOS Jr)
Time Frame: Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritic Outcome Score Jr (KOOS Jr) is a shorter self-administered alternative to KOOS focusing on joint pain, stiffness, and daily living and allowing for faster completion by the subject. In this study, the KOOS Interval Score ranging from 0 to 100 was analyzed (with a score of 0 indicating the worst possible symptoms).
Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
SF-12 Version 1
Time Frame: Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
SF-12 Version 1 is a self-administered multipurpose (not aimed to specific disease group) short form survey with questions selected from the longer SF-36 Health Survey and comprising the following scores: Physical Health Composite Score (range 0 for the worst health to 100 for the best health) and Mental Health Composite Score (range 0 for the worst health to 100 for the best health)
Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michael R. Dayton, MD, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Colorado Denver
  • Principal Investigator: David J. Mayman, MD, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
  • Principal Investigator: Harold E. Cates, MD, Tennessee Orthopaedic Clinics
  • Principal Investigator: Hilde Vandenneucker, MD, UZ Leuven
  • Principal Investigator: Peter Black, MBBCh, Anglesea Clinic Orthopaedics

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 19, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 8, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 8, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 2, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 9, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 16-4049-08B

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings