- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03903731
Safety and Performance of Journey II BCS Total Knee System Patient Reported Outcome Measures (JIIPROMS)
November 9, 2020 updated by: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Safety and Performance of Journey II BCS Total Knee System. A Retrospective, Multicenter Study. Patient Reported Outcomes Measures
Safety and Performance of Journey II BCS Total Knee System.
A Retrospective, Multicenter Study.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
600
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Leuven, Belgium, 3000
- UZ Leuven
-
-
-
-
-
Hamilton, New Zealand, 3204
- Anglesea Clinic Orthopaedics
-
-
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Colorado Denver
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10021
- Hospital for Special Surgery
-
-
Tennessee
-
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37922
- Tennessee Orthopaedic Clinics
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- ADULT
- OLDER_ADULT
- CHILD
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Subjects who received the Journey II BCS Total Knee System
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject received primary uni- or bi-lateral total knee arthroplasty with the Journey II BCS Total Knee System for approved indication;
- The TKA occurred at least 12 weeks prior to enrollment
- Subject records contain Patient Reported Outcome data obtained ≤3 months prior to as well as ≥6 months post-enrollment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject received the JOURNEY II BCS Total Knee System on the affected knee as a revision for a previously failed total or unicondylar knee arthroplasty
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Revision of one or more study device components
Time Frame: Implantation through study completion, approximately 8 years
|
We are measuring the number of revision cases
|
Implantation through study completion, approximately 8 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Health care utilization: Rehabilitation
Time Frame: Implantation through study completion, approximately 8 years
|
Number of sessions and duration of rehabilitation in weeks
|
Implantation through study completion, approximately 8 years
|
Return to Work
Time Frame: Implantation through study completion, approximately 8 years
|
Changes in employment status will be recorded with the date on which the change occurred and the change status.
|
Implantation through study completion, approximately 8 years
|
Knee Society Score (KSS)
Time Frame: Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
|
Knee Society Score (KSS), a physician- and self-administered questionnaire consisting of several items to measure the outcomes; in this study, the following KOOS scores ranging from 0 to 100 were analyzed: Symptoms Score, Satisfaction Score, Expectation Score, Walking and Standing Score, Standard Activity Score, Advanced Activity Score, Discretionary Activity Score, and Functional Activities Score.
Lower KSS scores indicated worse knee conditions.
|
Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), a self-administered psychometric response instrument to evaluate subject-reported assessment of pain in each knee.
There are multiple ways to present VAS scores; in this study, the numerical score ranged from 0 to 100 was used, with the higher score corresponding to the worse pain.
|
Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
|
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index
Time Frame: Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
|
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index, a self-administered questionnaire consisting of several items (grouped into symptoms, function, daily living, pain, etc) to measure the outcomes using the scores: Total WOMAC score (sum of all scores), WOMAC pain score (range 0 to 20), WOMAC stiffness score (range 0 to 8), and WOMAC physical function score (range of 0 to 68).
The higher WOMAC scores corresponded to worse outcomes.
|
Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
|
Total Knee Assessment Score
Time Frame: Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
|
Total Knee Assessment score is a self-administered questionnaire comprising multiple-choice questions regarding subjects' knee-related pain and limitations in ability to work, sports, and other daily living activities.
In this study, the numbers and percentages of subjects answering each multiple-choice question were summarized.
The higher percentage of subjects giving an answer indicating a higher level of limitations was indicative of worse outcomes.
|
Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
|
Oxford Knee Assessment (OKS)
Time Frame: Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
|
Oxford Knee Assessment (OKS) is a self-administered questionnaire comprising multiple-choice questions aimed to grade subjects' ability to perform daily activities.
The overall score is the sum of all items and range from 0 to 48, with a higher score corresponding to better outcomes.
|
Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritic Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritic Outcome Score (KOOS) is a self -administered joint-specific questionnaire comprising questions regarding subject's symptoms, knee stiffness, pain, function and daily living, function and sports and recreational activities, and quality of life; in this study, the following KOOS scores ranging from 0 to 100 (with a score of 0 indicating the worst possible symptoms) were analyzed: Pain Score, Other Symptoms Score, Function in Daily Living Score, Function in Sport and Recreation Score, and Quality of Life Score.
|
Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritic Outcome Score Jr (KOOS Jr)
Time Frame: Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritic Outcome Score Jr (KOOS Jr) is a shorter self-administered alternative to KOOS focusing on joint pain, stiffness, and daily living and allowing for faster completion by the subject.
In this study, the KOOS Interval Score ranging from 0 to 100 was analyzed (with a score of 0 indicating the worst possible symptoms).
|
Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
|
SF-12 Version 1
Time Frame: Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
|
SF-12 Version 1 is a self-administered multipurpose (not aimed to specific disease group) short form survey with questions selected from the longer SF-36 Health Survey and comprising the following scores: Physical Health Composite Score (range 0 for the worst health to 100 for the best health) and Mental Health Composite Score (range 0 for the worst health to 100 for the best health)
|
Baseline through last study visit, approximately 8 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael R. Dayton, MD, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Colorado Denver
- Principal Investigator: David J. Mayman, MD, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
- Principal Investigator: Harold E. Cates, MD, Tennessee Orthopaedic Clinics
- Principal Investigator: Hilde Vandenneucker, MD, UZ Leuven
- Principal Investigator: Peter Black, MBBCh, Anglesea Clinic Orthopaedics
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
July 19, 2018
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
August 8, 2019
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
August 8, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 26, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 2, 2019
First Posted (ACTUAL)
April 4, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
November 12, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 9, 2020
Last Verified
November 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 16-4049-08B
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Journey II BCS Total Knee System
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.Nor ConsultCompletedJourney II CR Total Knee SystemUnited States
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.Nor Consult, LLCCompletedJourney II XR Total Knee SystemUnited States
-
Aesculap Implant SystemsTerminatedPatients With Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the VEGA SystemUnited States
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.Withdrawn
-
SPR Therapeutics, Inc.United States Department of DefenseActive, not recruitingPostoperative Pain | Total Knee Arthroplasty | Total Knee Replacement | Partial Knee ReplacementUnited States
-
University of SalfordStockport NHS Foundation TrustSuspendedOutcome After Total Knee ArthroplastyUnited Kingdom
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.CompletedTotal Knee ArthroplastyUnited States, Belgium, Switzerland
-
Rothman Institute OrthopaedicsSharpe-Strumia Research FoundationUnknownFlexion Contracture Following Total Knee ReplacementUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruitingTotal Knee Arthroplasty (Postoperative Pain) | Total Hip Arthroplasty (Postoperative Pain)United States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedTotal Knee Arthroplasty (Postoperative Pain) | Total Hip Arthroplasty(Postoperative Pain)United States
Clinical Trials on Total knee arthroplasty with Journey II BCS Total Knee System
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.Active, not recruitingOsteoarthritis, KneeUnited States
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.WithdrawnArthroplasty | Knee | ReplacementSingapore, China, India
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.CompletedTotal Knee ArthroplastyUnited States, Belgium, Switzerland
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.Nor ConsultCompletedJourney II CR Total Knee SystemUnited States
-
The University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleSmith & Nephew, Inc.CompletedOsteoarthritis, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeUnited States
-
The University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleRecruiting
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.Active, not recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Rheumatoid Vasculitis With Rheumatoid Arthritis of Knee | Unilateral Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis of Knee | Degenerative Arthritis Peripheral Joint | Failed Osteotomies | Failed Unicompartmental ReplacementUnited States
-
University Hospital, GhentUniversity GhentCompletedOsteoarthritisBelgium
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteMicroPort Orthopedics Inc.RecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Total Knee Arthroplasty | Radiostereometric AnalysisCanada
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityUnknown