Comparison Between the Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Psoas Compartment Block in Hip Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Talas
-
Kayseri, Talas, Turkey, 38039
- Sibel Seckin Pehlivan
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I- ASA II Patients
-
Exclusion Criteria:
- history of allergy to the study medication
- refusal to participate
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Psoas compartment block group (PCB)
Single- shot ultrasound (Esaote Mylab30) guided PCB with 15 ml 0.25% bupivacain ( Marcain 0.5%, Astra zeneca, Turkey) at the L4 vertebral level will performed preoperatively to patients in the PCB group (Group I).
|
Psoas Compartment Block will perform preoperative to all patients in Group I. Patients in all groups will provide with intravenous patient- controlled analgesia device containing morphine for postoperative analgesia.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Erector spinae plane block group (ESP)
Single- shot ultrasound (Esaote Mylab30) guided ESP block with 15 ml 0.25% ( Marcain 0.5%, Astra zeneca, Turkey) at the L4 vertebral level will performed preoperatively to patients in the ESP group (Group II).
|
ESP Block will perform preoperative to all patients in ESP block group.
Patients in all groups will provide with intravenous patient- controlled analgesia device containing morphine for postoperative analgesia.
|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: The Control group
The Control group receive no intervention ( Group III).
|
Control group will receive no intervention.
Patients in all groups will provide with intravenous patient- controlled analgesia device containing morphine for postoperative analgesia.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
opioid consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
In the recovery room, all patients will given a patient- controlled analgesia device containing morphine 0.5 mg/ml, set to deliver a 1mg bolus dose of morphine with an 15 min lockout time and 6 mg 1 h limit.Total morphine consumption during the 24 hours postoperative period will recorded at 5 times intervals ( 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 hours).
|
24 hours after surgery
|
|
Verbal analog Pain Scores on rest and movement
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
A Research assistant, blinded to the group allocation, interviewed patients and collected data at 5 times intervals ( 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, hours) in the 24 hours postoperatively.
Patients were asked to rate their pain using verbal analog scale, where 0= no pain and 10= worst pain possible.
|
24 hours after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
incidences of adverse effects (like nausea and vomiting)
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
incidences of nausea and vomiting during the 24 hours postoperative period will recorded at 6 time intervals ( 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 hours).
|
24 hours after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Sibel Pehlivan, TC Erciyes University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Touray ST, de Leeuw MA, Zuurmond WW, Perez RS. Psoas compartment block for lower extremity surgery: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Dec;101(6):750-60. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen298. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
- Tsui BCH, Fonseca A, Munshey F, McFadyen G, Caruso TJ. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block: A pooled review of 242 cases. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Mar;53:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
- Tulgar S, Ermis MN, Ozer Z. Combination of lumbar erector spinae plane block and transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for surgical anaesthesia in hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;62(10):802-805. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_230_18.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2019/98
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.