- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03904095
Comparison Between the Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Psoas Compartment Block in Hip Surgery
April 4, 2019 updated by: Sibel Seçkin Pehlivan, TC Erciyes University
To evaluate the ability of Erector spina Plane block and Psoas compartment block to decrease postoperative pain and analgesia requirements in patients undergoing hip surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Detailed Description
Erector spina Plane block or Psoas compartment block will performed with guided ultrasound at L4 Transverse process level would lead to adequate postoperative analgesia ,in total hip arthroplasty surgeries.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
105
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Talas
-
Kayseri, Talas, Turkey, 38039
- Sibel Seckin Pehlivan
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I- ASA II Patients
-
Exclusion Criteria:
- history of allergy to the study medication
- refusal to participate
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Psoas compartment block group (PCB)
Single- shot ultrasound (Esaote Mylab30) guided PCB with 15 ml 0.25% bupivacain ( Marcain 0.5%, Astra zeneca, Turkey) at the L4 vertebral level will performed preoperatively to patients in the PCB group (Group I).
|
Psoas Compartment Block will perform preoperative to all patients in Group I. Patients in all groups will provide with intravenous patient- controlled analgesia device containing morphine for postoperative analgesia.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Erector spinae plane block group (ESP)
Single- shot ultrasound (Esaote Mylab30) guided ESP block with 15 ml 0.25% ( Marcain 0.5%, Astra zeneca, Turkey) at the L4 vertebral level will performed preoperatively to patients in the ESP group (Group II).
|
ESP Block will perform preoperative to all patients in ESP block group.
Patients in all groups will provide with intravenous patient- controlled analgesia device containing morphine for postoperative analgesia.
|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: The Control group
The Control group receive no intervention ( Group III).
|
Control group will receive no intervention.
Patients in all groups will provide with intravenous patient- controlled analgesia device containing morphine for postoperative analgesia.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
opioid consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
In the recovery room, all patients will given a patient- controlled analgesia device containing morphine 0.5 mg/ml, set to deliver a 1mg bolus dose of morphine with an 15 min lockout time and 6 mg 1 h limit.Total morphine consumption during the 24 hours postoperative period will recorded at 5 times intervals ( 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 hours).
|
24 hours after surgery
|
|
Verbal analog Pain Scores on rest and movement
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
A Research assistant, blinded to the group allocation, interviewed patients and collected data at 5 times intervals ( 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, hours) in the 24 hours postoperatively.
Patients were asked to rate their pain using verbal analog scale, where 0= no pain and 10= worst pain possible.
|
24 hours after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
incidences of adverse effects (like nausea and vomiting)
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
incidences of nausea and vomiting during the 24 hours postoperative period will recorded at 6 time intervals ( 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 hours).
|
24 hours after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Sibel Pehlivan, TC Erciyes University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Touray ST, de Leeuw MA, Zuurmond WW, Perez RS. Psoas compartment block for lower extremity surgery: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Dec;101(6):750-60. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen298. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
- Tsui BCH, Fonseca A, Munshey F, McFadyen G, Caruso TJ. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block: A pooled review of 242 cases. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Mar;53:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
- Tulgar S, Ermis MN, Ozer Z. Combination of lumbar erector spinae plane block and transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for surgical anaesthesia in hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;62(10):802-805. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_230_18.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
February 1, 2019
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
February 1, 2022
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
February 1, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 3, 2019
First Posted (ACTUAL)
April 4, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
April 8, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 4, 2019
Last Verified
April 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2019/98
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will be available within 12 months of study completion
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Data accept requests will be reviewed by an external independent Review Panel.Requesters will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.