Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Interscalene Nerve Block

May 8, 2023 updated by: Adam Schumaier, University of Cincinnati

Randomized Trial Comparing Interscalene Nerve Block to Liposomal Bupivacaine For Pain Management Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (RTSA)

The aim of this study is to compare two different pain management interventions in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The two interventions are 1) pre-operative interscalene nerve block and 2) intraoperative injection of liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel, Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Parsippany NJ). Specifically, the primary aims of this study are to compare these two interventions on the following: post-operative opioid consumption, pain scores, and patient satisfaction. Additionally, the investigators want to determine if psychological factors, catastrophizing and resilience, are associated with post-operative pain control and satisfaction. The investigators' hypothesis is that the two interventions will have similar pain control efficacy and that the liposomal bupivacaine group will experience faster post-operative recovery, earlier discharge, and improved satisfaction. The investigators also expect patient catastrophizing and resilience to significantly predict the degree of post-operative pain and level of patient satisfaction.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
76

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267
        • University of Cincinnati Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients who are older than 18 years
  • patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • inability to provide informed consent
  • deemed unreliable for follow-up survey completion
  • individuals who do not speak English
  • those who have an allergy to the study medications (ropivicaine, bupivicaine) or have clinically significant hepatic disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Liposomal Bupivacaine
Patients in this group will receive a single intra-operative injection of liposomal bupivacaine near the surgical site (40 ml total: consisting of 20 ml 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine and 20 ml normal saline).
Drug: Exparel
Patients will receive a local injection of liposomal bupivacaine near the end of their shoulder arthroplasty operation.
Other: Interscalene Nerve Block
Patients in this group will receive a single pre-operative interscalene nerve block in the neck/shoulder consisting of 30 ml 0.5% ropivacaine.
Procedure: Interscalene Nerve Block
Patients will undergo a pre-operative interscalene nerve block performed by the anesthesiology team.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid Consumption
Time Frame: 72 hours post-operatively
Post-operative use of opioid pain medications, measured in morphine equivalents (higher scores are worse)
72 hours post-operatively
Visual Analog Scale Pain Scores
Time Frame: 72 hours post-operatively
Post-operative level of pain measured from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
72 hours post-operatively
Patient Satisfaction: Rating
Time Frame: 72 hours post-operatively
Rating of satisfaction with post-operative pain management from 0 (least satisfied) to 10 (most satisfied)
72 hours post-operatively
Relationship between catastrophizing, pain, and patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Catastrophizing will be measured pre-operatively
The effect of patient catastrophizing (measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale) on post-operative pain control and satisfaction. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale measures how individuals psychologically respond to pain and hardship, and it ranges from a minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 52. Higher scores on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale indicate more catastrophic thinking. The patients' catastrophizing scores will be correlated with their post-operative pain scores and their satisfaction scores. A correlation closer to -1 or 1 (correlations range from -1 to 1) indicates a stronger relationship between catastrophizing with pain control and satisfaction.
Catastrophizing will be measured pre-operatively
Relationship between resilience, pain, and patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Resilience will be measured pre-operatively
The effect of patient resilience (measured using the Brief Resilience Scale) on post-operative pain control and satisfaction. The Brief Resilience Scale measures how individuals psychologically respond to pain and hardship, and it ranges from a minimum score of 1 to a maximum score of 5. Higher scores on the Brief Resilience Scale indicate greater resilience. The patients' resilience scores will be correlated with their post-operative pain scores and their satisfaction scores. A correlation closer to -1 or 1 (correlations range from -1 to 1) indicates a stronger relationship between resilience with pain control and satisfaction.
Resilience will be measured pre-operatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Cincinnati

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Adam Schumaier, MD, University of Cincinnati, Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 5, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2017-7698

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings