Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Interscalene Nerve Block

May 8, 2023 updated by: Adam Schumaier, University of Cincinnati

Randomized Trial Comparing Interscalene Nerve Block to Liposomal Bupivacaine For Pain Management Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (RTSA)

The aim of this study is to compare two different pain management interventions in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The two interventions are 1) pre-operative interscalene nerve block and 2) intraoperative injection of liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel, Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Parsippany NJ). Specifically, the primary aims of this study are to compare these two interventions on the following: post-operative opioid consumption, pain scores, and patient satisfaction. Additionally, the investigators want to determine if psychological factors, catastrophizing and resilience, are associated with post-operative pain control and satisfaction. The investigators' hypothesis is that the two interventions will have similar pain control efficacy and that the liposomal bupivacaine group will experience faster post-operative recovery, earlier discharge, and improved satisfaction. The investigators also expect patient catastrophizing and resilience to significantly predict the degree of post-operative pain and level of patient satisfaction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

76

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267
        • University of Cincinnati Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients who are older than 18 years
  • patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • inability to provide informed consent
  • deemed unreliable for follow-up survey completion
  • individuals who do not speak English
  • those who have an allergy to the study medications (ropivicaine, bupivicaine) or have clinically significant hepatic disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Liposomal Bupivacaine
Patients in this group will receive a single intra-operative injection of liposomal bupivacaine near the surgical site (40 ml total: consisting of 20 ml 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine and 20 ml normal saline).
Patients will receive a local injection of liposomal bupivacaine near the end of their shoulder arthroplasty operation.
Other: Interscalene Nerve Block
Patients in this group will receive a single pre-operative interscalene nerve block in the neck/shoulder consisting of 30 ml 0.5% ropivacaine.
Patients will undergo a pre-operative interscalene nerve block performed by the anesthesiology team.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid Consumption
Time Frame: 72 hours post-operatively
Post-operative use of opioid pain medications, measured in morphine equivalents (higher scores are worse)
72 hours post-operatively
Visual Analog Scale Pain Scores
Time Frame: 72 hours post-operatively
Post-operative level of pain measured from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
72 hours post-operatively
Patient Satisfaction: Rating
Time Frame: 72 hours post-operatively
Rating of satisfaction with post-operative pain management from 0 (least satisfied) to 10 (most satisfied)
72 hours post-operatively
Relationship between catastrophizing, pain, and patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Catastrophizing will be measured pre-operatively
The effect of patient catastrophizing (measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale) on post-operative pain control and satisfaction. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale measures how individuals psychologically respond to pain and hardship, and it ranges from a minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 52. Higher scores on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale indicate more catastrophic thinking. The patients' catastrophizing scores will be correlated with their post-operative pain scores and their satisfaction scores. A correlation closer to -1 or 1 (correlations range from -1 to 1) indicates a stronger relationship between catastrophizing with pain control and satisfaction.
Catastrophizing will be measured pre-operatively
Relationship between resilience, pain, and patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Resilience will be measured pre-operatively
The effect of patient resilience (measured using the Brief Resilience Scale) on post-operative pain control and satisfaction. The Brief Resilience Scale measures how individuals psychologically respond to pain and hardship, and it ranges from a minimum score of 1 to a maximum score of 5. Higher scores on the Brief Resilience Scale indicate greater resilience. The patients' resilience scores will be correlated with their post-operative pain scores and their satisfaction scores. A correlation closer to -1 or 1 (correlations range from -1 to 1) indicates a stronger relationship between resilience with pain control and satisfaction.
Resilience will be measured pre-operatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adam Schumaier, MD, University of Cincinnati, Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017-7698

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Exparel

3
Subscribe