Adaptive Preventive Intervention for College Alcohol Use
An Adaptive Preventive Intervention to Optimize the Transition From Universal to Indicated Resources for College Student Alcohol Use
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55415
- University of Minnesota
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Incoming college students aged 18-21 at the University of Minnesota will be eligible and randomly selected for participation.
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Assessment Only
Control
|
|
|
Experimental: Early-college Universal
Prior to beginning their first semester of college, incoming students will receive personalized normative feedback (PNF) comparing their experiences to other college students their age, as well as up to 4 self-monitoring surveys over the course of the semester.
|
Personalized normative feedback is generated by a process in which: (1) baseline surveys gather respondent information; (2) a computer program links the data with algorithms to select feedback messages; (3) a format for feedback presentation is specified; and (4) the program generates output.
Norms will focus on prevalence of drinking, consuming 4/5+ drinks, total number of drinks consumed each week, and maximum drinks consumed.
Normative information will be from the national Monitoring the Future (MTF) study college student sample and the University of Minnesota Twin Cities campus.
Students will be sent a link to a website where they see their own personal responses in the feedback.
Feedback will detail quantity and frequency of drinking (a) reported by the participant him/herself, (b) according to the participant's perception of the descriptive norm for drinking quantity and frequency for the reference group, and (c) reflecting the actual descriptive norm for the reference group.
Students will be asked to self-report their alcohol use every 2 weeks in response to two main questions (frequency of 4/5+ drinking in the past 2 weeks, frequency of past 2-week 8/10+ drinking), as well as consequences of their drinking.
The therapeutic role of SM is two-fold.
First, SM facilitates deliberate attention to and reflection on the person's actions, the conditions under which these actions occur, and their consequences (Bandura, 1998; Kanfer, 1970).
Hence, SM of drinking behaviors and consequences has the potential to promote awareness of problematic drinking and need for health services.
Second, SM affords the opportunity to obtain ongoing information concerning the target behavior, which can be used to inform timely intervention decisions (Nahum-Shani et al., 2016)
|
|
Experimental: Early-college No Coach (automated email)
Students from the early-college universal arm, who flag on one of the self-monitoring surveys are invited to engage in a web-based resource or in-person consultation to improve well-being, with a particular emphasis on alcohol use.
|
Personalized normative feedback is generated by a process in which: (1) baseline surveys gather respondent information; (2) a computer program links the data with algorithms to select feedback messages; (3) a format for feedback presentation is specified; and (4) the program generates output.
Norms will focus on prevalence of drinking, consuming 4/5+ drinks, total number of drinks consumed each week, and maximum drinks consumed.
Normative information will be from the national Monitoring the Future (MTF) study college student sample and the University of Minnesota Twin Cities campus.
Students will be sent a link to a website where they see their own personal responses in the feedback.
Feedback will detail quantity and frequency of drinking (a) reported by the participant him/herself, (b) according to the participant's perception of the descriptive norm for drinking quantity and frequency for the reference group, and (c) reflecting the actual descriptive norm for the reference group.
Students will be asked to self-report their alcohol use every 2 weeks in response to two main questions (frequency of 4/5+ drinking in the past 2 weeks, frequency of past 2-week 8/10+ drinking), as well as consequences of their drinking.
The therapeutic role of SM is two-fold.
First, SM facilitates deliberate attention to and reflection on the person's actions, the conditions under which these actions occur, and their consequences (Bandura, 1998; Kanfer, 1970).
Hence, SM of drinking behaviors and consequences has the potential to promote awareness of problematic drinking and need for health services.
Second, SM affords the opportunity to obtain ongoing information concerning the target behavior, which can be used to inform timely intervention decisions (Nahum-Shani et al., 2016)
Web-BASICS is delivered online and responds to individual participant input with the same motivational information and feedback as used in the in-person BASICS intervention.
In-person BASICS content (Dimeff et.
al., 1999) was developed for online use in studies conducted by Drs.
Larimer and Lee (e.g., LaBrie et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2014; Neighbors et al., 2012a).
Web-BASICS feedback contains text and graphical feedback regarding students' reported drinking quantity, frequency, peak alcohol consumption, and blood alcohol content (BAC), risks for alcohol problems based on participant family history and consumption patterns, protective behaviors the participant already uses and others he/she might consider, and a tips page with a BAC chart, information on reduced-risk drinking, and where to get more information.
Participants can print and/or view their individualized content online for up to 3 months.
Other Names:
A health promotion consultation via a campus clinic is a confidential exploration of student drug and alcohol use.
Health Promotion Consultants help students assess how their alcohol and other substance use affects their life and learn how to make healthier decisions.
|
|
Experimental: Early-college Coach
Students from the early-college universal arm, who flag on one of the self-monitoring surveys are invited to correspond with an online health coach who will use motivational interviewing strategies to encourage engagement in a web-based resource or in-person consultation to improve wellbeing, with a particular emphasis on alcohol use.
|
Personalized normative feedback is generated by a process in which: (1) baseline surveys gather respondent information; (2) a computer program links the data with algorithms to select feedback messages; (3) a format for feedback presentation is specified; and (4) the program generates output.
Norms will focus on prevalence of drinking, consuming 4/5+ drinks, total number of drinks consumed each week, and maximum drinks consumed.
Normative information will be from the national Monitoring the Future (MTF) study college student sample and the University of Minnesota Twin Cities campus.
Students will be sent a link to a website where they see their own personal responses in the feedback.
Feedback will detail quantity and frequency of drinking (a) reported by the participant him/herself, (b) according to the participant's perception of the descriptive norm for drinking quantity and frequency for the reference group, and (c) reflecting the actual descriptive norm for the reference group.
Students will be asked to self-report their alcohol use every 2 weeks in response to two main questions (frequency of 4/5+ drinking in the past 2 weeks, frequency of past 2-week 8/10+ drinking), as well as consequences of their drinking.
The therapeutic role of SM is two-fold.
First, SM facilitates deliberate attention to and reflection on the person's actions, the conditions under which these actions occur, and their consequences (Bandura, 1998; Kanfer, 1970).
Hence, SM of drinking behaviors and consequences has the potential to promote awareness of problematic drinking and need for health services.
Second, SM affords the opportunity to obtain ongoing information concerning the target behavior, which can be used to inform timely intervention decisions (Nahum-Shani et al., 2016)
Web-BASICS is delivered online and responds to individual participant input with the same motivational information and feedback as used in the in-person BASICS intervention.
In-person BASICS content (Dimeff et.
al., 1999) was developed for online use in studies conducted by Drs.
Larimer and Lee (e.g., LaBrie et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2014; Neighbors et al., 2012a).
Web-BASICS feedback contains text and graphical feedback regarding students' reported drinking quantity, frequency, peak alcohol consumption, and blood alcohol content (BAC), risks for alcohol problems based on participant family history and consumption patterns, protective behaviors the participant already uses and others he/she might consider, and a tips page with a BAC chart, information on reduced-risk drinking, and where to get more information.
Participants can print and/or view their individualized content online for up to 3 months.
Other Names:
A health promotion consultation via a campus clinic is a confidential exploration of student drug and alcohol use.
Health Promotion Consultants help students assess how their alcohol and other substance use affects their life and learn how to make healthier decisions.
A health coach will correspond with students via a secure online chat platform, utilizing motivational interviewing strategies to encourage students to consider their values and goals, the possibility of behavior change, and available services.
The goal of the dialogue is to motivate the student to access alcohol use interventions (Web-BASICS or an in-person health promotion consultation).
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Later-college Universal
After beginning their first semester of college, students will receive personalized normative feedback (PNF) comparing their experiences to other college students their age, as well as up to 4 self-monitoring surveys over the course of the semester.
|
Personalized normative feedback is generated by a process in which: (1) baseline surveys gather respondent information; (2) a computer program links the data with algorithms to select feedback messages; (3) a format for feedback presentation is specified; and (4) the program generates output.
Norms will focus on prevalence of drinking, consuming 4/5+ drinks, total number of drinks consumed each week, and maximum drinks consumed.
Normative information will be from the national Monitoring the Future (MTF) study college student sample and the University of Minnesota Twin Cities campus.
Students will be sent a link to a website where they see their own personal responses in the feedback.
Feedback will detail quantity and frequency of drinking (a) reported by the participant him/herself, (b) according to the participant's perception of the descriptive norm for drinking quantity and frequency for the reference group, and (c) reflecting the actual descriptive norm for the reference group.
Students will be asked to self-report their alcohol use every 2 weeks in response to two main questions (frequency of 4/5+ drinking in the past 2 weeks, frequency of past 2-week 8/10+ drinking), as well as consequences of their drinking.
The therapeutic role of SM is two-fold.
First, SM facilitates deliberate attention to and reflection on the person's actions, the conditions under which these actions occur, and their consequences (Bandura, 1998; Kanfer, 1970).
Hence, SM of drinking behaviors and consequences has the potential to promote awareness of problematic drinking and need for health services.
Second, SM affords the opportunity to obtain ongoing information concerning the target behavior, which can be used to inform timely intervention decisions (Nahum-Shani et al., 2016)
|
|
Experimental: Later-college No Coach (automated email)
Students from the later-college universal arm, who flag on one of the self-monitoring surveys are invited to engage in a web-based resource or in-person consultation to improve wellbeing, with a particular emphasis on alcohol use.
|
Personalized normative feedback is generated by a process in which: (1) baseline surveys gather respondent information; (2) a computer program links the data with algorithms to select feedback messages; (3) a format for feedback presentation is specified; and (4) the program generates output.
Norms will focus on prevalence of drinking, consuming 4/5+ drinks, total number of drinks consumed each week, and maximum drinks consumed.
Normative information will be from the national Monitoring the Future (MTF) study college student sample and the University of Minnesota Twin Cities campus.
Students will be sent a link to a website where they see their own personal responses in the feedback.
Feedback will detail quantity and frequency of drinking (a) reported by the participant him/herself, (b) according to the participant's perception of the descriptive norm for drinking quantity and frequency for the reference group, and (c) reflecting the actual descriptive norm for the reference group.
Students will be asked to self-report their alcohol use every 2 weeks in response to two main questions (frequency of 4/5+ drinking in the past 2 weeks, frequency of past 2-week 8/10+ drinking), as well as consequences of their drinking.
The therapeutic role of SM is two-fold.
First, SM facilitates deliberate attention to and reflection on the person's actions, the conditions under which these actions occur, and their consequences (Bandura, 1998; Kanfer, 1970).
Hence, SM of drinking behaviors and consequences has the potential to promote awareness of problematic drinking and need for health services.
Second, SM affords the opportunity to obtain ongoing information concerning the target behavior, which can be used to inform timely intervention decisions (Nahum-Shani et al., 2016)
Web-BASICS is delivered online and responds to individual participant input with the same motivational information and feedback as used in the in-person BASICS intervention.
In-person BASICS content (Dimeff et.
al., 1999) was developed for online use in studies conducted by Drs.
Larimer and Lee (e.g., LaBrie et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2014; Neighbors et al., 2012a).
Web-BASICS feedback contains text and graphical feedback regarding students' reported drinking quantity, frequency, peak alcohol consumption, and blood alcohol content (BAC), risks for alcohol problems based on participant family history and consumption patterns, protective behaviors the participant already uses and others he/she might consider, and a tips page with a BAC chart, information on reduced-risk drinking, and where to get more information.
Participants can print and/or view their individualized content online for up to 3 months.
Other Names:
A health promotion consultation via a campus clinic is a confidential exploration of student drug and alcohol use.
Health Promotion Consultants help students assess how their alcohol and other substance use affects their life and learn how to make healthier decisions.
|
|
Experimental: Later-college Coach
Students from the later-college universal arm, who flag on one of the self-monitoring surveys are invited to correspond with an online health coach who will use motivational interviewing strategies to encourage engagement in a web-based resource or in-person consultation to improve wellbeing, with a particular emphasis on alcohol use.
|
Personalized normative feedback is generated by a process in which: (1) baseline surveys gather respondent information; (2) a computer program links the data with algorithms to select feedback messages; (3) a format for feedback presentation is specified; and (4) the program generates output.
Norms will focus on prevalence of drinking, consuming 4/5+ drinks, total number of drinks consumed each week, and maximum drinks consumed.
Normative information will be from the national Monitoring the Future (MTF) study college student sample and the University of Minnesota Twin Cities campus.
Students will be sent a link to a website where they see their own personal responses in the feedback.
Feedback will detail quantity and frequency of drinking (a) reported by the participant him/herself, (b) according to the participant's perception of the descriptive norm for drinking quantity and frequency for the reference group, and (c) reflecting the actual descriptive norm for the reference group.
Students will be asked to self-report their alcohol use every 2 weeks in response to two main questions (frequency of 4/5+ drinking in the past 2 weeks, frequency of past 2-week 8/10+ drinking), as well as consequences of their drinking.
The therapeutic role of SM is two-fold.
First, SM facilitates deliberate attention to and reflection on the person's actions, the conditions under which these actions occur, and their consequences (Bandura, 1998; Kanfer, 1970).
Hence, SM of drinking behaviors and consequences has the potential to promote awareness of problematic drinking and need for health services.
Second, SM affords the opportunity to obtain ongoing information concerning the target behavior, which can be used to inform timely intervention decisions (Nahum-Shani et al., 2016)
Web-BASICS is delivered online and responds to individual participant input with the same motivational information and feedback as used in the in-person BASICS intervention.
In-person BASICS content (Dimeff et.
al., 1999) was developed for online use in studies conducted by Drs.
Larimer and Lee (e.g., LaBrie et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2014; Neighbors et al., 2012a).
Web-BASICS feedback contains text and graphical feedback regarding students' reported drinking quantity, frequency, peak alcohol consumption, and blood alcohol content (BAC), risks for alcohol problems based on participant family history and consumption patterns, protective behaviors the participant already uses and others he/she might consider, and a tips page with a BAC chart, information on reduced-risk drinking, and where to get more information.
Participants can print and/or view their individualized content online for up to 3 months.
Other Names:
A health promotion consultation via a campus clinic is a confidential exploration of student drug and alcohol use.
Health Promotion Consultants help students assess how their alcohol and other substance use affects their life and learn how to make healthier decisions.
A health coach will correspond with students via a secure online chat platform, utilizing motivational interviewing strategies to encourage students to consider their values and goals, the possibility of behavior change, and available services.
The goal of the dialogue is to motivate the student to access alcohol use interventions (Web-BASICS or an in-person health promotion consultation).
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Binge Drinking
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Respondents are asked about the frequency of consuming 4/5+ drinks within a two-hour period in the past 30 days.
Questions are based on NIAAA recommended alcohol questions (https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/research/guidelines-and-resources/recommended-alcohol-questions) and Monitoring the Future survey items (http://www.monitoringthefuture.org/).
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (B-YAACQ)
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Respondents are asked 24 items derived from the 48-item Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire.
The Brief Young Adult Consequences Questionnaire (B-YAACQ; Read et al., 2006) has items that tap the full range of the alcohol problems continuum from signs of excessive drinking to symptoms consistent with alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence.
|
3 months
|
|
Utilization of Health Services Survey
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Respondents are asked about their utilization of various health services (e.g.
healthcare clinics, therapy, support groups, self-help resources, etc.) in the last 3 months, including when they started, if they are currently utilizing the service/resource, and how helpful it has been.
|
3 months
|
|
Maximum Number of Drinks
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Respondents are asked about the maximum number of drinks consumed within a 24-hour period in the past 30 days.
Question is based on NIAAA recommended alcohol questions (https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/research/guidelines-and-resources/recommended-alcohol-questions).
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Nahum-Shani I, Smith SN, Spring BJ, Collins LM, Witkiewitz K, Tewari A, Murphy SA. Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) in Mobile Health: Key Components and Design Principles for Ongoing Health Behavior Support. Ann Behav Med. 2018 May 18;52(6):446-462. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8.
- Labrie JW, Lewis MA, Atkins DC, Neighbors C, Zheng C, Kenney SR, Napper LE, Walter T, Kilmer JR, Hummer JF, Grossbard J, Ghaidarov TM, Desai S, Lee CM, Larimer ME. RCT of web-based personalized normative feedback for college drinking prevention: are typical student norms good enough? J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Dec;81(6):1074-86. doi: 10.1037/a0034087. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
- Lee CM, Neighbors C, Lewis MA, Kaysen D, Mittmann A, Geisner IM, Atkins DC, Zheng C, Garberson LA, Kilmer JR, Larimer ME. Randomized controlled trial of a Spring Break intervention to reduce high-risk drinking. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Apr;82(2):189-201. doi: 10.1037/a0035743. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
- Patrick ME, Boatman JA, Morrell N, Wagner AC, Lyden GR, Nahum-Shani I, King CA, Bonar EE, Lee CM, Larimer ME, Vock DM, Almirall D. A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) protocol for empirically developing an adaptive preventive intervention for college student drinking reduction. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Sep;96:106089. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106089. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
- Bonar EE, Parks MJ, Gunlicks-Stoessel M, Lyden GR, Mehus CJ, Morrell N, Patrick ME. Binge drinking before and after a COVID-19 campus closure among first-year college students. Addict Behav. 2021 Jul;118:106879. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106879. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
- Mehus CJ, Lyden GR, Bonar EE, Gunlicks-Stoessel M, Morrell N, Parks MJ, Wagner AC, Patrick ME. Association between COVID-19-related loneliness or worry and symptoms of anxiety and depression among first-year college students. J Am Coll Health. 2021 Jul 9:1-6. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1942009. Online ahead of print.
- Lyden GR, Vock DM, Sur A, Morrell N, Lee CM, Patrick ME. Deeply Tailored Adaptive Interventions to Reduce College Student Drinking: a Real-World Application of Q-Learning for SMART Studies. Prev Sci. 2022 Aug;23(6):1053-1064. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01371-7. Epub 2022 May 11.
- Carpenter SM, Yap J, Patrick ME, Morrell N, Dziak JJ, Almirall D, Yoon C, Nahum-Shani I. Self-relevant appeals to engage in self-monitoring of alcohol use: A microrandomized trial. Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Jul 14:10.1037/adb0000855. doi: 10.1037/adb0000855. Online ahead of print.
- Patrick ME, Lyden GR, Morrell N, Mehus CJ, Gunlicks-Stoessel M, Lee CM, King CA, Bonar EE, Nahum-Shani I, Almirall D, Larimer ME, Vock DM. Main outcomes of M-bridge: A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) for developing an adaptive preventive intervention for college drinking. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Jul;89(7):601-614. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000663.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00006421
- R01AA026574 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.