- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03930524
Adaptive Preventive Intervention for College Alcohol Use
March 21, 2023 updated by: University of Minnesota
An Adaptive Preventive Intervention to Optimize the Transition From Universal to Indicated Resources for College Student Alcohol Use
This research project is designed to promote health among first-year college students by implementing an adaptive sequence of preventive intervention strategies to motivate heavy-drinking college students to access existing resources in order to reduce high-risk alcohol use and negative consequences.
If found efficacious, the adaptive preventive intervention (API) has the potential to reduce both the acute negative health consequences (e.g., injury, alcohol poisoning) and long-term health consequences (e.g., alcohol use disorders) of young adult alcohol use, while seeking to leverage technology in order to use campus resources in the most efficient way possible.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
College student alcohol use and associated negative consequences are public health problems.
In particular, first-year students transitioning to college are at increased risk.
Scarce intervention resources must be used as wisely as possible to address these concerns.
One way to address heavy drinking while conserving resources is to first utilize universal interventions, identify students at high risk who do not respond well, and then motivate them to engage in indicated intervention.
This approach to prevention is 'adaptive' because information about the student in the course of the intervention (e.g., response status) is used to determine whether more resources should be invested to motivate the student to transition to indicated services.
The purpose of this project is to implement adaptive preventive intervention (API) that employs cost-effective, technology-based brief interventions to do the following.
First, provide a universal personalized normative feedback (PNF) intervention followed by student self-monitoring (SM).
Second, motivate students who continue to drink heavily (i.e., 2+ reports of 4/5+ drinks for women/men, or 1 report of 8/10+ drinks for women/men) to transition to additional intervention resources.
To optimize the efficacy of this intervention, we will investigate the best timing for delivering the initial universal PNF+SM intervention (i.e., as an inoculation before moving to college vs. once they are experiencing the college context during their first semester).
Additionally, we will examine how best to motivate heavy-drinking students to pursue indicated intervention (i.e., via automated emails vs. online interaction with a personal health coach using M-bridge).
A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) design will be used to address these questions.
College students will be randomized to receive PNF either before college begins (2 weeks before classes start) or during the beginning of the first semester (about 3 weeks after they arrive on campus), followed by SM every two weeks during the first semester; these SM assessments will be used to identify heavy-drinking students who remain at risk.
Once heavy drinking is identified, the student will be re-randomized to either an automated email or M-bridge health coach to offer indicated intervention resources.
The specific aims are to examine: (1) the efficacy of the API compared to an assessment-only control, (2) whether the API can be optimized by altering the timing of the universal intervention and/or the type of message to motivate seeking indicated intervention, and (3) moderators of these effects (e.g., pre-college drinking intentions, high-intensity [compared to binge] drinking during the start of college).
Frequency of heavy drinking, alcohol-related consequences, and health services utilization will be assessed prior to the start of classes, and at each follow-up point (the end of the semester, the end of the year, and the following fall).
The API to be refined through this project will offer a novel strategy for mitigating both the acute negative health consequences (e.g., injury, alcohol poisoning) and long-term health consequences (e.g., alcohol use disorders) of young adult alcohol use.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
891
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55415
- University of Minnesota
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 21 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Incoming college students aged 18-21 at the University of Minnesota will be eligible and randomly selected for participation.
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Assessment Only
Control
|
|
Experimental: Early-college Universal
Prior to beginning their first semester of college, incoming students will receive personalized normative feedback (PNF) comparing their experiences to other college students their age, as well as up to 4 self-monitoring surveys over the course of the semester.
|
Personalized normative feedback is generated by a process in which: (1) baseline surveys gather respondent information; (2) a computer program links the data with algorithms to select feedback messages; (3) a format for feedback presentation is specified; and (4) the program generates output.
Norms will focus on prevalence of drinking, consuming 4/5+ drinks, total number of drinks consumed each week, and maximum drinks consumed.
Normative information will be from the national Monitoring the Future (MTF) study college student sample and the University of Minnesota Twin Cities campus.
Students will be sent a link to a website where they see their own personal responses in the feedback.
Feedback will detail quantity and frequency of drinking (a) reported by the participant him/herself, (b) according to the participant's perception of the descriptive norm for drinking quantity and frequency for the reference group, and (c) reflecting the actual descriptive norm for the reference group.
Students will be asked to self-report their alcohol use every 2 weeks in response to two main questions (frequency of 4/5+ drinking in the past 2 weeks, frequency of past 2-week 8/10+ drinking), as well as consequences of their drinking.
The therapeutic role of SM is two-fold.
First, SM facilitates deliberate attention to and reflection on the person's actions, the conditions under which these actions occur, and their consequences (Bandura, 1998; Kanfer, 1970).
Hence, SM of drinking behaviors and consequences has the potential to promote awareness of problematic drinking and need for health services.
Second, SM affords the opportunity to obtain ongoing information concerning the target behavior, which can be used to inform timely intervention decisions (Nahum-Shani et al., 2016)
|
Experimental: Early-college No Coach (automated email)
Students from the early-college universal arm, who flag on one of the self-monitoring surveys are invited to engage in a web-based resource or in-person consultation to improve well-being, with a particular emphasis on alcohol use.
|
Personalized normative feedback is generated by a process in which: (1) baseline surveys gather respondent information; (2) a computer program links the data with algorithms to select feedback messages; (3) a format for feedback presentation is specified; and (4) the program generates output.
Norms will focus on prevalence of drinking, consuming 4/5+ drinks, total number of drinks consumed each week, and maximum drinks consumed.
Normative information will be from the national Monitoring the Future (MTF) study college student sample and the University of Minnesota Twin Cities campus.
Students will be sent a link to a website where they see their own personal responses in the feedback.
Feedback will detail quantity and frequency of drinking (a) reported by the participant him/herself, (b) according to the participant's perception of the descriptive norm for drinking quantity and frequency for the reference group, and (c) reflecting the actual descriptive norm for the reference group.
Students will be asked to self-report their alcohol use every 2 weeks in response to two main questions (frequency of 4/5+ drinking in the past 2 weeks, frequency of past 2-week 8/10+ drinking), as well as consequences of their drinking.
The therapeutic role of SM is two-fold.
First, SM facilitates deliberate attention to and reflection on the person's actions, the conditions under which these actions occur, and their consequences (Bandura, 1998; Kanfer, 1970).
Hence, SM of drinking behaviors and consequences has the potential to promote awareness of problematic drinking and need for health services.
Second, SM affords the opportunity to obtain ongoing information concerning the target behavior, which can be used to inform timely intervention decisions (Nahum-Shani et al., 2016)
Web-BASICS is delivered online and responds to individual participant input with the same motivational information and feedback as used in the in-person BASICS intervention.
In-person BASICS content (Dimeff et.
al., 1999) was developed for online use in studies conducted by Drs.
Larimer and Lee (e.g., LaBrie et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2014; Neighbors et al., 2012a).
Web-BASICS feedback contains text and graphical feedback regarding students' reported drinking quantity, frequency, peak alcohol consumption, and blood alcohol content (BAC), risks for alcohol problems based on participant family history and consumption patterns, protective behaviors the participant already uses and others he/she might consider, and a tips page with a BAC chart, information on reduced-risk drinking, and where to get more information.
Participants can print and/or view their individualized content online for up to 3 months.
Other Names:
A health promotion consultation via a campus clinic is a confidential exploration of student drug and alcohol use.
Health Promotion Consultants help students assess how their alcohol and other substance use affects their life and learn how to make healthier decisions.
|
Experimental: Early-college Coach
Students from the early-college universal arm, who flag on one of the self-monitoring surveys are invited to correspond with an online health coach who will use motivational interviewing strategies to encourage engagement in a web-based resource or in-person consultation to improve wellbeing, with a particular emphasis on alcohol use.
|
Personalized normative feedback is generated by a process in which: (1) baseline surveys gather respondent information; (2) a computer program links the data with algorithms to select feedback messages; (3) a format for feedback presentation is specified; and (4) the program generates output.
Norms will focus on prevalence of drinking, consuming 4/5+ drinks, total number of drinks consumed each week, and maximum drinks consumed.
Normative information will be from the national Monitoring the Future (MTF) study college student sample and the University of Minnesota Twin Cities campus.
Students will be sent a link to a website where they see their own personal responses in the feedback.
Feedback will detail quantity and frequency of drinking (a) reported by the participant him/herself, (b) according to the participant's perception of the descriptive norm for drinking quantity and frequency for the reference group, and (c) reflecting the actual descriptive norm for the reference group.
Students will be asked to self-report their alcohol use every 2 weeks in response to two main questions (frequency of 4/5+ drinking in the past 2 weeks, frequency of past 2-week 8/10+ drinking), as well as consequences of their drinking.
The therapeutic role of SM is two-fold.
First, SM facilitates deliberate attention to and reflection on the person's actions, the conditions under which these actions occur, and their consequences (Bandura, 1998; Kanfer, 1970).
Hence, SM of drinking behaviors and consequences has the potential to promote awareness of problematic drinking and need for health services.
Second, SM affords the opportunity to obtain ongoing information concerning the target behavior, which can be used to inform timely intervention decisions (Nahum-Shani et al., 2016)
Web-BASICS is delivered online and responds to individual participant input with the same motivational information and feedback as used in the in-person BASICS intervention.
In-person BASICS content (Dimeff et.
al., 1999) was developed for online use in studies conducted by Drs.
Larimer and Lee (e.g., LaBrie et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2014; Neighbors et al., 2012a).
Web-BASICS feedback contains text and graphical feedback regarding students' reported drinking quantity, frequency, peak alcohol consumption, and blood alcohol content (BAC), risks for alcohol problems based on participant family history and consumption patterns, protective behaviors the participant already uses and others he/she might consider, and a tips page with a BAC chart, information on reduced-risk drinking, and where to get more information.
Participants can print and/or view their individualized content online for up to 3 months.
Other Names:
A health promotion consultation via a campus clinic is a confidential exploration of student drug and alcohol use.
Health Promotion Consultants help students assess how their alcohol and other substance use affects their life and learn how to make healthier decisions.
A health coach will correspond with students via a secure online chat platform, utilizing motivational interviewing strategies to encourage students to consider their values and goals, the possibility of behavior change, and available services.
The goal of the dialogue is to motivate the student to access alcohol use interventions (Web-BASICS or an in-person health promotion consultation).
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Later-college Universal
After beginning their first semester of college, students will receive personalized normative feedback (PNF) comparing their experiences to other college students their age, as well as up to 4 self-monitoring surveys over the course of the semester.
|
Personalized normative feedback is generated by a process in which: (1) baseline surveys gather respondent information; (2) a computer program links the data with algorithms to select feedback messages; (3) a format for feedback presentation is specified; and (4) the program generates output.
Norms will focus on prevalence of drinking, consuming 4/5+ drinks, total number of drinks consumed each week, and maximum drinks consumed.
Normative information will be from the national Monitoring the Future (MTF) study college student sample and the University of Minnesota Twin Cities campus.
Students will be sent a link to a website where they see their own personal responses in the feedback.
Feedback will detail quantity and frequency of drinking (a) reported by the participant him/herself, (b) according to the participant's perception of the descriptive norm for drinking quantity and frequency for the reference group, and (c) reflecting the actual descriptive norm for the reference group.
Students will be asked to self-report their alcohol use every 2 weeks in response to two main questions (frequency of 4/5+ drinking in the past 2 weeks, frequency of past 2-week 8/10+ drinking), as well as consequences of their drinking.
The therapeutic role of SM is two-fold.
First, SM facilitates deliberate attention to and reflection on the person's actions, the conditions under which these actions occur, and their consequences (Bandura, 1998; Kanfer, 1970).
Hence, SM of drinking behaviors and consequences has the potential to promote awareness of problematic drinking and need for health services.
Second, SM affords the opportunity to obtain ongoing information concerning the target behavior, which can be used to inform timely intervention decisions (Nahum-Shani et al., 2016)
|
Experimental: Later-college No Coach (automated email)
Students from the later-college universal arm, who flag on one of the self-monitoring surveys are invited to engage in a web-based resource or in-person consultation to improve wellbeing, with a particular emphasis on alcohol use.
|
Personalized normative feedback is generated by a process in which: (1) baseline surveys gather respondent information; (2) a computer program links the data with algorithms to select feedback messages; (3) a format for feedback presentation is specified; and (4) the program generates output.
Norms will focus on prevalence of drinking, consuming 4/5+ drinks, total number of drinks consumed each week, and maximum drinks consumed.
Normative information will be from the national Monitoring the Future (MTF) study college student sample and the University of Minnesota Twin Cities campus.
Students will be sent a link to a website where they see their own personal responses in the feedback.
Feedback will detail quantity and frequency of drinking (a) reported by the participant him/herself, (b) according to the participant's perception of the descriptive norm for drinking quantity and frequency for the reference group, and (c) reflecting the actual descriptive norm for the reference group.
Students will be asked to self-report their alcohol use every 2 weeks in response to two main questions (frequency of 4/5+ drinking in the past 2 weeks, frequency of past 2-week 8/10+ drinking), as well as consequences of their drinking.
The therapeutic role of SM is two-fold.
First, SM facilitates deliberate attention to and reflection on the person's actions, the conditions under which these actions occur, and their consequences (Bandura, 1998; Kanfer, 1970).
Hence, SM of drinking behaviors and consequences has the potential to promote awareness of problematic drinking and need for health services.
Second, SM affords the opportunity to obtain ongoing information concerning the target behavior, which can be used to inform timely intervention decisions (Nahum-Shani et al., 2016)
Web-BASICS is delivered online and responds to individual participant input with the same motivational information and feedback as used in the in-person BASICS intervention.
In-person BASICS content (Dimeff et.
al., 1999) was developed for online use in studies conducted by Drs.
Larimer and Lee (e.g., LaBrie et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2014; Neighbors et al., 2012a).
Web-BASICS feedback contains text and graphical feedback regarding students' reported drinking quantity, frequency, peak alcohol consumption, and blood alcohol content (BAC), risks for alcohol problems based on participant family history and consumption patterns, protective behaviors the participant already uses and others he/she might consider, and a tips page with a BAC chart, information on reduced-risk drinking, and where to get more information.
Participants can print and/or view their individualized content online for up to 3 months.
Other Names:
A health promotion consultation via a campus clinic is a confidential exploration of student drug and alcohol use.
Health Promotion Consultants help students assess how their alcohol and other substance use affects their life and learn how to make healthier decisions.
|
Experimental: Later-college Coach
Students from the later-college universal arm, who flag on one of the self-monitoring surveys are invited to correspond with an online health coach who will use motivational interviewing strategies to encourage engagement in a web-based resource or in-person consultation to improve wellbeing, with a particular emphasis on alcohol use.
|
Personalized normative feedback is generated by a process in which: (1) baseline surveys gather respondent information; (2) a computer program links the data with algorithms to select feedback messages; (3) a format for feedback presentation is specified; and (4) the program generates output.
Norms will focus on prevalence of drinking, consuming 4/5+ drinks, total number of drinks consumed each week, and maximum drinks consumed.
Normative information will be from the national Monitoring the Future (MTF) study college student sample and the University of Minnesota Twin Cities campus.
Students will be sent a link to a website where they see their own personal responses in the feedback.
Feedback will detail quantity and frequency of drinking (a) reported by the participant him/herself, (b) according to the participant's perception of the descriptive norm for drinking quantity and frequency for the reference group, and (c) reflecting the actual descriptive norm for the reference group.
Students will be asked to self-report their alcohol use every 2 weeks in response to two main questions (frequency of 4/5+ drinking in the past 2 weeks, frequency of past 2-week 8/10+ drinking), as well as consequences of their drinking.
The therapeutic role of SM is two-fold.
First, SM facilitates deliberate attention to and reflection on the person's actions, the conditions under which these actions occur, and their consequences (Bandura, 1998; Kanfer, 1970).
Hence, SM of drinking behaviors and consequences has the potential to promote awareness of problematic drinking and need for health services.
Second, SM affords the opportunity to obtain ongoing information concerning the target behavior, which can be used to inform timely intervention decisions (Nahum-Shani et al., 2016)
Web-BASICS is delivered online and responds to individual participant input with the same motivational information and feedback as used in the in-person BASICS intervention.
In-person BASICS content (Dimeff et.
al., 1999) was developed for online use in studies conducted by Drs.
Larimer and Lee (e.g., LaBrie et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2014; Neighbors et al., 2012a).
Web-BASICS feedback contains text and graphical feedback regarding students' reported drinking quantity, frequency, peak alcohol consumption, and blood alcohol content (BAC), risks for alcohol problems based on participant family history and consumption patterns, protective behaviors the participant already uses and others he/she might consider, and a tips page with a BAC chart, information on reduced-risk drinking, and where to get more information.
Participants can print and/or view their individualized content online for up to 3 months.
Other Names:
A health promotion consultation via a campus clinic is a confidential exploration of student drug and alcohol use.
Health Promotion Consultants help students assess how their alcohol and other substance use affects their life and learn how to make healthier decisions.
A health coach will correspond with students via a secure online chat platform, utilizing motivational interviewing strategies to encourage students to consider their values and goals, the possibility of behavior change, and available services.
The goal of the dialogue is to motivate the student to access alcohol use interventions (Web-BASICS or an in-person health promotion consultation).
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Binge Drinking
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Respondents are asked about the frequency of consuming 4/5+ drinks within a two-hour period in the past 30 days.
Questions are based on NIAAA recommended alcohol questions (https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/research/guidelines-and-resources/recommended-alcohol-questions) and Monitoring the Future survey items (http://www.monitoringthefuture.org/).
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (B-YAACQ)
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Respondents are asked 24 items derived from the 48-item Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire.
The Brief Young Adult Consequences Questionnaire (B-YAACQ; Read et al., 2006) has items that tap the full range of the alcohol problems continuum from signs of excessive drinking to symptoms consistent with alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence.
|
3 months
|
Utilization of Health Services Survey
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Respondents are asked about their utilization of various health services (e.g.
healthcare clinics, therapy, support groups, self-help resources, etc.) in the last 3 months, including when they started, if they are currently utilizing the service/resource, and how helpful it has been.
|
3 months
|
Maximum Number of Drinks
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Respondents are asked about the maximum number of drinks consumed within a 24-hour period in the past 30 days.
Question is based on NIAAA recommended alcohol questions (https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/research/guidelines-and-resources/recommended-alcohol-questions).
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Nahum-Shani I, Smith SN, Spring BJ, Collins LM, Witkiewitz K, Tewari A, Murphy SA. Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) in Mobile Health: Key Components and Design Principles for Ongoing Health Behavior Support. Ann Behav Med. 2018 May 18;52(6):446-462. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8.
- Labrie JW, Lewis MA, Atkins DC, Neighbors C, Zheng C, Kenney SR, Napper LE, Walter T, Kilmer JR, Hummer JF, Grossbard J, Ghaidarov TM, Desai S, Lee CM, Larimer ME. RCT of web-based personalized normative feedback for college drinking prevention: are typical student norms good enough? J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Dec;81(6):1074-86. doi: 10.1037/a0034087. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
- Lee CM, Neighbors C, Lewis MA, Kaysen D, Mittmann A, Geisner IM, Atkins DC, Zheng C, Garberson LA, Kilmer JR, Larimer ME. Randomized controlled trial of a Spring Break intervention to reduce high-risk drinking. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Apr;82(2):189-201. doi: 10.1037/a0035743. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
- Patrick ME, Boatman JA, Morrell N, Wagner AC, Lyden GR, Nahum-Shani I, King CA, Bonar EE, Lee CM, Larimer ME, Vock DM, Almirall D. A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) protocol for empirically developing an adaptive preventive intervention for college student drinking reduction. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Sep;96:106089. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106089. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
- Bonar EE, Parks MJ, Gunlicks-Stoessel M, Lyden GR, Mehus CJ, Morrell N, Patrick ME. Binge drinking before and after a COVID-19 campus closure among first-year college students. Addict Behav. 2021 Jul;118:106879. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106879. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
- Mehus CJ, Lyden GR, Bonar EE, Gunlicks-Stoessel M, Morrell N, Parks MJ, Wagner AC, Patrick ME. Association between COVID-19-related loneliness or worry and symptoms of anxiety and depression among first-year college students. J Am Coll Health. 2021 Jul 9:1-6. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1942009. Online ahead of print.
- Lyden GR, Vock DM, Sur A, Morrell N, Lee CM, Patrick ME. Deeply Tailored Adaptive Interventions to Reduce College Student Drinking: a Real-World Application of Q-Learning for SMART Studies. Prev Sci. 2022 Aug;23(6):1053-1064. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01371-7. Epub 2022 May 11.
- Carpenter SM, Yap J, Patrick ME, Morrell N, Dziak JJ, Almirall D, Yoon C, Nahum-Shani I. Self-relevant appeals to engage in self-monitoring of alcohol use: A microrandomized trial. Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Jul 14:10.1037/adb0000855. doi: 10.1037/adb0000855. Online ahead of print.
- Patrick ME, Lyden GR, Morrell N, Mehus CJ, Gunlicks-Stoessel M, Lee CM, King CA, Bonar EE, Nahum-Shani I, Almirall D, Larimer ME, Vock DM. Main outcomes of M-bridge: A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) for developing an adaptive preventive intervention for college drinking. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Jul;89(7):601-614. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000663.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 31, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 18, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 24, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
April 29, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 12, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 21, 2023
Last Verified
March 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00006421
- R01AA026574 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on College Student Drinking
-
Abby BraitmanNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)Completed
-
Abby BraitmanNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)CompletedCollege Student DrinkingUnited States
-
Abby BraitmanNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)Completed
-
Abby BraitmanNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)CompletedCollege Student Drinking
-
James M. HensonNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)RecruitingCollege Student DrinkingUnited States
-
Abby BraitmanNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)Enrolling by invitationCollege Student DrinkingUnited States
-
Penn State UniversityNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA); National Institutes...Active, not recruitingUnderage Drinking | Driving Under the Influence | Drinking, Teen | Drinking, CollegeUnited States
-
Penn State UniversityRecruitingCannabis Use | College Drinking | Underage Drinking | Drinking, Teen | Drinking, College | Teen DrinkingUnited States
-
Universidad de los Andes, ChileMinisterio de Educación, ChileCompletedDepression | Stress | Anxiety | Mental Health | Depression, Anxiety | College Drinking | StudentChile
-
Contextual Change LLCCompletedCollege Student Mental HealthUnited States
Clinical Trials on Personalized Normative Feedback (PNF)
-
RANDNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)CompletedAOD Misuse | AOD Associated ConsequencesUnited States
-
University of HoustonCompletedHeavy DrinkingUnited States
-
Brown UniversityNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA); University of HoustonRecruitingAlcohol Drinking | Alcohol AbuseUnited States
-
University of HoustonNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)Completed
-
Duquesne UniversityNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)RecruitingAlcohol ConsumptionUnited States
-
Federal University of São PauloCompleted
-
RANDUniversity of Southern CaliforniaNot yet recruitingHeavy Drinking | Mental Health Wellness
-
Loyola Marymount UniversityNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)CompletedAlcohol Drinking | Alcohol; Harmful Use | Alcohol AbuseUnited States
-
University of Southern DenmarkNational Board of Health, DenmarkCompleted
-
Loyola Marymount UniversityUniversity of HoustonRecruitingAlcohol Use Disorder | College Drinking | Underage DrinkingUnited States