Biomarkers In Hidradenitis Suppurativa Participants Receiving Brodalumab

June 3, 2020 updated by: Rockefeller University

A Pilot Study of Safety and Biomarkers In Hidradenitis Suppurativa Participants Receiving Brodalumab

Phase 0 Study of Brodalumab in patients with moderate to severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa to identify biomarkers of disease activity and clinical response.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Phase 0, Open Label study of Brodalumab in patients with moderate to severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa. Consisting of n=10 patients receiving 210mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. Patients will be followed for a period of 36 weeks (12 weeks after last dose of Brodalumab) to assess for safety.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Rockefeller Unviersity

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed Diagnosis of Hidradenitis Suppurativa by the PI
  • Age 18 or older
  • Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa as determined by the PI

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • HIV Positive
  • Active Hepatitis B or C Infection
  • Pregnant or Breastfeeding
  • no concurrent use of any systemic antibiotics/retinoids/imunosuppressants (require washout period of >5 half lives)
  • Any medical, psychological or social condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would jeopardize the health or well being go the participant during any study procedures or the integrity of the data
  • High Suicide Risk as determined by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale
  • History of Keloid Scarring

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention
Brodalumab 210mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks
Drug: Brodalumab
interleukin 17 receptor A antagonist
Other Names:
  • Siliq

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Time Frame: Week 0 to Week 24
Incidence of Grade 2/3 adverse events during the study
Week 0 to Week 24
Biomarkers at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12 compared with baseline.
Primary Outcomes would be the change in lesional tissue levels of IL-17A, IL-17C, IL-17F and IL-23 measured in pg/mL measured in pg/mL
Week 12 compared with baseline.
Biomarkers at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24 compared with baseline.
Primary Outcomes would be the change in lesional tissue levels of IL-17A, IL-17C, IL-17F and IL-23 measured in pg/mL measured in pg/mL
Week 24 compared with baseline.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Response at Week 12 (as measured by HiSCR)
Time Frame: Week 12 compared with Baseline
Clinical Response compared to baseline as assessed by the HiSCR (Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response) Defined as a greater than or equal to 50% reduction in inflammatory lesion count (abscesses plus inflammatory nodules), and no increase in abscesses or draining fistulas at Week 12 when compared with baseline
Week 12 compared with Baseline
Clinical Response at Week 12 (as measured by modified Sartorius Score)
Time Frame: Week 12 compared with Baseline
Clinical Response compared to baseline as assessed by the modified Sartorius Score as follows: Sum of separate scoring for each affected area using the data recorded as follows: a) 3 points per anatomical region involved; b) 6 points for each fistula and 1 point for each nodule or abscess; c) 1 point when the longest distance between two relevant lesions in each affected area is <5 cm; 3 points when it is 5-10 cm; and 9 points when it is >10 cm; d) 9 points when there is no clear separation of lesions from adjacent normal skin and 0 points when there is.
Week 12 compared with Baseline
Clinical Response at Week 12 (as measured by IHS4)
Time Frame: Week 12 compared with Baseline
Clinical Response compared to baseline as assessed by IHS4 (International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score) using the scoring system as follows: Total= (Number of nodules x1) + (Number of abscesses x2) + (Number of draining sinuses/fistulae x4)
Week 12 compared with Baseline
Clinical Response at Week 24 (as measured by HiSCR)
Time Frame: Week 24 compared with Baseline
Clinical Response compared to baseline as assessed by the HiSCR (Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response) Defined as a greater than or equal to 50% reduction in inflammatory lesion count (abscesses plus inflammatory nodules), and no increase in abscesses or draining fistulas at Week 24 when compared with baseline
Week 24 compared with Baseline
Clinical Response at Week 24 (as measured by modified Sartorius Score)
Time Frame: Week 24 compared with Baseline
Clinical Response compared to baseline as assessed by the modified Sartorius Score as follows: Sum of separate scoring for each affected area using the data recorded as follows: a) 3 points per anatomical region involved; b) 6 points for each fistula and 1 point for each nodule or abscess; c) 1 point when the longest distance between two relevant lesions in each affected area is <5 cm; 3 points when it is 5-10 cm; and 9 points when it is >10 cm; d) 9 points when there is no clear separation of lesions from adjacent normal skin and 0 points when there is.
Week 24 compared with Baseline
Clinical Response at Week 24 (as measured by IHS4)
Time Frame: Week 24 compared with Baseline
Clinical Response compared to baseline as assessed by IHS4 (International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score) using the scoring system as follows: Total= (Number of nodules x1) + (Number of abscesses x2) + (Number of draining sinuses/fistulae x4)
Week 24 compared with Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Rockefeller University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Valeant Pharmaceuticals

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 28, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 21, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 3, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • JFR-0989

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings