Ideal Initial Bolus and Infusion Rate for Erector Spinae Plane Block Catheters

January 22, 2020 updated by: Virginia Commonwealth University
This study would like to identify the best starting dose and infusion rate for nerve blocks and nerve catheters related to the erector spinae plane block that can improve functional status and pain control on cardiac surgery patients and minimize the necessity for opioid pain control using a continuous reassessment model.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study will continue taking steps in helping to identify the role erector spinae plane nerve blocks have in thoracic surgery. This is a relatively new nerve block (first identified and described in 2016) and the studies that have been done and the case series that have been reported have been very promising in supporting its role in thoracic surgery. As it is a plane block (not around a specific nerve but in a general area), larger volumes and doses often have to be used in these sorts of blocks (such as a transverses abdominalis plane block) to get good spread of the local anesthetic in the plane to reach the desired nerves that pass through this plane with one injection. Our hospital has been doing these blocks for patients as a standard of care for them, but this study will take a closer look to see if there is an optimal dose and volume of medicine to improve patients' functional status and pain control to minimize the need for opioids. The study will use a continuous reassessment model to determine the optimal dose.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
        • Virginia Commonwealth University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients undergoing planned thoracotomies and sternotomies for cardiothoracic surgery who will be taken to the cardiac surgery ICU postoperatively

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMI >40
  • infection at the proposed catheter site
  • ongoing sepsis/bacteremia
  • patient unable to sit up for the procedure
  • patients requiring significant vasopressor support (>1 vasopressor)
  • patient refusal
  • less than 18 years of age (they are managed in the pediatric ICU rather than the Cardiac Surgery ICU)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Bilateral catheters
patients receiving bilateral catheters (such as for patients undergoing sternotomies/midline incisions or with planned bilateral thoracotomy incisions)
Drug: Ropivacaine 0.2%-Sodium Chloride 0.9% Injectable Solution bilaterally
Variable initial post-operative dose of 10cc to 40cc bilaterally with a variable programmed dose to be repeated afterward of 10cc to 40cc of 0.2% ropivacaine every 6 hours bilaterally.
Experimental: Single catheter
patients who only have one catheter in place (such as in patients who have unilateral thoracotomies and not midline sternotomies)
Drug: Ropivacaine 0.2%-Sodium Chloride 0.9% Injectable Solution unilaterally
Variable initial post-operative dose of 10cc to 40cc unilaterally with a variable programmed dose to be repeated afterward of 10cc to 40cc of 0.2% ropivacaine every 6 hours unilaterally.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Median Effective Dose
Time Frame: 6.5 hours
Dose at which 50% of patients achieve a clinically significant nerve block after a single bolus and after periodic programmed boluses of Ropivacaine as represented by either an adequate decrease in sensation of the chest (covering at least 5 dermatomes) or an improvement in vital capacity breaths (of 500 mL or more)
6.5 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain rating
Time Frame: From just before to 30 minutes after a bolus is administered
Self reported pain rating on a 0-10 scale where 0 is no pain and 10 is pain as bad as it can be
From just before to 30 minutes after a bolus is administered
Change in heart rate
Time Frame: From just before to 30 minutes after a bolus is administered
Heart rate measured using a heart rate monitor
From just before to 30 minutes after a bolus is administered
Blood pressure
Time Frame: From just before to 30 minutes after a bolus is administered
Blood pressure measured using a blood pressure monitor
From just before to 30 minutes after a bolus is administered
Change in percent oxygen saturation of hemoglobin
Time Frame: From just before to 30 minutes after a bolus is administered
Pulse oximetry reading from a monitor
From just before to 30 minutes after a bolus is administered
Changes in electrocardiogram tracing
Time Frame: From just before a bolus is administered to 6.5 hours
Monitoring for changes in electrical conduction in the heart as monitored by the continuous 5 lead electrocardiogram tracing, watching for any side effects.
From just before a bolus is administered to 6.5 hours
Dermatomal coverage
Time Frame: From just before to 30 minutes after a bolus is administered
The area of numbness experienced in the chest wall as measured using a pinprick test and documented on a cartoon map showing a chest wall and dermatomal borders
From just before to 30 minutes after a bolus is administered
Opioid consumption
Time Frame: 6.5 hours
Total opioid medication consumption during the study period
6.5 hours
Non-narcotic pain medication consumption
Time Frame: 6.5 hours
Total non-narcotic pain medicine consumption during the study period
6.5 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Virginia Commonwealth University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Bryant Tran, MD, Virginia Commonwealth University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 23, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 21, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 22, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HM20014242

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings