Vitamin D Can Increase Pathological Response of the Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy

February 21, 2024 updated by: Cetin Ordu, Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul

The Effect of Vitamin D Replacement Therapy on Pathological Response in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy

The aim of the study is to evaluate the relationship between the vitamin D replacement and pathological response in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy according to different molecular sub types. Because of no study evaluating pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy with vitamin D replacement in patients with breast cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Calcitriol, a vitamin D metabolite, inhibits cell proliferation and pathways in invitro experiments. Vitamin D affects gene expression related to breast cancer and prevents cell differentiation, growth and angiogenesis . Low vitamin D may include a high risk of breast cancer, but there are also studies reporting that patients with low vitamin D levels at the time of diagnosis show more aggressive breast cancer course . Breast cells can produce vitamin D by taking part in the formation of 1,25 OH vit D3 in vitamin D synthesis as well as in kidney cells. Apoptosis can be caused by vitamin D receptors . There are very few studies on the effect of vitamin D replacement on breast cancer-related survival. There are studies reporting the incidence of fewer breast cancer with vitamin D replacement in contrast to there are studies showing the opposite .Patients achieved pathological complete response (PCR) with neoadjuvant therapy have been shown to have better survival. There are studies showing that they do not affect the PCR ratio related to the level of vitamin D in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In one study, it was shown that it increases the response rate when given with bisphosphonate .There is no study evaluating pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy with vitamin D replacement in patients with breast cancer. The aim of the study is to evaluate the relationship between the vitamin D replacement and pathological response in patients undergoing neo-adjuvant therapy according to different molecular subtypes of biopsy-diagnosed breast cancer patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
64

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Turkey
    • Şişli
      • Istanbul, Şişli, Turkey, 34450
        • İstanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital Breast Health Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Invasive breast cancer is confirmed by biopsy
  • enough organ function,
  • metabolically normal,
  • eligible for neoadjuvant treatment
  • The patients who were informed about the prerequisites with their consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having metastatic disease
  • having not operated from breast cancer after neoadjuvant treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: study group
The patients measured a total of 25 OH vitamin D3 levels, initial, 3'th month and 6'th month of neoadjuvant therapy with replacement treatment with vitamin D3 at least weekly 50000 IU for eight weeks.
Drug: Vit D
The aim of this study is investigating pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy if we give replacement therapy with vitamin D3 50.000 IU weekly dosage concurrent with chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.
Other Names:
  • Vitamin D3
  • cholecalciferol
Other: control group
The patients had measured a total of 25 OH vitamin D3 levels, previously treated with neoadjuvant therapy without replacement treatment with vitamin D3.
Drug: Vit D
The aim of this study is investigating pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy if we give replacement therapy with vitamin D3 50.000 IU weekly dosage concurrent with chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.
Other Names:
  • Vitamin D3
  • cholecalciferol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pathological complete response (PCR)
Time Frame: an average 24 weeks
No residual tumor cells both in axilla and breast
an average 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pathological complete response (PCR) relations with vitamin D levels
Time Frame: an average 24 weeks
evaluating PCR in both axilla and breast in terms of levels of total 25 (OH) vitamin D at initial and after replacement vitamin D
an average 24 weeks
pathological complete response (PCR) ratio regarding molecular sub types
Time Frame: an average 24 weeks
evaluating PCR in both axilla and breast in terms of levels of total 25 (OH) vitamin D at initial and after replacement vitamin D according moleculary subtypes
an average 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Çetin Ordu, Assoc. Prof, Gayrettepe FN Hospital
  • Study Director: Fatma Aktepe, Prof, Gayrettepe FN Hospital
  • Study Chair: Vahit Özmen, Prof, İstanbul FN hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 21, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2019-40016-06

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between the vitamin D replacement and pathological response in patients undergoing biopsy-diagnosed neo-adjuvant therapy according to different molecular subtypes.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings