A Mediterranean Approach to Low FODMAP Diet (MED-LFD) for Managing IBS Symptoms

April 9, 2023 updated by: Arezina Kasti, Attikon Hospital

Mediterranean Diet Adjusted to Low FODMAP Diet (MED-LFD) vs NICE Guidelines for Improving IBS Symptoms: a New Approach for Managing IBS

Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a common functional bowel disorder characterized by absence of any organic cause. The vast majority of patients associate their symptoms with specific food consumption, creating the need for developing a new therapeutic approach based on altering the dietary habits. The aim of the study focuses in the comparison of the efficacy of two dietary patterns, the adjusted to the Mediterranean Diet Low FODMAP Diet (MED-LFD) and the nutritional guidelines of the British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Managing IBS.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a functional bowel disorder. Patients associate their symptoms with specific foods consumption, creating the need for developing a new therapeutic approach based on altering the dietary intake of these patients. Low FODMAP Diet is often used as a first-line treatment based on observations showing that short-chain carbohydrates are not adequately absorbed in the small intestine and exacerbate the symptoms of IBS. Additionally, the Mediterranean diet is a cultural heritage representative of all the countries surrounded by the Mediterranean Sea, described as a diet rich in herbal foods (cereals, fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, olives), with olive oil as the main consumption of fats, high to moderate consumption of fish and seafood, moderate consumption of eggs, poultry, dairy products and alcohol and low consumption of red meat. On the other hand, the nutritional recommendations of British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) managing IBS were created on the grounds of systematic reviews and are based on dietary and lifestyle modifications about caffeine, alcohol, fizzy drinks, fiber, resistant starch, fruits, sorbitol, oat and linseed consumption, meal patterns, probiotics and physical activity.

The direct aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of two dietary patterns, the MED-LFD and the nutritional recommendations of NICE managing IBS. Efficacy will be assessed based on the severity of symptoms. Additionally, possible improvements in quality of life and relief of symptoms between the two groups will be evaluated. Finally, the collected fecal samples will be used to assess the effect of each intervention on gut microbiota.

The sample was calculated to 108 participants with prespecified statistical power 80%, level of significance α=0.05 and 10% adjustment for non-compliance in each group to detect an increase in the primary outcome measure (standard deviation of outcome=60). The above hypothesis of the means was based in the meta-analysis of Peter Varju, et al. 2017. Patients will be recruited by the Department of Clinical Nutrition, Attikon University General Hospital, where the nutritional intervention will be carried out.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
108

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Arezina N. Kasti
  • Phone Number: 6942917860 6942917860
  • Email: kastiare@yahoo.gr

Study Locations

  • Greece
      • Athens, Greece, 12462
        • Attikon University General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fulfillment of the Rome IV criteria for IBS (IBS-D, IBS-M, IBS-U)
  • Provision of written informed consent.
  • Commitment of availability throughout the study period.
  • IBS-SSS > 175

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any concomitant disease requiring specialized nutrition (e.g. renal failure, diabetes, celiac disease, cerebrovascular disease of the central nervous system, major surgical cavity).
  • Pregnancy.
  • Breastfeeding.
  • IBS-C (Bristol Scale type 1 - 2)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Group A
MED-LFD Diet (diet A) for 2 - 6 weeks. After this period there will be a reintroduction phase protocol that will last 6 - 8 weeks.
Other: Med-LFD
All participants of this group at phase 1 (elimination phase), will initially follow the Med- LFD (2-6 weeks). At phase 2 (reintroduction phase), patients will gradually reintroduce foods rich in FODMAPs (6-8 weeks) and test their tolerance. At phase 3 (maintenance phase), following the reintroduction of foods rich in FODMAPs, patients will follow an individualized diet based on their personal tolerance (a combination of high and low FODMAPs).
Active Comparator: Group B
Diet according to guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellent (NICE) Managing IBS (diet B) for 4 weeks.
Other: Nutritional Guidelines of the British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Managing IBS
All participants of this group will be informed to follow a diet based on the nutritional guidelines of the British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for Managing IBS for 4 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of symptoms severity pre and post intervention using a specialized questionnaire.
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 - 8 weeks and 6 months post intervention
IBS- SSS contains 5 specific questions with instructions on how to score them. Each of the five questions (pain severity, pain frequency, abdominal distension severity, bowel movement satisfaction, quality of life) ranges from 0 to a maximum score of 100 using a visual analog scale (VAS) with total scores ranging from 0 to 500, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Subjects can be categorized as having mild (75-175), moderate (175-300), or severe (>300) IBS. A decrease of 50 points is associated with a clinically meaningful improvement.
Baseline, 4 - 8 weeks and 6 months post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of IBS related quality of life with a specialized questionnaire pre and post intervention between groups.
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 - 8 weeks and 6 months post intervention
IBS-QOL - a measure that assesses the degree to which IBS interfered with quality of life over the past 30 days. It is a self-report quality of life measure, which includes domains such as dysphoria, interference with activity, body image, health worry, food avoidance, social relation, sexual and relationship issues. Each of them is rated based on the Likert scale from 1 to 5, the higher the score the lower the quality of life is. The overall score ranges between 34 - 170. A decrease of 10 points or more is a significant improvement.
Baseline, 4 - 8 weeks and 6 months post intervention
Assessment of general quality of life pre and post intervention between groups
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 - 8 weeks and 6 months post intervention
12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) is a 12-item questionnaire used to assess generic health outcomes from the patient's perspective, covering the eight domains of health outcomes: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional & mental health. The items are weighted and summed to provide physical and mental health scores (PCS and MCS). The two composite scores are computed using the scores on the questions that range from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating better health.
Baseline, 4 - 8 weeks and 6 months post intervention
Adequate relief of symptoms after the intervention.
Time Frame: Once per week
Adequate relief (IBS-AR) is a single item questionnaire of pain and discomfort. It poses the question "Over the past week have you had adequate relief of your IBS symptoms?", with a positive or negative answer. Adequate relief is defined as 50% positive answers within the study period, for the purposes of the trial.
Once per week
Assessment of symptoms burden in general pre and post intervention.
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 - 8 weeks and 6 months post intervention
The GSRS questionnaire was originally developed for dyspeptic patients but was later validated in patients with IBS. The GSRS is a 15-item questionnaire designed to assess common gastrointestinal symptoms. The questionnaire has five subscales, reflux, diarrhea, constipation, indigestion, and abdominal pain, with subscale scores ranging from 1 (no discomfort) to 7 (severe discomfort). Higher scores represent higher symptom burden.
Baseline, 4 - 8 weeks and 6 months post intervention
Assessment of anxiety and depression disorders pre and post intervention.
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 - 8 weeks and 6 months post intervention
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire is used for the assessment of anxiety and depression symptoms. It's a 14-item scale with seven items for each subscale, anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D). Each item is scored on a response scale with four alternatives, ranging between 0 and 3. The total score is the sum of the 14 items, and for each subscale the score is the sum of the respective seven items (ranging from 0-21). A final score of 0-7 on each scale indicates that the patient has no symptoms, a score of 8-10 indicates mild symptoms while a score ≥11 indicates severe symptoms of anxiety and depressive disorders.
Baseline, 4 - 8 weeks and 6 months post intervention
Evaluation of the effect of interventions on gut microbiota composition between groups.
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks and 6 months post intervention
Fecal samples will be collected from each participant and stored at -80°C.
Baseline, 2 weeks and 6 months post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Attikon Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Department of Gastroenterology, Central Clinical School, Monash University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Konstantinos Triantafyllou, Attikon Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 3, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 3, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ΕΒΔ435/19-06-2018

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After the completion of the study, please contact with the research team for more information.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the study is published.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Not funded research with similar interest.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea

Clinical Trials on Med-LFD

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings