Relationship Between NLR and Prealbumin Levels With Diaphragm Thickness

December 30, 2019 updated by: Rudyanto Sedono, Indonesia University

Relationship Between Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Prealbumin Serum Levels With Diaphragm Thickness in Critical Patients

A study to find the relationship between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with diaphragm thickness of critical patients in ICU.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Weaning from ventilator sometimes can be failed and it happened due to several factors. One of the causes was Ventilator Induced Diaphragm Dysfunction (VIDD). This VIDD process occurred due to thinning process of the diaphragm thickness or decreased diaphragm muscle mass. The whole process happened due to inflammatory reaction that usually appeared on patients in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Thus, this study was aimed to find the relationship between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with diaphragm thickness of critical patients in ICU.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Indonesia
    • DKI Jakarta
      • Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia, 10430
        • Indonesia University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years to 70 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who are treated in intensive care unit and using mechanical ventilation from Day 0 till Day 5. These patients will be checked for their diaphragm thickness, level of prealbumin serums, and ratio of neutrophil to lymphocyte.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Critical patients treated in intensive care unit using mechanical ventilation from day 0.
  • Patients are clinically predicted to be treated for more than 5 days (qSOFA and clinical assessment)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of suffering from neuromuscular disease and or diaphragmatic malformations
  • Used non-invasive ventilation before starting to use mechanical ventilation
  • History of tracheostomy
  • Patients admitted to ICU within 12 months before this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Normal Diaphragm
Diaphragm thickness is 2 mm or more
Diagnostic test: Ratio of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte
Each patient was examined for a blood sample of 6 ml of venous blood taken from the cubital vein using a vacuum tube without anticoagulants. Blood samples were centrifuged at a speed of 3500 rpm for 20 minutes. Samples are processed with abbott® devices, to obtain neutrophil and serum lymphocyte levels. Plasma samples are stored in the refrigerator -20 C. The patient's diaphragm thickness was measured on days 0, 3, 5 and then the measurement was compared. Diaphragm thickness was measured in patients using mechanical ventilation in intensive care rooms.
Diagnostic test: Level of Prealbumin Serum
Each patient was examined for a blood sample of 6 ml of venous blood taken from the cubital vein using a vacuum tube without anticoagulants. Blood samples were centrifuged at a speed of 3500 rpm for 20 minutes. Samples are processed with abbott® devices, to obtain neutrophil and serum lymphocyte levels. Plasma samples are stored in the refrigerator -20 C. The patient's diaphragm thickness was measured on days 0, 3, 5 and then the measurement was compared. Diaphragm thickness was measured in patients using mechanical ventilation in intensive care rooms.
Thinning Diaphragm
Diaphragm thickness is less than 2 mm
Diagnostic test: Ratio of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte
Each patient was examined for a blood sample of 6 ml of venous blood taken from the cubital vein using a vacuum tube without anticoagulants. Blood samples were centrifuged at a speed of 3500 rpm for 20 minutes. Samples are processed with abbott® devices, to obtain neutrophil and serum lymphocyte levels. Plasma samples are stored in the refrigerator -20 C. The patient's diaphragm thickness was measured on days 0, 3, 5 and then the measurement was compared. Diaphragm thickness was measured in patients using mechanical ventilation in intensive care rooms.
Diagnostic test: Level of Prealbumin Serum
Each patient was examined for a blood sample of 6 ml of venous blood taken from the cubital vein using a vacuum tube without anticoagulants. Blood samples were centrifuged at a speed of 3500 rpm for 20 minutes. Samples are processed with abbott® devices, to obtain neutrophil and serum lymphocyte levels. Plasma samples are stored in the refrigerator -20 C. The patient's diaphragm thickness was measured on days 0, 3, 5 and then the measurement was compared. Diaphragm thickness was measured in patients using mechanical ventilation in intensive care rooms.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Level of Prealbumin Serum
Time Frame: 5 days
5 days
Ratio of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte
Time Frame: 5 days
5 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Indonesia University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Rudyanto Sedono, Indonesia University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 30, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IndonesiaUAnes037

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings