Hostile Bias Modification Training Online Study II (HBMT II)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Silver Spring, Maryland, United States, 20910
- Sleep Research Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult aged 18 and older
- Located in the United States or other primarily English speaking country.
- Active Amazon Account.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Less than 18 years old.
- Not located in the United States or other primarily English speaking country.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
|
Alternative to HBMT training
|
|
Experimental: HBMT
|
Individual is presented with words with some letters missing and told to complete the word.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Hostile Attribution Bias
Time Frame: 24-96 hours post HBMT
|
Adapted from the "Angry Cognitions Scale" (Martin and Dahlen 2007).
Volunteers read hypothetical scenarios where another person acted aggressively but with unclear intent (e.g., "You are driving through a residential area when someone backs their car out of a driveway and nearly hits you.").
Volunteers respond to items (from "Very Unlikely" to "Very Likely") to indicate how they would think about the situation (e.g., "He/she did that just so I'd have to stop.
He/she was trying to scare me.").
Volunteers responded to one set (4 scenarios) at time point one and a second set (5 scenarios) at time point two.
Reponses were summed within each scenario and averaged across scenarios to indicate level of hostile attribution bias.
Individual scores at each time point could range from 0 (no hostile attribution bias) to 24 (high hostile attribution bias).
|
24-96 hours post HBMT
|
|
Driving Aggression
Time Frame: 24-96 hours post HBMT
|
State Aggression Survey: This survey is adapted from several others in the literature to measure variance along the normal spectrum of aggressive behaviors in daily life that the average person might display (Álvarez-García, et al., 2016; Deffenbacher, et al., 2001; Deffenbacher, J. et al., 2002).
The survey specifically asks about driving behaviors (e.g., yelling at other drivers).
Scoring is count of aggressive behaviors during reporting period.
|
24-96 hours post HBMT
|
|
Aggression On Social Media
Time Frame: 24-96 hours post treatment
|
Seven items adapted from the Cyber-Aggression Questionnaire for Adolescents by Álvarez-García et al. (2016).
Volunteers reported at time point two how often (during preceding 24 h) they engaged in various aggressive online behaviors (e.g., posted rude comments about someone on a social network).
Response choices ranged from 1 = never to 4 = always.
Scores were recorded dichotomously to represent whether a volunteer reported any online aggression during the reporting period (i.e.
"never" was recoded as "0" to indicate no aggression, and all other responses were recoded as "1" to indicate at least some aggression.
A higher percentage of volunteers in a study condition reporting usage of aggression on social media indicates a worse outcome for that study condition.
|
24-96 hours post treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Anger
Time Frame: 24-96 hours post HBMT
|
Trait Anger Scale: Brief measure of trait anger validated by Wilk et al., (2015).
Scale (1-5, strongly disagree to strongly agree); Two questions regarding individual's perspective on their anger.
Higher values indicate greater anger.
|
24-96 hours post HBMT
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- WRAIR #2628
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.