Bone Healing at Implants Installed in Sites Prepared Either With a Sonic Device or Drills
Bone Healing at Implants Installed in Sites Prepared Either With a Sonic Device or Drills. A Split-mouth Histomorphometric Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Cartagena
-
Cartagena de Indias, Cartagena, Colombia, 5710
- Colombia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- presence of an edentulous atrophic zone in the posterior segment of the maxilla
- height of the sinus floor ≥10 mm
- ≥ 25 years of age;
- smoking ≤10 cigarettes per day
- good general health
- no contraindication for oral surgical procedures
- not being pregnant.
Exclusion Criteria:
- presence of systemic disorders
- chemotherapy or radiotherapy
- smokers >10 cigarettes per day
- previous bone augmentation procedures in the same region.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: TRIPLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control Site -Drill site
The control sites (Drills) will be prepared with a lanceolate drill (FS 230, Sweden / Martina), with a maximum diameter of 2.3 mm,
|
Full-thickness muco-periosteal flaps will be elevated, and the alveolar bone exposed to prepare the bed for the implant installation
Other Names:
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Test site -sonic site
test sites will be prepared with conical diamond inserts of increasing diameter (SFS99.000.014 to SFS99.000.024,
Komet-Brasseler-GmbH, Germany) mounted on a sonic-air surgical instrument
|
Full-thickness muco-periosteal flaps will be elevated, and the alveolar bone exposed to prepare the bed for the implant installation
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
New bone in contact with the implant surface
Time Frame: After 2 weeks to evaluate the healing prior to load with a prosthesis
|
The percentages of new bone in contact with the implant surface will be evaluated in the histomorphometric analysis
|
After 2 weeks to evaluate the healing prior to load with a prosthesis
|
|
New bone in contact with the implant surface
Time Frame: After 6 weeks, to evaluate the healing prior to load with a prosthesis
|
The percentages of new bone in contact with the implant surface will be evaluated in the histomorphometric analysis
|
After 6 weeks, to evaluate the healing prior to load with a prosthesis
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The percentage of total mineralized bone in contact with the implant surface.
Time Frame: After 2 weeks to evaluate the healing prior to load with a prosthesis
|
The percentages of new bone in contact with the implant surface will be evaluated in the histomorphometric analysis
|
After 2 weeks to evaluate the healing prior to load with a prosthesis
|
|
The percentage of total mineralized bone in contact with the implant surface.
Time Frame: After 6 weeks to evaluate the healing prior to load with a prosthesis
|
The percentages of new bone in contact with the implant surface will be evaluated in the histomorphometric analysis
|
After 6 weeks to evaluate the healing prior to load with a prosthesis
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
pre-existing (old) bone, soft tissues (marrow spaces, Haversian canals, BMUs canals), bone debris/ clot remnants, and vessels
Time Frame: After 2 weeks to evaluate the early haling prior to load with a prosthesis
|
The percentages of pre-existing (old) bone, soft tissues (marrow spaces, Haversian canals, BMUs canals), bone debris/ clot remnants and vessels in contact with the implant surface will be evaluated in the histomorphometric analysis.
|
After 2 weeks to evaluate the early haling prior to load with a prosthesis
|
|
pre-existing (old) bone, soft tissues (marrow spaces, Haversian canals, BMUs canals), bone debris/ clot remnants, and vessels
Time Frame: After 6 weeks to evaluate the early haling prior to load with a prosthesis
|
The percentages of pre-existing (old) bone, soft tissues (marrow spaces, Haversian canals, BMUs canals), bone debris/ clot remnants and vessels in contact with the implant surface will be evaluated in the histomorphometric analysis.
|
After 6 weeks to evaluate the early haling prior to load with a prosthesis
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NHM, Tawse-Smith A, Duncan WJ. Piezoelectric versus conventional implant site preparation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Apr;20(2):261-270. doi: 10.1111/cid.12555. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
- Bengazi F, Lang NP, Canciani E, Vigano P, Velez JU, Botticelli D. Osseointegration of implants with dendrimers surface characteristics installed conventionally or with Piezosurgery(R). A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jan;25(1):10-5. doi: 10.1111/clr.12082. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
- Vigano P, Botticelli D, Salata LA, Schweikert MT, Urbizo Velez J, Lang NP. Healing at implant sites prepared conventionally or by means of Sonosurgery (R). An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Apr;26(4):377-382. doi: 10.1111/clr.12348. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
- Maurer P, Kriwalsky MS, Block Veras R, Vogel J, Syrowatka F, Heiss C. Micromorphometrical analysis of conventional osteotomy techniques and ultrasonic osteotomy at the rabbit skull. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jun;19(6):570-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01516.x.
- Schaeren S, Jaquiery C, Heberer M, Tolnay M, Vercellotti T, Martin I. Assessment of nerve damage using a novel ultrasonic device for bone cutting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Mar;66(3):593-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.03.025. No abstract available.
- Stacchi C, Berton F, Turco G, Franco M, Navarra CO, Andolsek F, Maglione M, Di Lenarda R. Micromorphometric analysis of bone blocks harvested with eight different ultrasonic and sonic devices for osseous surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Sep;44(9):1143-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.04.024. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
- Amghar-Maach S, Sanchez-Torres A, Camps-Font O, Gay-Escoda C. Piezoelectric surgery versus conventional drilling for implant site preparation: a meta-analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 2018 Oct;62(4):391-396. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 May 26. Erratum In: J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Oct;64(4):520-521.
- Sendyk DI, de Oliveira NK, Pannuti CM, da Graca Naclerio-Homem M, Wennerberg A, Deboni MCZ. Conventional Drilling Versus Piezosurgery for Implant Site Preparation: A Meta-Analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2018 Oct;44(5):400-405. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00091. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
- Stacchi C, Vercellotti T, Torelli L, Furlan F, Di Lenarda R. Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: twist drills versus piezosurgery. A single-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Apr;15(2):188-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00341.x. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
- Preti G, Martinasso G, Peirone B, Navone R, Manzella C, Muzio G, Russo C, Canuto RA, Schierano G. Cytokines and growth factors involved in the osseointegration of oral titanium implants positioned using piezoelectric bone surgery versus a drill technique: a pilot study in minipigs. J Periodontol. 2007 Apr;78(4):716-22. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060285.
- Geminiani A, Papadimitriou DE, Ercoli C. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a sonic handpiece for the osteotomy of the lateral window: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Nov;106(5):279-83. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)00143-0.
- Geminiani A, Weitz DS, Ercoli C, Feng C, Caton JG, Papadimitriou DE. A comparative study of the incidence of Schneiderian membrane perforations during maxillary sinus augmentation with a sonic oscillating handpiece versus a conventional turbine handpiece. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Apr;17(2):327-34. doi: 10.1111/cid.12110. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
- Papadimitriou DE, Geminiani A, Zahavi T, Ercoli C. Sonosurgery for atraumatic tooth extraction: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Dec;108(6):339-43. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)00169-2.
- Agabiti I, Cappare P, Gherlone EF, Mortellaro C, Bruschi GB, Crespi R. New surgical technique and distraction osteogenesis for ankylosed dental movement. J Craniofac Surg. 2014 May;25(3):828-30. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000737.
- Agabiti I, Bernardello F, Nevins M, Wang HL. Impacted canine extraction by ridge expansion using air scaler surgical instruments: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014 Sep-Oct;34(5):681-7. doi: 10.11607/prd.1884.
- Agabiti I, Botticelli D. Two-Stage Ridge Split at Narrow Alveolar Mandibular Bone Ridges. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Oct;75(10):2115.e1-2115.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 24.
- Heinemann F, Hasan I, Kunert-Keil C, Gotz W, Gedrange T, Spassov A, Schweppe J, Gredes T. Experimental and histological investigations of the bone using two different oscillating osteotomy techniques compared with conventional rotary osteotomy. Ann Anat. 2012 Mar 20;194(2):165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.10.005. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
- Caneva M, Lang NP, Calvo Guirado JL, Spriano S, Iezzi G, Botticelli D. Bone healing at bicortically installed implants with different surface configurations. An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Mar;26(3):293-9. doi: 10.1111/clr.12475. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
- Ferri M, Lang NP, Angarita Alfonso EE, Bedoya Quintero ID, Burgos EM, Botticelli D. Use of sonic instruments for implant biopsy retrieval. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Nov;26(11):1237-43. doi: 10.1111/clr.12466. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
- Botticelli D, Lang NP. Dynamics of osseointegration in various human and animal models - a comparative analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jun;28(6):742-748. doi: 10.1111/clr.12872. Epub 2016 May 23.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- protocol #05-2014
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Alveolar Bone Loss
-
NCT01878084CompletedBone Loss | Horizontal Alveolar Bone Loss | Vertical Alveolar Bone Loss
-
NCT06879171Not yet recruitingAlveolar Ridge Preservation | Autogenous Tooth Graft | Horizontal Alveolar Bone Loss | Vertical Alveolar Bone Loss | Delayed Implant
-
NCT07574853Not yet recruitingAlveolar Bone Loss* / Therapy
-
NCT04998058Not yet recruitingAlveolar Bone Loss | Bone Loss, Alveolar | Grafting Bone | Alveolar Bone Atrophy | Bone Loss, Osteoclastic
-
NCT03927937UnknownTooth Loss | Bone Loss, Alveolar | Bone Atrophy, Alveolar
-
NCT07611617Not yet recruitingPeriodontitis | Alveolar Bone Loss* / Therapy
-
NCT07475507Active, not recruitingProsthesis | Bone Loss, Alveolar | Prosthodontics | Implants, Dental
-
NCT05610748Active, not recruitingBone Loss, Alveolar | Dehiscence | Alveolar Ridge Enlargement
-
NCT07162389Active, not recruitingAlveolar Bone Atrophy
Clinical Trials on implant placement
-
NCT05940662SuspendedComplications | Patient Reported Outcome Measures | Cost-Benefit Analysis | Cost-effectiveness | Esthetic Zone | Single Tooth Dental Implant | Single Tooth Lost | Accuracy of Dental Implants | Dimensional Changes | Implant Survival and Success
-
NCT02814149RecruitingJaw, Edentulous, Partially | Acquired Absence of Single Tooth
-
NCT06760442RecruitingImplant Therapy | Augmentation, Alveolar Ridge
-
NCT06985511Completed
-
NCT06417788RecruitingPartially Edentulous Patients | Bone Crest of at Least 10 mm Length and 6 mm Width | Patients of at Least 18 Years Old
-
NCT06254885RecruitingImplant Site Reaction
-
NCT06554080Active, not recruitingTooth Loss | Dental Implant Failed | Implant Complication
-
NCT07468747Not yet recruitingTooth Loss | Peri-implant Bone Loss | Edentulism
-
NCT04432519CompletedDental Implant Failed
-
NCT06666062Active, not recruitingLaser Effect Around Dental Implant