Group-Based Intervention to Improve Mental Health and Adherence Among Youth Living With HIV in Low Resource Settings

May 21, 2026 updated by: International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group

IMPAACT 2016 - Evaluating a Group-Based Intervention to Improve Mental Health and Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Adherence Among Youth Living With HIV in Low Resource Settings

IMPAACT 2016 was a multi-site, two-arm, individually randomized, controlled study to evaluate whether an Indigenous Leader Outreach Model (ILOM) of trauma-informed cognitive behavioral therapy (TI-CBT) delivered by Indigenous Youth Leaders (IYL) is associated with improved mental health outcomes and ART adherence among youth living with HIV in resource-limited settings. The intervention was adapted to the local context through advance conduct of focus groups and pilot testing.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

IMPAACT 2016 was a multi-site, two-arm, individually randomized, controlled study to evaluate whether an Indigenous Leader Outreach Model (ILOM) of trauma-informed cognitive behavioral therapy (TI-CBT) delivered by Indigenous Youth Leaders (IYL) is associated with improved mental health outcomes and ART adherence among youth living with HIV in resource-limited settings. The trial was preceded by an adaption of the TI-CBT Intervention at each site using the "ADAPT-ITT" model, which included focus groups and pilot tests. Participant-level data was not collected during the focus group phase, and the pilot phase consent form specified that collected data would not be analyzed. Per protocol, only data from the randomized trial were analyzed. The study was closed early due to the funding constraints.

In the randomized study, youth were individually randomized to either the TI-CBT Intervention arm or the Discussion Control arm. Youth participants met as a group within their randomized arm and received multiple group sessions within an 8-week period. Each arm featured 15 groups with an average of 8.5 youth per group, or a total of 254 youth in the Randomized Trial. TI-CBT Intervention and Discussion Control groups could be mixed-gender, which required at least two participants of each gender. Caregivers (with consent and youth permission) were assigned to the same study arm as their youth. Caregiver participants met as a group within their arm for two caregiver-specific sessions on two separate weeks, separate from their youth's group sessions. Each arm featured 15 groups with an average of 7.7 caregivers per group, or a total of 230 caregivers in the Randomized Trial. Youth and caregivers completed a follow-up assessment immediately after their last group session and two additional follow-up assessments at 6 and 12 months. Youth and caregivers received 1 two-hour booster group session consistent with their assigned study arm immediately after the 6-month assessments. The booster sessions were intended to enhance treatment effects and increase sustainability.

Following completion of 6-month assessments (primary timepoint), data were analyzed to determine the short-term effects of the interventions. Additional analyses to assess long-term effects of the interventions, including the effects of the booster group session, will be performed after the completion of 12-month assessments.

Results are reported for youth participants in the randomized trial only, because limited sociodemographic characteristics and no primary or secondary outcome measures were collected for caregivers. As specified in the protocol and statistical analysis plan, primary outcomes were analyzed with groups as the analytic units due to the presence of intracluster correlation among participants in the same group.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
484

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Botswana
      • Gaborone, Botswana
        • Gaborone Prevention/Treatment Trials CRS 12701
      • Molepolole, Botswana
        • Molepolole Prevention/Treatment Trials CRS 12702
  • Malawi
      • Blantyre, Malawi
        • College of Medicine CRS 30301
      • Lilongwe, Malawi
        • University of North Carolina Lilongwe CRS 12001
  • South Africa
      • Soweto, South Africa
        • Soweto IMPAACT CRS 8052
  • Zimbabwe
      • Chitungwiza, Zimbabwe
        • St. Mary's CRS 30303
      • Harare, Zimbabwe
        • Harare Family Care CRS 31890
      • Harare, Zimbabwe
        • Seke North CRS 30306

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 19 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria - For Youth Participants:

  • If of legal age to provide independent informed consent as determined by site Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and consistent with site IRB/EC policies and procedures: potential youth participant is willing and able to provide written informed consent for study participation.
  • If not of legal age to provide independent informed consent: Parent or guardian is willing and able to provide written informed consent for study participation and potential youth participant is willing and able to provide written informed assent for study participation.
  • Confirmed HIV-infection based on documented testing of two samples collected at different time points as documented in medical records or by confirmatory testing.
  • Age limit 15-19 years
  • At screening, aware of his or her HIV infection, as confirmed by Investigator of Record or designee.
  • At screening, has been prescribed ART for a minimum of 24 weeks prior to screening based on medical record documentation.

  • At screening, meets at least one of the following indicators of moderate to severe mental health symptomology:

    • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score ≥ 10
    • General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score ≥ 10
    • UCLA Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-Reaction Index (UCLA PTSD-RI) score >= 35

Inclusion Criteria - For Caregiver Participants:

  • Caregiver, defined as a biological parent, legal guardian, or person who provides emotional, psychological and/or informational care to a youth taking part in the Randomized Trial, as identified by the youth, and for whom the youth has provided written permission to participate in the study.
  • Of legal age to provide independent consent and willing and able to provide written informed consent for study participation.

Exclusion Criteria - For Youth Participants:

  • At entry, participating in a study delivering a mental health or ART adherence intervention.
  • Prior participation in an IMPAACT 2016 Focus Group or Pilot Test
  • Any other condition, adverse social situation or cognitive impairment that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would preclude informed assent and informed consent, make study participation unsafe, complicate interpretation of study outcome data, or otherwise interfere with achieving the study objectives.

Exclusion Criteria - For Caregiver Participants:

Prior participation in an IMPAACT 2016 Focus Group or Pilot Test.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Youth TI-CBT Intervention Arm
For youth, the TI-CBT intervention arm consisted of six 2-hour TI-CBT group sessions led by Indigenous Youth Leaders (IYL) during weeks 1 to 8 and one 2-hour booster group session at 6-months. The TI-CBT Intervention was delivered in a group format. The TI-CBT Intervention arm had 15 groups with an average of 8.5 youth per group (range 6-11).
Behavioral: Youth TI-CBT Intervention Arm
For youth, each TI-CBT group session was led by IYL. TI-CBT teaches techniques and ways to manage distress through psychosocial health education, cognitive restructuring, and "mastery of trauma", which refers to the process by which survivors of psychological trauma work through the traumatic experience in a meaningful way, and are able to move on with life. TI-CBT addresses both the trauma of learning one has HIV and the trauma associated with managing a chronic and stigmatized illness. The intervention highlights links between HIV and traditional gender roles, gender inequities, and gender-based violence. Finally, the relaxation training teaches youth strategies to relax and these are integrated at the beginning and end of each session. TI-CBT Youth Intervention Manuals were distributed to sites for translation, backtranslation, and cultural adaptation in preparation for the Randomized Trial.
Active Comparator: Youth Discussion Control Arm
For youth, the Discussion Control arm consisted of six 2-hour discussion group sessions led by IYL during weeks 1 to 8 and one 2-hour booster discussion group session at 6 months. The Discussion Control was delivered in a group format. The Discussion Control arm had 15 groups with an average of 8.4 youth per group (range 5-10).
Behavioral: Youth Discussion Control Arm
For youth, each discussion group session was led by IYL. Discussion topics were selected by youth in the group. Discussion Control sessions took place at a separate time from TI-CBT Intervention sessions to minimize contamination. Youth and caregiver group sessions were also held separately.
Experimental: Caregiver TI-CBT Intervention Arm
For caregivers, the TI-CBT Intervention arm consisted of two 2-hour TI-CBT group sessions on two separate weeks within 8 weeks of their youth's first group session and one 2-hour booster group session at 6-months led by adult study staff. The TI-CBT Intervention was delivered in group format. The TI-CBT Intervention arm had 15 groups with an average of 7.7 caregivers per group (range 5-10).
Behavioral: Caregiver TI-CBT Intervention Arm
For caregivers, each TI-CBT group session was led by adult study staff. TI-CBT teaches techniques and ways to manage distress through psychosocial health education, cognitive restructuring, and "mastery of trauma", which refers to the process by which survivors of psychological trauma work through the traumatic experience in a meaningful way, and are able to move on with life. TI-CBT addresses both the trauma of learning one has HIV and the trauma associated with managing a chronic and stigmatized illness. The intervention highlights links between HIV and traditional gender roles, gender inequities, and gender-based violence. Finally, the relaxation training teaches strategies to relax and these are integrated at the beginning and end of each session. TI-CBT Caregiver Intervention Manuals were distributed to sites for translation, backtranslation, and cultural adaptation in preparation for the Randomized Trial.
Active Comparator: Caregivers Discussion Control Arm
For caregivers, the Discussion Control arm consisted of: two 2-hour discussion group sessions on two separate weeks within 8 weeks of their youth's first group session and one 2-hour booster discussion group session at 6 months led by adult study staff. The Discussion Control intervention was delivered in a group format. The Discussion Control arm had 15 groups with an average of 7.6 caregivers per group (range 3-10).
Behavioral: Caregiver Discussion Control Arm
For caregivers, each discussion group session was led by adult study staff. Discussion topics were selected by caregivers in the group. Discussion Control sessions took place at a separate time from TI-CBT Intervention sessions to minimize contamination. Youth and caregiver group sessions were also held separately.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Group-level Mean General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) at 6 Months
Time Frame: at 6 months
Average (standard deviation) of the group-level mean General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score within arm. The GAD-7 features 7 items assessing frequency of anxiety symptoms over the past 2 weeks on a scale from 0="Not at all" to 3="Nearly every day". Responses to the 7 items are summed to obtain a GAD-7 score ranging from 0 (least) to 21 (most severe symptoms). A score of 10 or more points indicates moderate to severe anxiety symptoms.
at 6 months
Group-level Mean UCLA Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-Reaction Index (UCLA-PTSD-RI) at 6 Months
Time Frame: at 6 months
Average (standard deviation) of the group-level mean UCLA Post Traumatic Stress Disorder-Reaction Index (PTSD-RI) score within arm. The UCLA PTSD-RI assesses DSM-IV criteria for PTSD in youth. If prior trauma is endorsed, assessment asks whether 31 PTSD symptoms have occurred within the past month on a scale from 0="None" to 4="Most of the time". A scoring algorithm is applied to the 31 items to calculate a score ranging from 0 (least) to 80 (most severe symptoms). A score of 35 or more indicates moderate to severe PTSD symptoms. If no trauma is endorsed, no score is calculated.
at 6 months
Group-level Mean Composite Mental Health Measure at 6 Months
Time Frame: at 6 months
Average (standard deviation) of the group-level mean Composite score within arm. Composite scores are a study-specific measure of combined mental health symptoms. A participant's PHQ-9, GAD-7, and UCLA PTSD-RI scores at the given timepoint are each standardized according to baseline to get Z scores. The 3 Z scores are summed to obtain a Composite score. Composite scores are not Z scores themselves and can range from -Inf to +Inf, with greater scores reflecting more severe symptoms overall. Composite scores of 0 at baseline represent average symptom levels overall, but otherwise do not have a meaningful central value.
at 6 months
Group-level Mean Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at 6 Months
Time Frame: at 6 months
Average (standard deviation) of the group-level mean Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score within arm. The PHQ-9 features 9 items assessing the frequency of depression symptoms over the past 2 weeks on a scale from 0="Not at all" to 3="Nearly every day". Responses to the 9 items are summed to obtain a PHQ-9 score ranging from 0 (least) to 27 (most severe symptoms). A score of 10 or more points indicates moderate to severe depression symptoms.
at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Group-level Mean General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) at IPL (Immediately Post-Last Group Session)
Time Frame: After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)
Average (standard deviation) of the group-level mean General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score within arm. The GAD-7 features 7 items assessing frequency of anxiety symptoms over the past 2 weeks on a scale from 0="Not at all" to 3="Nearly every day". Responses to the 7 items are summed to obtain a GAD-7 score ranging from 0 (least) to 21 (most severe symptoms). A score of 10 or more points indicates moderate to severe anxiety symptoms.
After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)
Group-level Mean Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at IPL (Immediately Post Last Group Session)
Time Frame: After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)
Average (standard deviation) of the group-level mean Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score within arm. The PHQ-9 features 9 items assessing the frequency of depression symptoms over the past 2 weeks on a scale from 0="Not at all" to 3="Nearly every day". Responses to the 9 items are summed to obtain a PHQ-9 score ranging from 0 (least) to 27 (most severe symptoms). A score of 10 or more points indicates moderate to severe depression symptoms.
After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)
Group-level Mean UCLA Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-Reaction Index (UCLA PTSD-RI) at IPL (Immediately Post-Last Group Session)
Time Frame: After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)
Average (standard deviation) of the group-level mean UCLA Post Traumatic Stress Disorder-Reaction Index (PTSD-RI) score within arm. The UCLA PTSD-RI assesses DSM-IV criteria for PTSD in youth. If prior trauma is endorsed, assessment asks whether 31 PTSD symptoms have occurred within the past month on a scale from 0="None" to 4="Most of the time". A scoring algorithm is applied to the 31 items to calculate a score ranging from 0 (least) to 80 (most severe symptoms). A score of 35 or more indicates moderate to severe PTSD symptoms. If no trauma is endorsed, no score is calculated.
After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)
Group-level Mean Composite Mental Health Measure at IPL (Immediately Post-Last Group Session)
Time Frame: After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)
Average (standard deviation) of the group-level mean Composite score within arm. Composite scores are a study-specific measure of combined mental health symptoms. A participant's PHQ-9, GAD-7, and UCLA PTSD-RI scores at the given timepoint are each standardized according to baseline to get Z scores. The 3 Z scores are summed to obtain a Composite score. Composite scores are not Z scores themselves and can range from -Inf to +Inf, with greater scores reflecting more severe symptoms overall. Composite scores of 0 at baseline represent average symptom levels overall, but otherwise do not have a meaningful central value.
After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)
Group-level Mean ART Adherence at 6 Months
Time Frame: at 6 months
Average (standard deviation) of the group-level mean antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence score within arm. The Wilson 3-Item Adherence Scale assessed self-reported ART adherence. Within the past 30 days, the 3 items correspond to missed daily doses (0-30), adherence to medication instructions ("Very poor" to "Excellent"), and frequency of perfect use ("Never" to "Always"). Responses on the three items are transformed linearly to scores between 0 and 100 points and averaged to obtain a single score. Scores range from 0 (worst) possible adherence to 100 (best possible adherence).
at 6 months
Viral Load at 6 Months
Time Frame: at 6 months
HIV-1 RNA
at 6 months
Group-level Mean ART Adherence at IPL (Immediately Post-Last Group Session).
Time Frame: After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks).
Self-report - Wilson 3-item scale (range 0-100, higher=better)
After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks).
Viral Load at IPL (Immediately Post-Last Group Session)
Time Frame: After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)
HIV-1 RNA
After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Dorothy Dow, MD, MSc, Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Dow DE, Libous J, Ponatshego PL, Masheto G, Mvalo T, Payesa C, Buckley J, Stranix-Chibanda L, Nematadzira T, Vhembo T, Ace A, Warshaw M, Townley E, Lee S, Allison S, Donenberg G and the IMPAACT 2016 Team. High levels of mental distress among youth with HIV in Southern Africa: A description of enrollment into IMPAACT 2016, a randomized controlled trial of a peer-led, group-based mental health intervention. Presented at IAS, Kigali, Rwanda, 15 July 2025.
  • Libous J, Jeffrey R, George K, Montañez N, Warshaw M, Shakes Raesi M, Ponatshego PL, Maliwichi L, Vhembo T, Mutasa T, Bere CT, Galvin L, Townley E, Varechtchouk O, Dow D, Donenberg G, and the IMPAACT 2016 Team. IMPAACT 2016: The ADAPT-ITT Framework Leveraging Youth and Supporter Voices in the Adaptation of a Trauma-Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Group-Based Intervention for Youth Living with HIV and Mental Health Distress. Presented at Fast Track Cities, Paris, France, 13-15 October 2024.
  • Vhemo T, Mhembere T, Mbengeranwa T, Bere TC, Mutasa T, Katsande R, Gumbo J, Mudzonga N, Nematadzira T, Maturure SJ, Mandima PF, Maonera S, Stranix-Chibanda L. High Prevalence of Common Mental Health Disorders Amongst Adolescents With HIV in Zimbabwe: IMPAACT 2016; Presented at International Workshop on Pediatrics & HIV, Munich, Germany, 19-20 July 2024.
  • Libous JL, Montañez N, Donenberg G, Kapetanovic S, Dow D. IMPAACT 2016: Operationalizing the ADAPT-ITT Model to drive local adaptation of an intervention to improve mental health and medication adherence in youth living with HIV. Presented at Society for Clinical Research Associates 29th Annual Conference, Virtual, 23-26 September 2020.
  • Warshaw M, Dow D, Kapetanovic S, Libous J, Reding C, Montañez , Donenberg G. IMPAACT 2016: Interdisciplinary Collaboration at Multiple Levels. Society for Clinical Trials 41st Annual Meeting, Baltimore, MD (Virtual), 2020.
  • Libous JL, Montanez NA, Dow DE, Kapetanovic S, Buckley J, Kakhu TJ, Kamthunzi P, Maliwichi LA, Vhembo T, Chawana TD, Nematadzira T, Donenberg GR. IMPAACT 2016: Operationalizing HIV Intervention Adaptations to Inform the Science and Outcomes of Implementation. Front Reprod Health. 2021 May 28;3:662912. doi: 10.3389/frph.2021.662912. eCollection 2021.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 27, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 5, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 2, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 21, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IMPAACT 2016
  • DAIDS ID #38506 (Other Identifier: DAIDS/NIAID/NIH)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie results in the publication, after deidentification.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning three months following publication and available throughout period of funding of the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trial (IMPAACT) Network by NIH.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use of the data that is approved by the IMPAACT Network.

Types of Analyses: Specifically for the types of analyses needed to achieve aims in the proposal approved by the IMPAACT Network.

Mechanism: Researchers may submit a request for access to data using the IMPAACT "Data Request" form at: https://www.impaactnetwork.org/studies/submit-research-proposal. Researchers of approved proposals will need to sign an IMPAACT Data Use Agreement before receiving the data.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV-1-infection

Clinical Trials on Youth TI-CBT Intervention Arm

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings