Group-Based Intervention to Improve Mental Health and Adherence Among Youth Living With HIV in Low Resource Settings

IMPAACT 2016 - Evaluating a Group-Based Intervention to Improve Mental Health and Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Adherence Among Youth Living With HIV in Low Resource Settings

IMPAACT 2016 is a multi-site, two-arm, individually randomized, controlled study to evaluate whether an Indigenous Leader Outreach Model (ILOM) of trauma-informed cognitive behavioral therapy (TI-CBT) delivered by Indigenous Youth Leaders (IYL) is associated with improved mental health outcomes and ART adherence among youth living with HIV in resource-limited settings. The intervention is adapted to the local context through advance conduct of focus groups and pilot testing.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

IMPAACT 2016 is a multi-site, two-arm, individually randomized, controlled study to evaluate whether an Indigenous Leader Outreach Model (ILOM) of trauma-informed cognitive behavioral therapy (TI-CBT) delivered by Indigenous Youth Leaders (IYL) is associated with improved mental health outcomes and ART adherence among youth living with HIV in resource-limited settings. To adapt the intervention for the local context, the trial will be preceded by an adaption of the TI-CBT intervention at each site using the "ADAPT-ITT" model, which includes focus groups and pilot tests. In the randomized study, youth will be individually randomized to either the TI-CBT Intervention Arm or the Discussion Control Arm. Participants will meet as a group within their randomized arm and receive multiple group sessions within an eight-week period. Each group will include an average of eight youth for an approximate total of 192-256 youth in the Randomized Trial (96-128 youth per arm). TI-CBT and Discussion Control groups in each arm will be mixed-gender unless it is determined necessary to have single-gender groups during the focus group. Caregivers (as available and with youth permission) will be assigned to the same study arm as their youth. Caregivers will meet as a group for two caregiver-specific sessions on two separate weeks and separate from their youth group sessions. Youth and caregivers will complete a follow-up visit immediately after their last group session and two additional follow-up visits at six and 12 months. Youth and caregivers will also receive one two-hour booster group session consistent with their assigned study arm immediately after the six-month evaluations. The booster sessions are intended to enhance treatment effects and increase sustainability. Once all participants have completed their six-month evaluations, data from these evaluations will be analyzed to determine the short-term effects of the intervention. Additional analyses to assess the longer-term effects of the intervention, including the effects of the booster group session, will be performed after the completion of follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

256

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Gaborone, Botswana
        • Recruiting
        • Gaborone Prevention/Treatment Trials CRS 12701
        • Contact:
      • Molepolole, Botswana
        • Recruiting
        • Molepolole Prevention/Treatment Trials CRS 12702
        • Contact:
      • Blantyre, Malawi
        • Recruiting
        • College of Medicine CRS 30301
        • Contact:
      • Lilongwe, Malawi
        • Recruiting
        • University of North Carolina Lilongwe CRS 12001
        • Contact:
      • Soweto, South Africa
        • Recruiting
        • Soweto IMPAACT CRS 8052
        • Contact:
      • Chitungwiza, Zimbabwe
        • Recruiting
        • St. Mary's CRS 30303
        • Contact:
      • Harare, Zimbabwe
      • Harare, Zimbabwe
        • Recruiting
        • Seke North CRS 30306
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 19 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria - For Youth Participants:

  • At screening, 15-19 years old.
  • If of legal age to provide independent informed consent as determined by site Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and consistent with site IRB/EC policies and procedures: potential youth participant is willing and able to provide written informed consent for study participation.
  • If not of legal age to provide independent informed consent: Parent or guardian is willing and able to provide written informed consent for study participation and potential youth participant is willing and able to provide written informed assent for study participation.
  • Confirmed HIV-infection based on documented testing of two samples collected at different time points as documented in medical records or by confirmatory testing.
  • At screening, aware of his or her HIV infection, as confirmed by Investigator of Record or designee.
  • At screening, has been prescribed ART for a minimum of 24 weeks prior to screening based on medical record documentation.
  • At screening, meets at least one of the following indicators of moderate to severe mental health symptomology:

    • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score ≥ 10
    • General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score ≥ 10
    • UCLA Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-Reaction Index (UCLA PTSD-RI) score > 35

Inclusion Criteria - For Caregiver Participants:

  • Caregiver, defined as a biological parent, legal guardian, or person who provides emotional, psychological and/or informational care to a youth taking part in the Randomized Trial, as identified by the youth, and for whom the youth has provided written permission to participate in the study.
  • Of legal age to provide independent consent and willing and able to provide written informed consent for study participation.

Exclusion Criteria - For Youth Participants:

  • At entry, participating in a study delivering a mental health or ART adherence intervention.
  • Has prior participation in an IMPAACT 2016 Focus Group or Pilot Test
  • Any other condition, adverse social situation or cognitive impairment that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would preclude informed assent and informed consent, make study participation unsafe, complicate interpretation of study outcome data, or otherwise interfere with achieving the study objectives.

Exclusion Criteria - For Caregiver Participants:

Has prior participation in an IMPAACT 2016 Focus Group or Pilot Test.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TI-CBT Intervention Arm
In the Randomized Trial, youth participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio with their caregivers to one of two study arms. One arm is the TI-CBT intervention arm consisting of: six 2-hour TI-CBT group sessions lead by Indigenous Youth Leaders (IYL) during weeks 1 - 6 and one 2-hour booster group session at 6-months. The caregivers (willing to participate with youth permission) for youth who are enrolled into the TI-CBT arm will be enrolled onto the same arm, and receive two 2-hour group sessions led by adult study staff during weeks 1-6 and one 2-hour booster group session at 6-months. The youth and caregiver sessions are held separately.
TI-CBT teaches techniques and ways to manage distress through psychosocial health education, cognitive restructuring, and "mastery of trauma", which refers to the process by which survivors of psychological trauma work through the traumatic experience in a meaningful way, and are able to move on with life. TI-CBT addresses both the trauma of learning one has HIV and the trauma associated with managing a chronic and stigmatized illness. The intervention highlights links between HIV and traditional gender roles, gender inequities, and gender based violence. Finally, the relaxation training teaches youth strategies to relax and these are integrated at the beginning and end of each session. TI-CBT Youth and Caregiver Intervention Manuals are distributed to sites for translation, backtranslation, and cultural adaptation in preparation for the Randomized Trial.
Active Comparator: Discussion Control Arm
Arm two is the discussion control arm consisting of: six 2 hour discussion group sessions lead by IYL during weeks 1-6 and one 2-hour booster discussion group session at 6 months. The caregivers (willing to participate with youth permission) for youth randomized to the discussion control arm will have two 2-hour discussion group sessions led by adult study staff during weeks 1-6 and one 2-hour booster discussion group session at 6 months. The youth and caregiver sessions are held separately.
Each youth discussion control group session will be led by IYL and each caregiver discussion control group will be led by adult study staff. Discussion topics will be selected by youth and caregivers in the group as applicable. Discussion Control group session will take place at a separate time from TI-CBT youth group sessions in attempt to minimize contamination. To note, participant and caregiver group sessions are always held separately.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Time Frame: at 6-months
(PHQ-9, measure of depression: range 0-27, higher=worse)
at 6-months
General Anxiety Disorder-7
Time Frame: at 6-months
(GAD-7, measure of anxiety: range 0-21, higher=worse)
at 6-months
UCLA Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-Reaction Index
Time Frame: at 6-months
(UCLA PTSD-RI, measure of TPSD: range 0-51, higher=worse)
at 6-months
Composite mental health measure
Time Frame: at 6-months
(measure of combined mental health issues: PHQ-9, GAD-7, and UCLA PTSD-RI scores will be standardized to have mean=0, standard deviation=1, and then summed; higher=worse)
at 6-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Time Frame: after initial treatment completion (an average of 6 weeks)
(PHQ-9, measure of depression: range 0-27, higher=worse)
after initial treatment completion (an average of 6 weeks)
General Anxiety Disorder-7
Time Frame: after initial treatment completion (an average of 6 weeks)
(PHQ-9, measure of depression: range 0-27, higher=worse)
after initial treatment completion (an average of 6 weeks)
UCLA Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-Reaction Index
Time Frame: after initial treatment completion (an average of 6 weeks)
(UCLA PTSD-RI, measure of TPSD: range 0-51, higher=worse)
after initial treatment completion (an average of 6 weeks)
Composite mental health measure
Time Frame: after initial treatment completion (an average of 6 weeks)
(measure of combined mental health issues: PHQ-9, GAD-7, and UCLA PTSD-RI scores will be standardized to have mean=0, standard deviation=1, and then summed; higher=worse)
after initial treatment completion (an average of 6 weeks)
ART Adherence
Time Frame: after initial treatment completion (an average of 6 weeks), and at 6-months
Self-report - Wilson 3-item scale (range 0-100, higher=better)
after initial treatment completion (an average of 6 weeks), and at 6-months
Viral Load
Time Frame: after initial treatment completion (an average of 6 weeks), and at 6-months
HIV-1 RNA
after initial treatment completion (an average of 6 weeks), and at 6-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Geri Donenberg, PhD, University of Illinois at Chicago
  • Study Chair: Dorothy Dow, MD, MSc, Duke University
  • Principal Investigator: Suad Kapetanovic, MD, University of Southern California

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 11, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IMPAACT 2016
  • DAIDS ID #38506 (Other Identifier: DAIDS/NIAID/NIH)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie results in the publication, after deidentification.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning three months following publication and available throughout period of funding of the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trial (IMPAACT) Network by NIH.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use of the data that is approved by the IMPAACT Network.

Types of Analyses: Specifically for the types of analyses needed to achieve aims in the proposal approved by the IMPAACT Network.

Mechanism: Researchers may submit a request for access to data using the IMPAACT "Data Request" form at: https://www.impaactnetwork.org/resources/study-proposals.htm. Researchers of approved proposals will need to sign an IMPAACT Data Use Agreement before receiving the data.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV-1-infection

Clinical Trials on TI-CBT Intervention Arm

3
Subscribe