High Dose Vitamin C Combined With Metformin in the Treatment of Malignant Tumors

September 26, 2023 updated by: Zhou Fuxiang, Zhongnan Hospital

Clinical Research of High Dose Vitamin C Combined With Metformin in the Treatment of Malignant Tumors

This is an open, prospective, single-arm, multi-cohort clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose vitamin C combined with metformin in the treatment of malignant tumors.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430071
        • Recruiting
        • Zhongnan Hopital of Wuhan University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18 years to 75 years.

  2. Had a disease status that was measurable or evaluable as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, version1.1)： Cohort A: patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who had failed previous standard first-line therapy and could not tolerate or reject existing therapies.

    Cohort B: patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who had previously failed standard first-line therapy, could not tolerate or reject existing therapies.

    Cohort C: patients with advanced gastric cancer who had failed previous standard second-line or above treatment, who could not tolerate or reject existing therapies.

    Cohort D: patients with advanced colorectal cancer who had failed previous standard second-line or above treatment, who could not tolerate or reject existing therapies.

  3. Adequate hepatic, renal, heart, and hematologic functions (hemoglobin ≥80g/L, platelets ≥ 80×10^9/L, neutrophils ≥ 1.5×10^9/L, total bilirubin within 1.5×the upper limit of normal(ULN), ALT and AST≤2.5×the ULN (If liver metastases, serum transaminase≤5×the ULN), serum creatine ≤ 1.5 x ULN, creatinine clearance rate > 50ml/min).
  4. At least 4 weeks after the last anti-tumor treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, biotherapy or endocrine therapy) before enrollment.
  5. Had a life expectancy of at least 3 months.
  6. Had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0, 1, or 2.
  7. Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. In the past or at the same time with other malignant tumors (already cure period of IB or cervical, lower levels of noninvasive basal cell or squamous cell cancer, obtain complete remission (CR) > 10 years of breast cancer, obtain complete remission (CR) > 10 years of malignant melanoma, obtain complete remission (CR) > 5 years except of other malignant tumors).
  2. Pregnant or lactating female patients.
  3. Those who have applied excessive dose of vitamin C or (and) metformin in recent 1 month.
  4. Patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency.
  5. Patients with hydronephrosis.
  6. Had a history of clinically significant or uncontrolled heart disease, including but not limited to: (1)Myocardial infarction. (2)Angina.(3)Congestive heart failure above grade 2 of the New York heart association (NYHA).(4)Ventricular arrhythmias requiring continuous treatment.(5)Supraventricular arrhythmias, including uncontrolled atrial fibrillation.
  7. The patients had mental disorders, and the researchers believed that the patients could not fully or fully understand the possible complications in this study.
  8. Have a history of immunodeficiency, including: HIV positive, or other acquired or congenital immunodeficiency diseases, or a history of organ transplantation.
  9. Those who cannot tolerate or may be allergic to the drugs used in this study.
  10. Participated in clinical trials of other drugs within the past 1 month.
  11. Other factors considered unsuitable for the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Treatment arm
Vitamin C combined with metformin
Drug: Vitamin C
Participants will receive intravenous Vitamin C injection (dose: 1.5g/kg, D1-3, every 2 weeks), treatment termination when the disease progress is confirmed.
Other Names:
  • Ascorbic acid
Drug: Metformin
Participants will orally take metformin 4g daily.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks
Defined as time from first dose of treatment to death from any cause, or even radiological detection/or clinical of disease progression.
up to 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks
Defined as time from first dose of treatment until death.
up to 12 weeks
Objective response rate
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks
Overall Response Rate, as determined by the percentage of patients achieving Partial or Complete response per RECIST 1.1.
up to 12 weeks
Disease control rate
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks
Disease Control Rate: the number of patients with a CR, PR or SD lasting at least 2 months per RECIST 1.1.
up to 12 weeks
Changes of quality of life
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks
Examination of quality of life by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire every 8 weeks.
up to 12 weeks
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v3.0
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks
The number of grade 1-4 and grade 5 (fatal) NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (CTCAE) events during treatment. All patients will be evaluable for toxicity from the time of their first treatment.
up to 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Zhongnan Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Fuxiang Zhou, M.D, Wuhan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 26, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ZNCM

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trials on Vitamin C

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings