The Effect of Application of Proximal and Distal Upper Rehabilitation Robot With Stroke Patients
The Effect of Upper Limb Rehabilitation on the Application of Proximal Upper Rehabilitation Robot and Distal Upper Rehabilitation Robot With Stroke Patients
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 142884
- Recruiting
- National Rehabilitation Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Hemiplegic patients secondary to first cerebrovascular accidents
- Onset ≥ 3 months
- 29 ≤ Fugl-Meyer Assessment score
- Cognitively intact enough to understand and follow the instructions from the investigator
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of surgery of affected upper limb
- Fracture of affected upper limb
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: distal upper rehabilitation robot
experimental group that applied the distal upper rehabilitation robot
|
Intervention with distal upper rehabilitation robot
|
|
Other: proximal upper rehabilitation robot
control group that applied the proximal upper rehabilitation robot
|
Intervention with proximal upper rehabilitation robot
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Wolf motor function test
Time Frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks
|
an activity indicator, has 15 items for testing functional ability
|
change from baseline at 4 weeks
|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Time Frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks
|
indicator of the level of impairment of upper extremity, with higher scores indicating lower impairment
|
change from baseline at 4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Curvature of upper extremity during reaching task
Time Frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
Curvature of the magnetic sensor trajectory (Kinematics of upper extremity during) reaching task
|
baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
|
Jerk of upper extremity during reaching task
Time Frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
Jerk of the magnetic sensor trajectory (Kinematics of upper extremity during) reaching task
|
baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Time Frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
indicator of the level of impairment of upper extremity, with higher scores indicating lower impairment
|
baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
|
Motor activity log
Time Frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
Assesses the use of the paretic arm and hand during activities of daily living in hemiparetic stroke patients.
|
baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
|
Action reach arm test
Time Frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
to assess upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery
|
baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
|
Motor status score
Time Frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
evaluate the impairment level
|
baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
|
Box and block test
Time Frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
measures unilateral gross manual dexterity
|
baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
|
Wolf motor function test
Time Frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
an activity indicator, has 15 items for testing functional ability
|
baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
|
Mean velocity of upper extremity during reaching task
Time Frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
Mean velocity of the magnetic sensor trajectory (Kinematics of upper extremity during) reaching task
|
baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
|
Motor evoked potential over motor cortex of the affected side
Time Frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
Motor evoked potential elicited by noninvasive stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex
|
baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
|
Stroke impact scale 3.0
Time Frame: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
Total score and individual domain score of stroke impact scale
|
baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- NRC-2019-01-001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.