A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Digestive Endoscopy
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Wang J An, Dr
- Phone Number: 057187783759 057187783759
- Email: HREC2013@126.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Cai J Ting, Dr
- Phone Number: 15267019902 15267019902
- Email: 1173920428@qq.com
Study Locations
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310000
- Recruiting
- Cai J Ting
-
Contact:
- Cai J Ting
- Phone Number: 15267019902 15267019902
- Email: 1173920428@qq.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Voluntarily sign the informed consent for this study
- Stable vital signs
- Over 18 years old
- Patients requiring painless gastroenteroscopy for various reasons
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable or unwilling to sign a consent form, or unable to follow research procedures
- have contraindications to painless gastroenteroscopy
- Vital signs are unstable
- The lesions have been identified by gastroenteroscopy in other hospitals, which is to further confirm the patients who come to our hospital for endoscopic examination
- Endoscopic treatment, such as polypectomy, pylorus narrow dilatation and so on
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
A: Model A
Mode A was silent mode, back-to-back with endoscopic physicians to simultaneously display endoscopic images and record video, but did not interfere with the operation of endoscopic physicians.After the operation, the AI model automatically generates an endoscopy report, which is compared with the official report given by the endoscopy doctor in the endoscopy system.
If the difference is large, video verification shall be played back immediately or endoscopic examination shall be performed again before the patient wakes up
|
When the AI model alarms, check carefully to confirm the lesion
|
|
B: Model B
Mode B is a delayed reminder mode.
If the lesion is found during the operation, it is required to be moved to the middle of the visual field within 5 seconds.
If the lesion has been detected by the AI model (the lesion has been circled in the picture), but the doctor does not move the lesion to the middle of the visual field within 5 seconds, the AI system will give an alarm prompt
|
When the AI model alarms, check carefully to confirm the lesion
|
|
C: Model C
Mode C is a real-time reminder mode, which is an alarm prompt when the focus is captured in the visual field.
|
When the AI model alarms, check carefully to confirm the lesion
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes of detection rate of digestive tract lesions assisted by artificial intelligence gastroenteroscopy
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Endoscopic examination has a high dependence on the clinical experience and status of endoscopists, and the quality of endoscopic examination of endoscopists can be reduced by high-load work, and problems such as incomplete examination site coverage, incomplete detection of lesions, and incomplete image collection are easy to occur.
Artificial intelligence does not have this weakness.
It does not reduce its ability to work over a long period of time, and its assistance is expected to improve the detection rate of lesions
|
2 years
|
|
The accuracy of AI-assisted diagnostic model evaluating the intestinal readiness score
Time Frame: 2 years
|
The quality of intestinal preparation determines the quality of colonoscopy, which is evaluated by endoscopists through the Boston score.
The ai-assisted diagnostic model can also be automatically graded.The Boston bowel score is used to determine whether the bowel is adequately prepared.
The Boston bowel score is divided into 4 grades (0~3 points) from worst to cleanest.
The higher the score is, the better the bowel is prepared and more conducive to colonoscopy.
|
2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Cai J Ting, Dr, Second affiliated hospital of school of medicine, zhejiang university
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 研2019-262
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.