Evaluation of Professional Practices in the Treatment of Refractory Idiopathic Overactive Bladder at the Dose of 50 Units (TOX50IUU) (TOX50IUU)

August 30, 2019 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Evaluation of Professional Practices in Botulinum Toxin Type A Intradetrusor Injection, at the Dose of 50 Units for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence by Refractory Idiopathic Overactive Bladder

Considering that the 2013 Hermieu's guidelines differs from the product marketing authorization delivered in November 2014, the primary endpoints is to evaluate life quality by questionnaires at the baseline time, and after two, six and twelve weeks of treatment in patients suffer from urinary incontinence by refractory idiopathic overactive bladder and treated by Botox® at the dose of 50UI (international units)

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Currently, Botox injection is one of the second-line treatments for urinary incontinence by idiopathic overactive bladder. Multiple studies have shown that Botox at the dose of 50UI is effective but not for a long time. Maximum efficiency is about two weeks and until about twelve weeks compared to the dose between 100UI and 300UI that shown an efficiency until twenty-four at thirty-six weeks. But it's not without consequence since the side effects are more numerous increasing the dose. The most frequent are urinary retention with necessary to perform clean intermittent catheterization and urinary infection.

This dose at 50UI is therefore more a test to assess the patient's tolerance to the product, as recommended by the product marketing authorization.

So, through this evaluation of professional practices, investigators would like to evaluate the patient satisfaction treated in hospital, with a first dose at 50UI.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sandrine CAMPAGNE-LOISEAU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Female ≥ 18 yo, suffers from urinary incontinence by idiopathic overactive bladder, inadequately treated by 2 anticholinergic medicines during a period of 3 months for each of them or stopped for intolerance or adverse events

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • Age ≥ 18 yo
  • Refractory idiopathic overactive bladder
  • Eligibility to an injection treatment
  • Capacity to perform clean intermittent catheterization

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Protected adults (under trusteeship, guardianship or judicial protection)
  • Patients under anticholinergics for an other desease (psychiatric, neurologic for example)
  • Known hypersensitivity or at risk of hypersensitivity to botulinum toxin type A like myasthenic syndrom
  • Patients who suffer from an overactive bladder with a known cause (neurological, urological condition)
  • urinary infection under treatment < 48 hours before Botox® injections
  • Suspicious looking bladder requiring biopsies during the cystoscopy
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Language barriers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
female with urinary incontinence
Female ≥ 18 years, suffers from urinary incontinence by idiopathic overactive bladder, inadequately treated by 2 anticholinergic medicines during a period of 3 months for each of them or stopped for intolerance or adverse events
Drug: OnabotulinumtoxinA / Botox®, Allergan Ltd, Irvine, CA, United-States
Botox® intradetrusor injections, with a rigid cystoscope, under local anaesthesia performed by Lidocaïne 2% diluted in 30ml of bicarbonate 14‰. 20 injections of 0,5ml each will be heterogeneously administrated into the bladder wall, sparing the trigone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the life quality by the KHQ (King's Health Questionnaire)
Time Frame: Week 6
Patients will have to answer the questionnaire at home depending the symptoms that they feel at 6 weeks. The data will then be collected by phone
Week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the life quality by the USP (Urinary Symptom Profile) questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 2
Patients will have to answer the questionnaires at home depending the symptoms that they feel. The data will then be collected by phone. The data will then be collected and analysed.
Week 2
Evaluation of the life quality by the USP (Urinary Symptom Profile) questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 12
Patients will have to answer the questionnaires at home depending the symptoms that they feel. The data will then be collected during the postoperative consultation. The data will then be collected and analysed.
Week 12
Evaluation of the life quality by the KHQ (King's Health Questionnaire)
Time Frame: Week 2
Patients will have to answer the questionnaires at home depending the symptoms that they feel. The data will then be collected by phone at 2 weeks. The data will then be collected and analysed
Week 2
Evaluation of the life quality by the KHQ (King's Health Questionnaire)
Time Frame: Week 12
Patients will have to answer the questionnaires at home depending the symptoms that they feel. The data will then be collected during the postoperative consultation. The data will then be collected and analysed
Week 12
Patient experience's evaluation of the local anaesthesia and outpatient care thanks to the EVAN-LR (Evaluation du Vécu de l'ANesthésie Loco-Régionale) questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 1
Patients will have to answer the questionnaire before the return home just after the injection session to assess their experience concerning local anaesthesia and outpatient management.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sandrine CAMPAGNE-LOISEAU, PH, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 26, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 29, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RNI 2019 CAMPAGNE-LOISEAU
  • 2019-A01296-51 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings