Objective Quality of Life Detection Validation

August 10, 2020 updated by: Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc.

DiSCERN Phase I - Objective Quality of Life Detection Validation

The purpose of this research study is to:

  • Collect data to use in the development of a standardized tool for identifying patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who would benefit from advanced therapies (AT) such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and drug pumps.
  • Determine the level to which specific activities reflect with quality of life in individuals with PD.
  • Obtain feedback from individuals with Parkinson's disease and clinicians on the usability of the system.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The investigators aim to develop a standardized tool for identifying patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who would benefit from advanced therapies (AT) and identify when AT recipients are in need of a therapy adjustment. This system will integrate ambulatory PD monitoring with context aware activity detection as the daily activities a patient performs are often the best predictors of quality of life (QoL). In this study the Kinesia 360 system will collect motion data to measure tremor, bradykinesia (slow movement), and dyskinesia (involuntary movements) from individuals with PD to track their symptoms throughout the day. A smartphone will collect information on subject location and activity using the GPS, accelerometers, and microphone within the phone to find correlations between activity and patient wellness. This data will be used to improve detection over time and predict whether patients are candidates for advanced therapies.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44131
        • Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The population is people with Parkinson's Disease in the Northeast Ohio region who have expressed interest in participating in clinical trials

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Able to provide informed consent
  2. Diagnosed with PD
  3. Hoehn and Yahr scale I-III
  4. Able to travel to Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies
  5. Ambulatory and capable of using the Kinesia 360 system
  6. Able to understand and follow instructions regarding using the device

Exclusion Criteria:

Any subject that does not meet the subject selection criteria will be excluded from this study. Children will be excluded from this study due to the fact that they are unlikely to have PD. Subjects that are not capable of functioning independently or are so symptomatic as to compromise their safety will also be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson's Disease patients
Device: Kinesia 360 and Smartphone sensors
Data will be recorded from the Kinesia 360 system and smartphone sensors using the AWARE Framework.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Kinesia Symptom Scores during Daily Wear
Time Frame: Continuous during wear over four days
Kinesia 360 scoring of Parkinson's Disease motor symptoms (tremor, slowness, dyskinesia, gait): The Kinesia 360 system translates recorded motion into 0-4 scores that correlate to rating scales used by clinicians (lower scores are signifiers of better outcomes and higher scores signify worse outcomes). A separate 0-4 score is generated for tremor, slowness, and dyskinesia, and gait is tracked for step count and percent of day walking.
Continuous during wear over four days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
User environment audio activity
Time Frame: Continuous during wear over four days
Using the AWARE Framework, the microphone in the smartphone will be used to measure ambient noise and detect conversation during wear. The output will be detection of conversation and ambient noise level for each recorded timepoint. The time involved in conversation and around active ambient noise will be compared to the symptom scores to measure user involvement in active environments as an impact on Parkinson's disease symptoms.
Continuous during wear over four days
Patient physical activity
Time Frame: Continuous during wear over four days
Using the AWARE Framework, accelerometers in the smartphone will be used to determine the activity of the user. The accelerometers will detect if the phone is being carried (using orientation of gravity) and predict most likely physical activity (using pre-existing activity recognition algorithms). The output will be predicted user activity for each timepoint recorded which will be correlated to Kinesia symptom scores.
Continuous during wear over four days
Patient locations and travel
Time Frame: Continuous during wear over four days
Using the AWARE Framework, Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking in the smartphone will be used to determine the locations and activity of the user. The GPS sensor will be used to track changes in location and determine when an user is at home (primary location), in a secondary location, or in active motion (car, bike, or walking). The outcome will be time spent in each location, percent of day at each location, and time and speed travelling between locations. These outcomes will be correlated to the Kinesia symptom scores and detected physical activity.
Continuous during wear over four days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Dustin Heldman, PhD, Director of research

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 10, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DiSCERN1
  • 1R44MD013767-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings