Objective Quality of Life Detection Validation

August 10, 2020 updated by: Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc.

DiSCERN Phase I - Objective Quality of Life Detection Validation

The purpose of this research study is to:

  • Collect data to use in the development of a standardized tool for identifying patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who would benefit from advanced therapies (AT) such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and drug pumps.
  • Determine the level to which specific activities reflect with quality of life in individuals with PD.
  • Obtain feedback from individuals with Parkinson's disease and clinicians on the usability of the system.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The investigators aim to develop a standardized tool for identifying patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who would benefit from advanced therapies (AT) and identify when AT recipients are in need of a therapy adjustment. This system will integrate ambulatory PD monitoring with context aware activity detection as the daily activities a patient performs are often the best predictors of quality of life (QoL). In this study the Kinesia 360 system will collect motion data to measure tremor, bradykinesia (slow movement), and dyskinesia (involuntary movements) from individuals with PD to track their symptoms throughout the day. A smartphone will collect information on subject location and activity using the GPS, accelerometers, and microphone within the phone to find correlations between activity and patient wellness. This data will be used to improve detection over time and predict whether patients are candidates for advanced therapies.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44131
        • Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The population is people with Parkinson's Disease in the Northeast Ohio region who have expressed interest in participating in clinical trials

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Able to provide informed consent
  2. Diagnosed with PD
  3. Hoehn and Yahr scale I-III
  4. Able to travel to Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies
  5. Ambulatory and capable of using the Kinesia 360 system
  6. Able to understand and follow instructions regarding using the device

Exclusion Criteria:

Any subject that does not meet the subject selection criteria will be excluded from this study. Children will be excluded from this study due to the fact that they are unlikely to have PD. Subjects that are not capable of functioning independently or are so symptomatic as to compromise their safety will also be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson's Disease patients
Data will be recorded from the Kinesia 360 system and smartphone sensors using the AWARE Framework.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Kinesia Symptom Scores during Daily Wear
Time Frame: Continuous during wear over four days
Kinesia 360 scoring of Parkinson's Disease motor symptoms (tremor, slowness, dyskinesia, gait): The Kinesia 360 system translates recorded motion into 0-4 scores that correlate to rating scales used by clinicians (lower scores are signifiers of better outcomes and higher scores signify worse outcomes). A separate 0-4 score is generated for tremor, slowness, and dyskinesia, and gait is tracked for step count and percent of day walking.
Continuous during wear over four days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
User environment audio activity
Time Frame: Continuous during wear over four days
Using the AWARE Framework, the microphone in the smartphone will be used to measure ambient noise and detect conversation during wear. The output will be detection of conversation and ambient noise level for each recorded timepoint. The time involved in conversation and around active ambient noise will be compared to the symptom scores to measure user involvement in active environments as an impact on Parkinson's disease symptoms.
Continuous during wear over four days
Patient physical activity
Time Frame: Continuous during wear over four days
Using the AWARE Framework, accelerometers in the smartphone will be used to determine the activity of the user. The accelerometers will detect if the phone is being carried (using orientation of gravity) and predict most likely physical activity (using pre-existing activity recognition algorithms). The output will be predicted user activity for each timepoint recorded which will be correlated to Kinesia symptom scores.
Continuous during wear over four days
Patient locations and travel
Time Frame: Continuous during wear over four days
Using the AWARE Framework, Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking in the smartphone will be used to determine the locations and activity of the user. The GPS sensor will be used to track changes in location and determine when an user is at home (primary location), in a secondary location, or in active motion (car, bike, or walking). The outcome will be time spent in each location, percent of day at each location, and time and speed travelling between locations. These outcomes will be correlated to the Kinesia symptom scores and detected physical activity.
Continuous during wear over four days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dustin Heldman, PhD, Director of research

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Kinesia 360 and Smartphone sensors

3
Subscribe