Efficacy and Safety of Neo-CRT Followed Surgery Compared With Definitive CRT in Patients With Initial Unresectable ESO

October 29, 2019 updated by: Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital

Efficacy and Safety of Neo-Radiochemotherapy Followed Surgery Compared With Definitive Radiochemotherapy in Patients With Initial Unresectable Esophageal Cancer

Definitive chemoradiotherapy(CRT) has been regarded as a standard of care for patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. Patients who are sensitive to CRT can achieve significantly down staging. Whether this part of patients could benefit from further surgical treatment remains unknown. Herein, a single center prospective randomized phase II clinical trial will be carried out to compare efficacy and safety of definitive CRT versus neo-CRT plus radical resection in patients who achieved down staging after neo-CRT for stage T4NxM0 esophageal Cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

  1. Compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of definitive radiochemotherapy versus(VS) neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy plus radical resection for esophageal cancer patients who down stage from inoperable to operable after neoadjuvant treatment;
  2. Compare the toxic and side effects of definitive radiochemotherapy versus neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy plus radical resection for esophageal cancer patients who achieved clinical complete remission after neoadjuvant treatment;
  3. Assess impact of definitive radiochemotherapy versus neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy plus radical resection on quality of life of patients.

Concurrent Radiochemotherapy: Radiotherapy, Intensity Modulation Radiation Therapy(IMRT), 40Gy; Chemotherapy, Docetaxel （25mg/m2）+Cisplatin (25mg/m2), 1st/8th/15th/22nd day

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Tianjin
      • Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300060
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Thoracic esophageal cancer patients or esophagogastric junction cancer patients, with locally advanced unresectable tumor, clinically identified before treatment as T4bNxM0 or lymph node metastases (LNM)invading adjacent structures according to UICC(International Union Against Cancer) TNM(primary tumor, regional nodes, metastasis) Classification of Malignant Tumours, 8th ed.
  2. Initial unresectable assessed by surgeon.
  3. Patients able to tolerate surgery.
  4. Untreated patients who have not received any antitumor therapy.
  5. Life expectancy > 6 months.
  6. Age: 18-70 years.
  7. White blood cell count ≥4.0×10^9/L, ANC(absolute neutrophil count) ≥1.5×10^9/L, thrombocyte count ≥100×10^9/L, hemoglobin ≥90 g/L; normal liver and kidney functions.
  8. WHO PS(Performance Status): 0-1.
  9. Patients who understood the study and gave signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who have already received antitumor therapy, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery.
  2. Patients with hemorrhage or complicated hemorrhage.
  3. Other uncontrollable patients who are not suitable for surgery.
  4. Patients who deny to accept surgery.
  5. Pregnant or lactating women.
  6. Patients who agree without acknowledgement as a result of psychological, family or social factors.
  7. Patients with CTCAE(Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events Version 4.0) grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy.
  8. Patients who have ever had malignant tumors other than esophageal cancer.
  9. Patients with a history of diabetes for >10 years with unsatisfactory control of blood glucose level.
  10. Patients with serious heart, lung, liver or kidney dysfunction, hematopathy, immune system disease or cachexia who therefore cannot tolerate chemotherapy or surgery.
  11. Patients with severe infection.
  12. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes, random blood glucose > 200mg/L, fasting glucose >140mg/L.
  13. Patients with other severe disease, such as myocardial infarction in the last 6 months.
  14. Patients who participate in other clinical trials right now or in the last 4 weeks.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Definitive Radiochemotherapy

Concurrent Radiochemotherapy:

Radiotherapy,IMRT, 60Gy; Chemotherapy, Docetaxel （25mg/m2）+Cisplatin (25mg/m2) 1st/8th/15th/22nd day.
Radiation: Definitive Radiochemotherapy
Radiotherapy,IMRT, 60Gy; Chemotherapy, Docetaxel （25mg/m2）+Cisplatin (25mg/m2) 1st/8th/15th/22nd day
Procedure: Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy followed by surgery
Concurrent Radiochemotherapy: Radiotherapy,IMRT, 40Gy; Chemotherapy, Docetaxel （25mg/m2）+Cisplatin (25mg/m2) 1st/8th/15th/22nd day; Receive radical surgery 4 to 6 weeks later.
Active Comparator: Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy followed by surgery

Concurrent Radiochemotherapy:

Radiotherapy,IMRT, 40Gy; Chemotherapy, Docetaxel （25mg/m2）+Cisplatin (25mg/m2) 1st/8th/15th/22nd day; Receive radical surgery 4 to 6 weeks later.
Radiation: Definitive Radiochemotherapy
Radiotherapy,IMRT, 60Gy; Chemotherapy, Docetaxel （25mg/m2）+Cisplatin (25mg/m2) 1st/8th/15th/22nd day
Procedure: Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy followed by surgery
Concurrent Radiochemotherapy: Radiotherapy,IMRT, 40Gy; Chemotherapy, Docetaxel （25mg/m2）+Cisplatin (25mg/m2) 1st/8th/15th/22nd day; Receive radical surgery 4 to 6 weeks later.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 5 years
Compare overall survival of definitive radiochemotherapy versus neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy plus radical resection for esophageal cancer patients who achieved clinical complete response after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy
5 years
Disease-free survival
Time Frame: 3 years
Compare progression-free survival of definitive radiochemotherapy versus neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy plus radical resection for esophageal cancer patients who achieved clinical complete response after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment
Time Frame: 5 years
grade 3 or 4 toxicity of leukocytes, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytes, hemoglobin, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, stomatitis, esophagitis, cardiovascular.
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Qingsong Pang, Doctor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 29, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TJESO-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings