A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Salix Probiotic Blend in Participants With Functional Gastrointestinal Disturbances

April 23, 2020 updated by: Bausch Health Americas, Inc.

An Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Salix Probiotic Blend in Subjects With Functional Gastrointestinal Disturbances

The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of Salix Probiotic Blend, administered orally for 30 days, in participants with functional gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
188

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78209
        • Bausch Site 001

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who have symptoms of GI disturbances.
  • Participant has recurrent abdominal pain, discomfort, bloating, and/or abdominal distention associated with a change in the frequency of stool and/or a change in the form (appearance) of stool.
  • Participant is able to understand the nature and purpose of the study and provide informed consent.

  • Sexually active males and sexually active females of child-bearing potential, defined as neither surgically sterile nor post-menopausal (that is, females age >45 years and no menstrual periods for at least 1 year), must agree to use a highly effective method of contraception from Screening to 30 days post last dose of study product. Acceptable forms of contraception include the following:

    • Abstinence
    • Oral, injected, or implanted hormonal methods of contraception
    • Intrauterine device or intrauterine contraceptive system
    • Condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/suppository
    • Female whose last sexual intercourse with males was ≥6 months post-vasectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has active or a history of inflammatory bowel disease.
  • Participant has other significant systemic diseases such as active cancer therapy, active/ongoing infection, uncontrolled diabetes, chronic renal failure, cirrhosis, congestive heart failure, and severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
  • Participant has used antipsychotic medications within 3 months prior to Screening.
  • Participant has used systemic steroids within the month prior to Screening.
  • Participant has suffered from a major psychiatric disorder within the past 2 years.
  • Participant is pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Participant has a known lactose intolerance.
  • Participant is immunocompromised or has an immunodeficiency syndrome of any kind.
  • Participant has undergone any abdominal surgery, except for hernia repair or appendectomy.
  • Participant has had active treatment with prescription medication for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) within 6 weeks prior to Screening.
  • Participant has been diagnosed with infectious gastroenteritis within 1 month prior to Screening.
  • Participant has undergone treatment with probiotics within 6 weeks prior to Screening.
  • Participant is on active treatment with antibiotics.
  • Participant has a known fructose intolerance.
  • Participant is currently on a low fermentable oligo-, di-, mono-saccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet.
  • Participant has a known diagnosis of gastroparesis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Salix Probiotic Blend
Participants will receive a Salix Probiotic Blend capsule orally once a day for 30 days.
Dietary supplement: Salix Probiotic Blend
Oral capsule. The probiotic strains comprise the Salix Probiotic Blend include 3 strains of Bifidobacterium lactis (Bl-04®, Bi-07®, HN019) and 2 strains of lactobacillus (Lactobacillus acidophilus [NCFM]® and Lactobacillus paracasei [Lpc-37]®).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants with a Positive Response to the Product Satisfaction Question
Time Frame: Day 42 (End of Study [EOS] Visit)
Participants will be asked to consider how they felt in the past week in regard to their gastrointestinal well-being and symptoms of abdominal discomfort or pain, bloating, or distension, gas, and altered bowel habit, and to respond to the following overall product satisfaction question: "Compared to the way you felt before beginning the supplement, how strongly do you feel you have had improvement of your overall gastrointestinal well-being?". Responses will be assessed on a Likert 6-point scale. Potential responses will include 1=strongly agree, 2=disagree, 3=slightly disagree, 4=slightly agree, 5=agree, and 6=strongly agree. The percentage of participants with the response of 4=slightly agree, 5=agree, and 6=strongly agree will be reported.
Day 42 (End of Study [EOS] Visit)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measures of Quality of Life Using the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 42 (EOS Visit)
To assess quality of life prior to and post-treatment, participants will be asked to rate 34 quality of life questions from the sub-categories of dysphoria, interference with activity, body image, health worry, food avoidance, social reaction, sexual, and relationship, using the following scale: 1=Not at all; 2=Slightly, 3=Moderately; 4=Quite a bit; 5=Extremely. Lower scores=better IBS-related QoL.
Baseline up to Day 42 (EOS Visit)
Severity of Diarrhea, Constipation, Straining, Urgency, Abdominal Pain/Discomfort, Bloating, and Distention as Measured by the Gastrointestinal (GI) Health Symptom Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 42 (EOS Visit)
Participants will be asked to rate GI symptoms of diarrhea, constipation, straining (difficulty) to move bowels, urgency to move bowels (need to rush to the bathroom to avoid an accident), abdominal pain/discomfort, bloating, and distention (abdominal swelling), using a severity scale where 0 represents "none" and 10 represents "severe".
Baseline up to Day 42 (EOS Visit)
Frequency of GI Symptoms as Measured by the GI Health Symptom Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 42 (EOS Visit)
Participants will be asked to report the number of days per week (that is, never, 1-2 days, 3-4 days, 5-6 days, or 7 days) they experienced the symptoms of diarrhea, constipation, straining (difficulty) to move their bowels, urgency to move their bowels (need to rush to the bathroom to avoid an accident), abdominal pain/discomfort, bloating, distention (abdominal swelling), ability to fully empty bowels, and excessive passage of gas.
Baseline up to Day 42 (EOS Visit)
Satisfaction with Ability to Fully Empty Bowels as Measured by the GI Health Symptom Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 42 (EOS Visit)
Participants will be asked to rate how satisfied they are with the ability to fully empty their bowels on a scale where 0 represents "not satisfied" and 10 represents "very satisfied".
Baseline up to Day 42 (EOS Visit)
Passage of Gas Symptoms as Measured by the GI Health Symptom Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 42 (EOS Visit)
Participants will be asked to rate their excessive passage of gas symptoms on the scale where 0 represents "never" and 10 represents "frequently".
Baseline up to Day 42 (EOS Visit)
Satisfaction with Bowel Habits as Measured by the GI Health Symptom Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 42 (EOS Visit)
Participants will be asked to rate how satisfied they are with their bowel habits on a scale where 0 represents "not satisfied" and 10 represents "very satisfied".
Baseline up to Day 42 (EOS Visit)
Overall Product Satisfaction Evaluation
Time Frame: Day 30
Participants will be asked to respond to the statement "Taking everything into consideration, would you say you are satisfied with this probiotic supplement, overall?" with a response of "Yes", "No", or "Do Not Know".
Day 30
Change From Baseline in Intestinal Fatty-Acid Binding Protein (I-FABP) Levels (Intestinal Integrity Serum Marker) at Day 30
Time Frame: Day 30
Intestinal permeability assessments will be conducted through the evaluation of serum I-FABP levels in a blood sample collected from participants at Baseline and Day 30.
Day 30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 11, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 14, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 14, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 5, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 23, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PBGD1001

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings