A Comparative Study of TECNIS Symfony Plus IOL and a Trifocal IOL

August 4, 2021 updated by: Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc.

A Comparative Clinical Evaluation of a New TECNIS® Presbyopia-correcting Intraocular Lens Against a Trifocal Intraocular Lens

This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, subject- and evaluator-masked, bilateral-implant study conducted at up to 15 sites worldwide. A total of up to 280 subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio for implantation with either the TECNIS Symfony plus IOL Model ZHR00V or the Trifocal IOL. This will ensure that data from at least 100 subjects in the TECNIS Symfony plus lens group and at least 100 subjects in the Trifocal lens group will be available for analysis at the 6-month follow-up timepoint. All subjects will be followed for up to 6 months postoperative.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
205

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • New Zealand
    • Auckland
      • Remuera, Auckland, New Zealand, 1050
        • Auckland Eye Institute
  • Philippines
      • Makati, Philippines, 1200
        • Asian Eye Institute
  • Spain
      • Cordoba, Spain
        • Clinica de Oftalmologia de Cordoba
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Centro Ocular de Alta Technologia Oftalmos
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Miranza IOL Madrid

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

(all criteria apply to both eyes):

  • Age 22 and older
  • Bilateral cataracts or clear crystalline lenses for which posterior chamber IOL implantation has been planned
  • Potential postoperative best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) of 0.66 decimal (20/30 or 6/9 Snellen) or better
  • Predicted postoperative corneal astigmatism less than 1.0 D, including posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA)
  • Clear intraocular media other than cataract in each eye
  • Availability, willingness and sufficient cognitive awareness to comply with examination procedures
  • Ability to understand, read, and write English or the local language in which the informed consent and questionnaires are provided
  • Written informed consent for participation in the study and data protection.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (including device labeling, all criteria apply to both eyes):

    • Require an intraocular lens power outside the available range of +14.0 to +26.0 D
    • Irregular corneal astigmatism (as evaluated by topography)
    • Prior corneal refractive (LASIK, LASEK, RK, PRK, etc.) or intraocular surgery, including prophylactic peripheral iridotomies and peripheral laser retinal repairs
    • Corneal abnormalities such as stromal, epithelial or endothelial dystrophies (e.g., any observed guttata) that are predicted to cause visual acuity loss to a level worse than 0.66 decimal (20/30 or 6/9 Snellen) during the study
    • Inability to achieve keratometric stability for contact lens wearers
    • Recent ocular trauma or ocular surgery that is not resolved/stable or may affect visual outcomes or increase risk to the subject
    • Pupil abnormalities that may affect visual outcomes or increase risk to the subject
    • Subjects with diagnosed degenerative visual disorders (e.g., macular degeneration or other retinal disorders) that are predicted to cause visual acuity loss to a level worse than 0.66 decimal (20/30 or 6/9 Snellen) during the study
    • Subjects with conditions associated with increased risk of zonular rupture, including capsular or zonular abnormalities that may lead to IOL decentration or tilt, such as pseudoexfoliation, trauma, or posterior capsule defects
    • Use of systemic or ocular medications that, in the opinion of the investigator, may affect vision
    • Prior, current, or anticipated use during the 6-month study of tamsulosin or silodosin that may, in the opinion of the investigator, confound the outcome or increase the risk to the subject (e.g., poor dilation or a lack of adequate iris structure to perform standard cataract surgery)
    • Poorly-controlled diabetes or hypertension that, in the opinion of the investigator, may mpact visual outcome or increase the risk to the subject
    • Acute, chronic, or uncontrolled systemic or ocular disease or illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, would increase the operative risk or confound the outcome(s) of the study (e.g., immunocompromised, connective tissue disease, suspected glaucoma, glaucomatous changes in the fundus or visual field, ocular inflammation, etc.). Note: controlled ocular hypertension without glaucomatous changes (optic nerve cupping and visual field loss) is acceptable.

    • Known ocular disease or pathology that, in the opinion of the investigator,

      • may affect visual acuity (e.g., ocular surface conditions)
      • may require surgical intervention during the study (macular degeneration, cystoid macular edema, diabetic retinopathy, uncontrolled glaucoma, etc.)
      • may be expected to require retinal laser treatment or other surgical intervention during the study (macular degeneration, cystoid macular edema, diabetic retinopathy, etc.)
    • Pregnancy, planned pregnancy, presently lactating, or another condition associated with hormonal fluctuation that could lead to refractive changes
    • Concurrent participation or participation within 60 days prior to the preoperative visit in any other clinical trial
    • Desire for monovision correction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Investigational Lens
TECNIS Symfony plus IOL Model ZHR00V
Device: TECNIS Symfony plus IOL Model ZHR00V
IOL replaces the natural lens removed during cataract surgery
Active Comparator: Control Lens
Trifocal Intraocular Lens
Device: Trifocal Intraocular lens
IOL replaces the natural lens removed during cataract surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Binocular distance-corrected VA of 20/25
Time Frame: 3 months
Percent of subjects who achieve binocular distance-corrected VA of 20/25 (6.7.5) Snellen or better at far, intermediate, and near (40 cm)
3 months
Binocular uncorrected VA of 20/32
Time Frame: 3 months
Percent of subjects who achieve binocular uncorrected VA of 20/32 or better at far and near (40 cm)
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 24, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 14, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 14, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 6, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 4, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SUR-IOL-652-3002

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA project site at http://yoda.yale.edu

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings