Evaluation of a Reusable Silicone Hydrogel Multifocal Contact Lens

April 24, 2025 updated by: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.

Clinical Evaluation of a Reusable Multifocal Optical Design in a Presbyopic Population Phase II

This study is a randomized, single-masked, crossover clinical trial. There are two study lenses. Each lens will be dispensed for 3 ± 1 days and then an optimization visit will occur. The final lens pair will be dispensed for 12 ± 2 days and the follow-up on the final lens pair will occur. The second study lenses will then be fit and the above sequence repeated.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
46

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Maitland, Florida, United States, 32751
        • Maitland Vision Center
    • Missouri
      • Raytown, Missouri, United States, 64133
        • Advanced Eyecare
    • Ohio
      • Granville, Ohio, United States, 43023
        • Procare Vision Centers
    • Texas
      • Jacksonville, Texas, United States, 75703
        • Frazier Vision Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Potential subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:

    1. The subject must read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form.
    2. The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
    3. The subject must be at least 40 years of age and not greater than 70 years of age at the time of consent.
    4. Subjects must own a wearable pair of spectacles if required for their distance vision.
    5. The subject must be an adapted soft contact lens wearer in both eyes (i.e. worn lenses a minimum of 2 days per week for at least 8 hours per wear day, for 1 month or more duration).
    6. The subject must either already be wearing a presbyopic contact lens correction (e.g., reading spectacles over contact lenses, multifocal or monovision contact lenses, etc.) or if not respond positively to at least one symptom on the "Presbyopic Symptoms Questionnaire" (Appendix E).
    7. The subject's distance spherical equivalent refraction must be in the range of +1.25 D to +3.75 D in each eye.
    8. The subject's refractive cylinder must be ≤0.75 D in each eye.
    9. The subject's ADD power must be in the range of +0.75 D to +2.50 D.

    10. The subject must have distance best corrected visual acuity of 20/20-3 or better in each eye.

      Exclusion Criteria:

  • Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:

    1. Currently pregnant or lactating.
    2. Any active or ongoing ocular or systemic allergies that may interfere with contact lens wear.
    3. Any active or ongoing systemic disease, autoimmune disease, or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear. This may include, but not be limited to, diabetes, hyperthyroidism, Sjögren's syndrome, xerophthalmia, acne rosacea, Stevens- Johnson syndrome, and immunosuppressive diseases or any infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis).
    4. Any previous, or planned, ocular or intraocular surgery (e.g. radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, lid procedures, cataract surgery, retinal surgery, etc.).
    5. A history of amblyopia, strabismus or binocular vision abnormality.
    6. Use of any of the following medications within 1 week prior to enrollment: oral retinoid isotretinoin (e.g. Accutane), oral tetracyclines, oral phenothiazines, oral/topical/inhaled anticholinergics, systemic/topical corticosteroids.
    7. Use of any ocular medication, with the exception of rewetting drops.
    8. History of herpetic keratitis.
    9. History of irregular cornea.
    10. History of pathological dry eye.
    11. Participation in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 30 days prior to study enrollment.
    12. Employee or immediate family member of an employee of clinical site (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician).
    13. Any known hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to Optifree®Replenish® multipurpose care solution, sodium fluorescein or non-preserved rewetting drop solutions.
    14. Clinically significant (Grade 2 or greater) corneal edema, corneal vascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities or bulbar injection, or any other corneal or ocular abnormalities which would contraindicate contact lens wear.
    15. Entropion, ectropion, extrusions, chalazia, recurrent styes, glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions.
    16. Any current ocular infection or inflammation.
    17. Any current ocular abnormality that may interfere with contact lens wear.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Test/Control
Hyperopic subjects that are habitual soft contact lens wearers and have presbyopia will be randomized to sequence, Test/Control.
Device: JJV Investigational Multifocal Contact Lens
TEST
Device: 1-Day Acuvue® Moist Brand Multifocal Contact Lens
CONTROL
Experimental: Control/Test
Hyperopic subjects that are habitual soft contact lens wearers and have presbyopia will be randomized to sequence, Control/Test.
Device: JJV Investigational Multifocal Contact Lens
TEST
Device: 1-Day Acuvue® Moist Brand Multifocal Contact Lens
CONTROL

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Binocular Contact Lens-Corrected Visual Performance Under Standard High Contrast Bright
Time Frame: 2-Week Follow-up
The contact lens-corrected visual performance on logMAR scale was evaluated binocularly under high luminance high contrast, dim luminance high contrast and high luminance low contrast conditions at 4 meters (distance), 64 cm (intermediate) and 40 cm (near) using ETDRS/reduced Guillon-Poling charts. A value of 0.0 logMAR equates to 20/20 vision on a Snellen Scale. Lower values indicate better visual performance. The average visual performance was reported for each lens type and distance.
2-Week Follow-up
Binocular Contact Lens-Corrected Visual Performance Under Standard High Contrast Dim With Goggles
Time Frame: 2-Week Follow-up
The contact lens-corrected visual performance on logMAR scale was evaluated binocularly under high luminance high contrast, dim luminance high contrast and high luminance low contrast conditions at 4 meters (distance), 64 cm (intermediate) and 40 cm (near) using ETDRS/reduced Guillon-Poling charts. A value of 0.0 logMAR equates to 20/20 vision on a Snellen Scale. Lower values indicate better visual performance. The average visual performance was reported for each lens type and distance.
2-Week Follow-up
Binocular Contact Lens-Corrected Visual Performance Under Standard Low Contrast Bright
Time Frame: 2-Week Follow-up
The contact lens-corrected visual performance on logMAR scale was evaluated binocularly under high luminance high contrast, dim luminance high contrast and high luminance low contrast conditions at 4 meters (distance), 64 cm (intermediate) and 40 cm (near) using ETDRS/reduced Guillon-Poling charts. A value of 0.0 logMAR equates to 20/20 vision on a Snellen Scale. Lower values indicate better visual performance. The average visual performance was reported for each lens type and distance.
2-Week Follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Vision Scores
Time Frame: 2-Week Follow-up
Overall vision scores were assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, aged 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
2-Week Follow-up
Overall Comfort Scores
Time Frame: 2-Week Follow-up
Overall comfort scores were assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, aged 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
2-Week Follow-up
Number of Grade 3 or Higher Slit Lamp Findings
Time Frame: 2-Week Follow-up
Slit Lamp Findings (SLF) were assessed using a biomicroscope and was graded using the FDA grading scale (Grade: 0, 1,2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of findings and 1 to 4 representing successively worse findings (i.e. Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). Slit Lamp Findings were assessed at the 2-Week Follow-up. SLF is a binary response where Y=1 for at least one Grade 3 or 4 slit lamp finding. The number of eyes with SLF with grade 3 or higher by lens was reported.
2-Week Follow-up
Proportion of Subjects That Reported Ocular Symptoms
Time Frame: 2-Week Follow-up
Subject reported ocular symptoms were assessed using a questionnaire at the 2-week follow-up. Subjects were asked if they experienced any of the following symptoms: Burning/Stinging, Itchiness/Scratchiness, Dryness, Lens Awareness, Grittiness/Foreign Body Sensation, Redness, Irritation/Discomfort, Cloudy/Blurry/Hazy, Variable Vision and Other; using the scale of: None, Mild, Moderate and Severe. The proportion of subjects that reported symptoms (Mild, Moderate and Severe) was reported for each lens type.
2-Week Follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 24, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR-6372

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Johnson & Johnson Medical Device Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings