Functional Decline and QoL in People Aging with HIV in Asia

February 10, 2025 updated by: Shui-Shan Lee, MD, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Functional Decline and Quality of Life in People Aging with HIV in Asia

This is a multi-center prospective cross-sectional study to determine the burden of decline in intrinsic capacity and functional ability, and the prevalence of geriatric syndromes, such as frailty, and disability in adult people living with HIV (PLWH) in Asia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

This research project is expected to have the following clinical impact

  1. To understand the impact of impaired functional status in PLWH in Asia would be important to determine the long-term health burden needs in this aging population in this part of the world.
  2. The identification of risk factors associated with impaired functional status would be important to guide clinical decisions in patient management, such as the choice of anti-retroviral regimen, and screening of and early intervention for modifiable risk factors. These are of paramount importance in the promotion of healthy aging in this population.
  3. This proposed cross-sectional study lays the foundation for the establishment of a longitudinal cohort for long-term follow up of people aging with HIV in Asia, with the objectives of evaluating the long-term impact of aging on clinical outcomes and functional status in PLWH in this region.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Prince of Wales Hospital
      • Sha Tin, Hong Kong
        • Prince of Wales Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All PLWH followed up at the five participating HIV centers will be screened and invited to participate in this study. Each site will also enroll age and sex-matched HIV-uninfected participants in a 1:2 ratio.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV antibody positive
  • Age 35 years or above
  • Asian ethnicity, including but not limited to Chinese, Malay and Indian

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability or refusal to consent
  • Active infections requiring in-hospital treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
PLWH
PLWH followed up at the five participating HIV centers
HIV-uninfected individuals
Age and sex-matched HIV-uninfected individuals

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional disability
Time Frame: 24 months
Functional disability is defined as any difficulty in any of the six areas of functioning in daily life as assessed by WHO DAS II questionnaire
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite score for intrinsic capacity
Time Frame: 24 months
The score is based on (i) self-reported questions assessing the subjects' eight health domains, including mobility, self-care, cognition, interpersonal activities, vision, pain and discomfort, sleep and energy, and affect, and (ii) measures of grip strength, short physical performance battery and cognitive function
24 months
Physical performance
Time Frame: 24 months
Physical performance is measured by six-metre usual gait speed. Low physical performance is defined as usual gait speed ≤0.8 m/s
24 months
Cognitive decline
Time Frame: 24 months
Cognitive decline is defined as presence of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) according to "Frascati Criteria". Asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI) involves impairment of cognitive functioning in at least two ability domains, in the absence of interference in everyday functioning. Mild neurocognitive disorder (MND) also involves impairment in at least two ability domains, with at least mild interference in daily functioning. HIV-associated dementia (HAD) requires marked impairment in cognitive functioning in at least two ability domains, in the presence of marked impairment in day-to-day functioning
24 months
Frailty
Time Frame: 24 months
Frailty is measured using the frailty index
24 months
Sarcopenia
Time Frame: 24 months
Sarcopenia is defined as height-adjusted skeletal muscle mass <7.0 kg/m2 in men and 5.7 kg/m2 in women using BIA
24 months
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 24 months
Health-related quality of life will be assessed as measured by WHO HIV BREF QOL.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chinese University of Hong Kong

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Malaya
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
National Taiwan University
Chongqing Public Health Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Grace LUI, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 31, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 10, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Geri_HIV_protocol_v4_26Nov2019

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings