Comparison of Articaine and Prilocaine for Extraction of Maxillary Teeth
Does Articaine, Rather Than Prilocaine, Increase the Success Rate of Anaesthesia for Extraction of Maxillary Teeth
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Medina, Saudi Arabia, 41311
- Taibah University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients have one or two upper teeth for extraction, subject tooth or its adjacent must be vital, healthy patient or patient with mild systemic diseases (class I or II according to American Society of Anesthesiology).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients excluded from this study if they have allergy to local anaesthetic agents or need surgical, or multiple teeth extraction.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Articaine 4% with 1:00.000 Adrenaline
if the patient was in articaine group, buccal infiltration technique was applied by inserting a short needle at the height of buccal sulcus along the long axis of the subject tooth for extraction.
|
Articaine 4% is dental local anaesthetic agent
adrenaline is a vasoconstrictor
|
|
Active Comparator: Prilocaine with 3% Felypressin (0.03 I.U. per ml)
if the patient was in prelocaine group, buccal infiltration technique was applied by inserting a short needle at the height of buccal sulcus along the long axis of the subject tooth for extraction.
|
prilocaine is dental local anaesthetic agent
Felypressin is a vasoconstrictor
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Does articaine, rather than prilocaine, increase the success rate of anaesthesia for extraction of maxillary teeth
Time Frame: 6 months
|
to compare the anaesthetic performances of 3% prilocaine (the safest local anaesthetic) with 4 % articaine (the local anaesthetic with fastest onset time of action) when used for maxillary teeth extraction
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Taibah dental College
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Study Protocol
- Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
- Clinical Study Report (CSR)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.