Preoperative Systemic Therapy vs Upfront Surgery in HER2 Positive Early Breast Cancer

September 23, 2020 updated by: YU Xingfei, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital

Preoperative Systemic Therapy Versus Upfront Surgery in HER2 Positive Early Breast Cancer: a Prospective Nested Case-control Study in Real World

Preoperative systemic treatment can make patients getting more opportunity for breast-conserving surgery, down-staging and new drugs developing. It is particularly common in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-over expressing subtype for as high as 40%~60% pCR rate of such a population. Even though, in NSABP B18/27 trials, it had been proved that PST could not improve either disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) comparing with postoperatively systemic treatment in total population. We designed a real-world study to investigate the prognosis of anti-HER2 treatment combined with chemotherapy preoperatively versus postoperatively in HER2-positive early breast cancer

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with a diagnosis of HER2 positive early invasive breast cancer (cT1-3N0-1M0), from January 2012 to December 2014 were identified and enrolled continuously. The conditions of HER2-positive expression of primary breast cancer were defined as follows: HER2 3+ by immunohistochemical (IHC) method or HER2 2+ by IHC with a further positive result by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). According to the real upfront treatment, all eligible patients were classified as PST group and surgery group. All the patients accepted standard one-year trastuzumab as anti-HER2 treatment combined with chemotherapy. In the PST group, the effect was evaluated according to RECIST1.1 every two cycles, the patients with clinical complete response (cCR) or partial response (PR) would receive the whole course of chemotherapy, those with stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) would receive surgery promptly. After surgery, all patients underwent irradiation and endocrine therapies if necessary. The pCR was defined as the absence of infiltrating residual invasive disease in the breast and axillary nodes. For those non-pCR patients after PST, intensive adjuvant chemotherapy was not routine treatment except patients with progressive disease.The primary endpoint was DFS defined as the time from enrollment to local, regional, or distant recurrences; the occurrence of contralateral breast cancer; or death without evidence of breast cancer. Patients suffered disease progress becoming inoperable before surgery were counted as local treatment failures. The second endpoint was OS defined as the time from study entry to death from any cause. All the endpoints were compared between PST group and upfront surgery group, also further analysis according to pathological response status stratified in PST group.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1067

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

HER2 positive early invasive breast cancer, using trastuzumab for one year both in neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. HER2 positive
  2. early invasive breast cancer (cT1-3N0-1M0)
  3. using one-year trastuzumab as anti-HER2 treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Exclude metastasis and recurrent breast cancer
  2. using trastuzumab less than a year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
PST
patient accepts preoperative systemic treatment as upfront strategy
Procedure: Preoperative systemic treatment
neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with trastuzumab as preoperative systemic treatment
Other Names:
  • neoadjuvant treatment
upfront surgery
patient accepts upfront surgery and run postoperative systemic treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease free survival
Time Frame: 5 years
as the time from enrollment to local, regional, or distant recurrences; the occurrence of contralateral breast cancer; or death without evidence of breast cancer
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 5 years
the time from study entry to death from any cause
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 29, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 31, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 23, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HER2-RWSNeo

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to make individual participant data available to others

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings