Insulin Resistance in Multiple System Atrophy (IRAMS)

July 18, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux
Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a rare and fatal neurodegenerative disorder. The pathologic hallmark is the accumulation of aggregated alpha-synuclein in oligodendrocytes forming glial cytoplasmic inclusions. Some symptomatic treatments are available while disease-modification remains an unmet treatment need. Post-mortem findings suggest insulin resistance, i.e. reduced insulin signaling, in the brains of MSA patients. The aim of this study is to complete the target validation of insulin resistance for future treatment trials.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Multiple system atrophy (MSA) patients have a poor prognosis with a median survival ranging between 6 and 10 years. MSA belongs to the synucleinopathies, which are characterized by the abnormal accumulation of alpha-synuclein. We have recently shown brain insulin resistance (i.e. reduced insulin signaling) in post-mortem brain tissue of MSA patients and transgenic MSA mice, as illustrated by increased protein levels of insulin receptor substrate-1 phosphorylated at serine 312 (IRS-1pS312). Additionally, exendin-4, an approved anti-diabetic drug targeting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptors, was capable of decreasing brain levels of IRS-1pS312 and preserving dopamine neurons in transgenic MSA mice. We further observed an inverse correlation between plasma neural-derived exosomal IRS-1pS312 levels and survival of dopamine neurons in transgenic MSA mice.

The aim of this study is to further characterize peripheral and central insulin resistance in MSA patients, thereby validating this target for future treatment trials. For this purpose, fasting blood glucose and insulin levels will be determined in samples of MSA patients and healthy controls for a homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA). Additionally, IRS-1pS312 will be measured in neural-derived plasma exosomes of MSA patients and healthy controls.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
124

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients :

  • Patients suffering from "possible" or "probable" MSA according to clinical consensus criteria (Gilman et al., 2008).
  • Age > 30
  • Written informed consent
  • Patient covered by the national health system

Controls:

  • Patients not suffering from a neurologic disorder
  • Age > 30
  • Written informed consent
  • Patient covered by the national health system

Exclusion Criteria:

For patients and controls:

  • Presence of a diabetes
  • Treatment with corticosteroids, estrogen, atypical antipsychotics, and anti-retroviral agents
  • Patient under tutelage
  • Patient unable to give consent
  • Any other neurologic disorder
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding
  • MOCA ≤21
  • Contraindication to perform an MRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: MSA patient
Patients will be recruited at the French Reference Center for MSA.
Biological: Homeostasis Model Assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA)
Fasting blood sample for : glucose, insulinemia, hemoglobin and lipid test to determine the Homeostasis Model Assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA) index
Behavioral: MOntreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Cognitive evaluation with MOntreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Behavioral: Clinical characteristics of AMS patients
Severity and progression of motor disorders assessed by the UMSARS scale, severity of dysautonomia assessed by the COMPASS31 scale ; quality of life questionnaire (AMS-Qol) for the level of difficulty experienced by the patient (on activities such as : move; walk; maintain balance; talk; feed)
Procedure: Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) : putamen imaging, bridge and cerebellum; white substance hypersignals volume
Biological: Blood sampling
Optional blood sampling for the constitution of a biological collection
Other: Control
Healthy volunteer matched for age (+/- 5years) and sex with MSA patient.
Biological: Homeostasis Model Assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA)
Fasting blood sample for : glucose, insulinemia, hemoglobin and lipid test to determine the Homeostasis Model Assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA) index
Behavioral: MOntreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Cognitive evaluation with MOntreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Procedure: Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) : putamen imaging, bridge and cerebellum; white substance hypersignals volume
Biological: Blood sampling
Optional blood sampling for the constitution of a biological collection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HOMA Index
Time Frame: Day 0
Homeostasis Model Assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA) index, calculated from a fasted blood glucose and insulin level between AMS patients and a formula-controlled group (insulinemia x glycemia)/22.5 insulinemia being expressed in mU/l and glucose in mmol/L.
Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IRS-1pS312 (Insulin Receptor Substrate-1, Phosphorylated at Serine 312) concentration
Time Frame: Day 0
Mean concentration of neuronal IRS-1pS312 in plasma exosomes
Day 0
Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) score
Time Frame: Day 0

UMSARS I (0=no disorder, 48=severe disorders): is an evaluation of activities of daily life via 12 items. It evaluates language, writing, autonomy (diet; dressing; hygiene), walking and the presence of possible urinary, sexual or intestinal disorders.

UMSARS II (0=no disorder, 56=severe disorders): consists of a motor examination on the basis of 14 items that allow to evaluate including facial expression, oculomotricity, oral expression, tremors or walking.

UMSARS III: consists of measurements of blood pressure and heart rate in the lying and standing position for 10 minutes every minute.

UMSARS IV : disability assessment from 1 to 5 (1= completely independent; 5 = totally dependent / dependent)
Day 0
Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) score
Time Frame: One year

UMSARS I (0=no disorder, 48=severe disorders): is an evaluation of activities of daily life via 12 items. It evaluates language, writing, autonomy (diet; dressing; hygiene), walking and the presence of possible urinary, sexual or intestinal disorders.

UMSARS II (0=no disorder, 56=severe disorders): consists of a motor examination on the basis of 14 items that allow to evaluate including facial expression, oculomotricity, oral expression, tremors or walking.

UMSARS III: consists of measurements of blood pressure and heart rate in the lying and standing position for 10 minutes every minute.

UMSARS IV : disability assessment from 1 to 5 (1= completely independent; 5 = totally dependent / dependent)
One year
COMPosite Autonomic Symptoms Score (COMPASS-31)
Time Frame: Day 0
Assessment of dysautonomia. The scale consists of 31 items in 6 domains and provides an autonomic symptom score from 0 to 100. High values represent severe symptoms
Day 0
COMPosite Autonomic Symptoms Score (COMPASS-31)
Time Frame: One year
Assessment of dysautonomia. The scale consists of 31 items in 6 domains and provides an autonomic symptom score from 0 to 100. High values represent severe symptoms
One year
AMS-Qol - Quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 0
Quality of life questionnaire to collect the level of difficulty experienced by the patient (from no problem to extreme problem) during the 4 weeks preceding the interview on activities such as : move; walk; maintain balance; talk; feed. It also assesses how the patient feels about his disease
Day 0
AMS-Qol - Quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: One year
Quality of life questionnaire to collect the level of difficulty experienced by the patient (from no problem to extreme problem) during the 4 weeks preceding the interview on activities such as : move; walk; maintain balance; talk; feed. It also assesses how the patient feels about his disease
One year
MOntreal Cognitive Assessment (Moca) score
Time Frame: Day 0
Moca evaluates short-term memory, visual spatial skills, executive functions, attention, concentration, working memory, language, abstraction abilities, computing and orientation in time and space. Cognitive impairment is assessed on the score of 30 points (27-30: no cognitive impairment; 21-26: mild)
Day 0
MOntreal Cognitive Assessment (Moca) score
Time Frame: One year
Moca evaluates short-term memory, visual spatial skills, executive functions, attention, concentration, working memory, language, abstraction abilities, computing and orientation in time and space. Cognitive impairment is assessed on the score of 30 points (27-30: no cognitive impairment; 21-26: mild)
One year
Brain MRI volume
Time Frame: Day 0
Imaging data (severity and progression of putamen atrophy, bridge and cerebellum in mm3; magnitude and progression of white substance hypersignals on T2-FLAIR images in mm3
Day 0
Brain MRI volume
Time Frame: One year
Imaging data (severity and progression of putamen atrophy, bridge and cerebellum in mm3; magnitude and progression of white substance hypersignals on T2-FLAIR images in mm3
One year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Bordeaux

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Bordeaux
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France
Labex Brain

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 28, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 28, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 28, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 31, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 18, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CHUBX 2018/30

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings