Defining Core Outcome Sets in Trigeminal Neuralgia (TRINCOS)

February 3, 2022 updated by: University College, London
The aim of this study is to determine what patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN), clinicians and researchers in the field, consider to be the most important outcomes to be expected after undergoing treatment for trigeminal neuralgia and how this could be measured in all studies relating to this condition. This would enable different treatments to be compared using the same standards.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN) is a rare chronic condition that causes agonizing, unpredictable, short-lasting electric shock-like one-sided facial pain and is commonly provoked by triggers such as light touch. This debilitating chronic pain disorder has a significant impact on the quality of life of patients with increased risk of depression and suicide. The current varied outcome measures make it difficult for patients to make decisions about choice of treatments which was highlighted in a study among 156 United Kingdom (UK) patients with TN who completed an adapted time-trade - off utility measure to ascertain how they valued the potential outcomes from various surgical and medical treatments.

Patients can be managed with a range of anticonvulsants or by several types of neurosurgical interventions. To successfully compare the effectiveness and tolerability of various treatment options data is needed from well designed and conducted randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohorts which use the same outcome measures. Apart from pain relief only a handful of other outcome measures have been used. It has to date not been possible to compare medical versus neurosurgical treatments and yet this is one of the most frequently asked patient questions. The impact of complications on ability to return to normal activities and improvement in mental health needs to be determined. The development and implementation of Core Outcome Sets (COS) and measures in clinical practice across the UK and in future trials would allow standardised outcome data, thereby facilitating meta-analysis and thus clinical decision-making.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who have been diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia and are currently receiving treatment (medical or surgical). Clinicians and researchers working in the field.

Description

Inclusion Criteria for the focus groups:

  • Adult patients (>18ys) diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia
  • Willing to attend a focus group meeting
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Undergoing management for trigeminal neuralgia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to attend a focus group meeting
  • Insufficient English to take part in a group discussion
  • Unable to take part in discussions

Inclusion Criteria for the Delphi survey:

  • Adult patients (>18ys) diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia

  • Clinicians working in the field of Trigeminal Neuralgia

    • Researchers working in the field of Trigeminal Neuralgia
    • Willing to complete a 3 round Delphi survey
  • Able to give informed consent

Inclusion Criteria for the online consensus meeting:

  • Adult patients (>18ys) diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia

  • Clinicians working in the field of Trigeminal Neuralgia

    • Researchers working in the field of Trigeminal Neuralgia
    • Able to join an online meeting
    • Have internet access
    • Willing to participate in a discussion with others about the important treatment outcomes in Trigeminal Neuralgia
  • Able to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Focus Group
Qualitative research done with a group of patients with TN. Patients will describe their experience of living with the disease and what outcomes of treatment they consider to be important.
Other: Observational
Observational
Delphi survey
Group of relevant stakeholders - patients, clinicians and researchers will rate the outcomes of treatment in a 3 round Delphi survey.
Other: Observational
Observational
Consensus meeting
Group of relevant stakeholders - patients, clinicians and researchers will rate the outcomes of treatment and finalise the COS for Trigeminal Neuralgia.
Other: Observational
Observational

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Define the trigeminal neuralgia core outcome set
Time Frame: 2020-2022
2020-2022

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Identify the instruments to use in the core outcome set
Time Frame: 2020-2022
2020-2022

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University College, London

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Rosetrees Trust

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Joanna Zakrzweska, Professor, University College, London

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 2, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 3, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 17/0901

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trigeminal Neuralgia

Clinical Trials on Observational

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings