Neuromodulation for Enhancement of Emotion Regulation in Bipolar Mood Disorders

March 2, 2026 updated by: Kristen K. Ellard, Ph.D., Massachusetts General Hospital
The investigators are conducting this research study to better understand how individuals with bipolar disorder regulate their emotions, and if transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can help improve emotion regulation for individuals with bipolar mood disorders.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The objective of this study protocol is to test whether intermittent theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTBS-TMS) to ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) or inferior parietal lobule (IPL) can improve performance on emotion regulation tasks in patients with bipolar disorder. Results from this study will help inform future treatment development to improve emotion regulation in patients with bipolar disorder. The study will proceed in two phases: During Phase 1, a cohort of 30 healthy control subjects will be recruited in order to establish a normative sample from which to compare patient data. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data will be collected from healthy control participants during performance on two emotion regulation tasks (probing implicit and explicit emotion regulation). Data from these subjects will provide a normative distribution of VLPFC and IPL function from which to compare individual patients. During Phase 2, a cohort of 30 patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder will be recruited. Patient participants will perform the same two emotion regulation tasks during fMRI scanning. Data from individual patients will be analyzed to detect specific VLPFC and IPL subregions showing activation deviations from healthy controls (Phase 1 data). Patient-specific VLPFC and IPL subregions showing patterns of activation greater than two standard deviations from healthy controls will be used as individualized target sites for TMS stimulation. Patients will then receive high-dose iTBS-TMS (1800 pulses) of the VLPFC and IPL, and sham iTBS-TMS to the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) across three separate study visits. Order of target stimulation will be randomized across participants. TMS sessions will take approximately 10 minutes and will be immediately followed by an fMRI scanning session, during which participants will again complete the implicit and explicit emotion regulation tasks. TMS sessions will take place in the scanning bay to enable quick transition to the fMRI task. Baseline scanning sessions and either active TMS-fMRI or sham TMS-fMRI sessions will occur on separate days, no more than two weeks apart. Effects of iTBS-TMS on emotion regulation will be evaluated by comparing pre-TMS versus post-TMS behavior, neural activation, and functional connectivity patterns during performance on implicit and explicit emotion regulation tasks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
56

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
        • Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria (Healthy Controls)

  1. Male or female age 18-55
  2. No history of psychiatric disorder, as assessed using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI).
  3. Non-Clinical Levels of Emotion Dysregulation, as assessed using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) Non-clinical levels of emotion dysregulation will be defined as a score < 80 on the DERS.

Exclusion Criteria (Healthy Controls)

  1. Current or history of psychiatric disorders
  2. Endorsement of clinical levels of emotion dysregulation
  3. Current or history of: organic mental disorder; substance abuse within the past 12 months and/or history of substance abuse for > 1 year; past or current substance dependence (including alcohol); schizophrenia; delusional disorder; and psychotic disorders.
  4. Current pregnancy.
  5. Medical illness or non-psychiatric medical treatment that would likely interfere with study participation
  6. Neurologic disorder, prior neurosurgical procedure, prior electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or TMS, history of seizures or head trauma.
  7. Presence of metallic implants that would interfere with safety during fMRI scanning.

Inclusion Criteria (Bipolar Disorder Group)

  1. Male or female age 18-55
  2. Diagnosis of Bipolar I Disorder (BD-I), as assessed through MINI.

  3. Current mood state euthymic.

    a. Hamilton-Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) will be used to assess current depressive and manic symptoms. Euthymia will be defined as a HAM-D-17 score <10 and YMRS score <12.

  4. Clinical Levels of Emotion Dysregulation, as assessed using the DERS. Clinical levels of emotion dysregulation will be defined as a score > 80 on the DERS.

Exclusion Criteria (Bipolar Disorder Group)

  1. Current symptoms of mania or depression (YMRS score >12, HAM-D-17 score >10).
  2. Medication instability (<3 months).
  3. Current or history of: organic mental disorder; substance abuse within the past 12 months and/or history of substance abuse for > 1 year; past or current substance dependence (including alcohol), verified by urine toxicology screen; schizophrenia; delusional disorder; and psychotic disorders.
  4. Current pregnancy.
  5. Medical illness or non-psychiatric medical treatment that would likely interfere with study participation
  6. Neurologic disorder, prior neurosurgical procedure, prior ECT or TMS, history of seizures or head trauma.
  7. Presence of metallic implants that would interfere with safety during fMRI scanning.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Healthy Control
This group consists of individuals with no psychiatric diagnosis.
Experimental: Bipolar Group
This group consists of individuals with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder who have been randomized to receive high-dose TMS (i.e., 1800 pulses) and sham TMS.
Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
TMS is a non-invasive tool for modulating patterns of brain activation and circuit connectivity. It uses electromagnetic pulses to induce electric currents over the cortex that serve to depolarize or hyperpolarize neurons, thereby changing patterns of synaptic activity. This study will use intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), an efficient TMS protocol that uses high frequency (50Hz) triplets of TMS given every 200 milliseconds (i.e. at 5 Hz).
Other Names:
  • TMS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Multisource Interference Task with International Affective Pictures Set (MSIT-IAPS)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Post-TMS Stimulation (30 min-1 hour)
The MSIT-IAPS task is a well-validated fMRI task designed to assess the effects of emotional distractors on cognitive control. During each trial, a three-digit number is presented. Each set contains two identical distractor numbers and a target number that differed from the distractors. Participants report via a button press the identity of the target number that differs from the two distractor numbers. Noninterference (control) trials: distractor numbers are always zeros, and the identity of the target number always corresponds to its position on the button response pad (100, 020, 003). Interference trials: distractor numbers are always numbers other than 0, and the identity of the target number is always incongruent with its position on the button response pad (e.g. 211, 232, 331, etc.). Each trial of the MSIT is overlaid on a negative, positive, or neutral IAPS image. Reaction time (ms) and accuracy (% correct) is calculated for each trial.
Change from Baseline to Post-TMS Stimulation (30 min-1 hour)
Emotion Conflict Resolution Task
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Post-TMS Stimulation (30 min-1 hour)
The ECR task is a well-validated task designed to assess the effects of emotional conflict that arises from the incompatibility between task-relevant and task-irrelevant emotional dimensions of a stimulus. Faces with fearful and happy expressions are presented with the words "happy" or "fear" written across them. Words are either congruent (e.g. "happy" written across an image with a happy expression) or incongruent (e.g. "happy" written across an image with a fearful expression). Subjects are asked to identify the emotional expression of the face while ignoring the word. Trials are analyzed with regard to immediately preceding trials: incongruent trials preceded by congruent trials (CI trials) measure emotion conflict, and incongruent trials preceded by incongruent trials (II trials) measure resolution of emotion conflict. Reaction time (ms) and accuracy (% correct) is calculated for each trial.
Change from Baseline to Post-TMS Stimulation (30 min-1 hour)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MSIT-IAPS Task-induced blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Post-TMS Stimulation (30 min-1 hour)
Task-dependent linear time course (ß-value) of BOLD signal during performance of MSIT-IAPS task. Differences in ß-values during relevant task conditions (CI versus II) are compared.
Change from Baseline to Post-TMS Stimulation (30 min-1 hour)
MSIT-IAPS Task-induced blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal functional connectivity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Post-TMS Stimulation (30 min-1 hour)
Task-dependent BOLD signal correlation strengths (z-transformed values) during performance of the task. Differences in z-transformed values during relevant task conditions (CI versus II) are compared.
Change from Baseline to Post-TMS Stimulation (30 min-1 hour)
ECR Task-induced blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Post-TMS Stimulation (30 min-1 hour)
Task-dependent linear time course (ß-value) of BOLD signal during performance of the Cognitive Reappraisal task. Differences in ß-values during relevant task conditions (Reappraise versus Attend) are compared.
Change from Baseline to Post-TMS Stimulation (30 min-1 hour)
ECR Task-induced blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal functional connectivity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Post-TMS Stimulation (30 min-1 hour)
Task-dependent BOLD signal correlation strengths (z-transformed values) during performance of the Cognitive Reappraisal task. Differences in ztransformed values during relevant task conditions (Reappraise versus Attend) are compared.
Change from Baseline to Post-TMS Stimulation (30 min-1 hour)
Skin Conductance Response
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Post-TMS Stimulation (30 min-1 hour)
Skin conductance response is measured by recording electrodermal skin response using electrode sensors applied to fingertips. Correlation between changes in skin conductance response and changes in task performance (RT, distress ratings) are examined as a task manipulation check.
Change from Baseline to Post-TMS Stimulation (30 min-1 hour)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Massachusetts General Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kristen Ellard, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 25, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 2, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2020P000120

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings