Clinical Cross Reactions Between Anacardiaceae (Cross-Anacards)
Evaluating the Correlation Between the Results of the Allergy Work-up for Different Allergens of the Anacardiaceae Family
The prevalence of food allergies has increased in recent decades, ranging from 1 to 3% of the general population. According to international literature and French national surveys, nuts today represent a group of allergens often associated with severe allergic reactions. They are responsible for 18 to 40% of deaths from food-related anaphylaxis.
Among all nuts, the prevalence of anacardiac allergies (mainly cashew and pistachio) continues to increase and has become a growing public health problem. Today, global production is estimated at 4.9 million tonnes of cashews and 1.1 million tonnes of pistachios. The resulting increased exposure may explain the increased prevalence of allergic reactions reported to these fruits. In addition, anaphylactic reactions to anacardiaceae are reported to be even more severe than those occurring in subjects allergic to peanuts.
Cashews and pistachios are known to exhibit immunological cross-reactions with one another. In fact, they have a strong sequential homology between their storage allergens Ana o 1 / Pis v 3 (7S vicilin, 78% homology); Ana o 2 / Pis v 2 (legume 11S, 80% homology) and Ana o 3 / Pis v 1 (albumin 2S, 70% homology). For this reason, some authors talk about the cashew / pistachio syndrome and associate the two allergenic sources by considering them as one, in clinical practice.
The diagnosis of allergy to nuts, and therefore to anacardiaceae, is based on a compatible clinical history, the presence of specific IgE (demonstrated by positivity to realistic skin tests and serum IgE assay), and positivity on the oral food challenge test.
In clinical practice, taking into account the cashew / pistachio syndrome, when the allergy work-up for cashew is negative, allergists tend to advise to reintroduce pistachio at home, considering the two allergens as sufficiently homologous to authorize such a practice. In this context, the investigators decided to check whether this practice, which is based mainly on in vitro homologies, is risk-free, based on the clinical experience of our center.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Montpellier, France, 34295
- Uhmontpellier
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Patient evaluated at the Allergy Unit of the University Hospital of Montpellier (France)
- Suspicion of food allergy to Anacardiaceae
- Allergy work-up for cashew and pistachio including at least skin tests, and possible specific IgE and food challenge
Exclusion criteria:
- Patients included in other trials that don't allow them to be included in the present one
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
PPV and NPV
Time Frame: 1 day
|
PPV and NPV of the results of skin tests and food challenge to either cashew or pistachio to predict a concordant result for pistachio or cashew, respectively
|
1 day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Relative risk
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Finding risk factors predictive of discrepancies between the results of the allergy work-up for cashew and pistachio
|
1 day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Davide CAIMMI, University Hospital, Montpellier
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- RECHMPL20_0151
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Suspected Allergy to Anacardiaceae
-
NCT06923878Recruiting
-
NCT02884583UnknownFood Allergy Suspected | Food Allergy Proved
-
NCT02490813TerminatedAllergy to Fish | Allergy to Shrimp | Allergy to Crab
-
NCT04401631WithdrawnAllergy | Allergic Asthma | Allergy to Cats | Allergy to House Dust | Allergy Cockroach | Allergy to Dog Dander (Finding) | Allergy Mold
-
NCT04442932WithdrawnAllergy | Allergic Asthma | Allergy to Cats | Allergy to House Dust | Allergy to Dog Dander | Allergy Cockroach
-
NCT03504774TerminatedAllergy;Food | Allergy to Shrimp | Allergy to Cashew Nut (Disorder)
-
NCT01966640CompletedAllergy to Egg | Allergy to Peanut
-
NCT07396285Not yet recruitingAny Conditions That Are Genetic or Suspected to be Genetic in Origin
-
NCT04197232RecruitingSuspected Damage to Fetus From Biologic Agents
-
NCT00620880Completed