Postoperative Pain Following Restoration With Composite Resin Versus Sonic Fill
Postoperative Pain Following Restoration With Sonic Fill Versus Composite Resin in Children With Deep Carious First Permanent Molar: A Randomized Clinical Pilot Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Mennatallah S Maklad, Masters
- Phone Number: +201015556040
- Email: menna.maklad@hotmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Fatma K Abdelgawad, Professor
- Phone Number: +201006753265
- Email: fatmadent@hotmail.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Asymptomatic First Permanent Molar
- Age of the patient ranging from 6-9 years
- Normal periodontal status
- Teeth with no previous restorative treatment
- Good oral health
- Absences of pathological mobility
Exclusion Criteria:
- Adverse medical history
- Potential behavioral problems
- Parents refusing participation of their children
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Sonic Fill Restoration
Using sonic activation system turns the highly filled sonic fill composite into a flowable which enables the material to rapidly fill the cavity effortlessly- greatly reducing procedure time.
|
Kerr's Sonic Fill is the only sonic-activated, single-step, bulk-fill composite that starts out as a low-viscosity composite.
|
|
Active Comparator: Composite Resin Restoration
Direct composite restorations are the most requested and performed dental procedures.
The incremental placement technique is the gold standard for posterior universal composite placement.
|
Composite resins are polymer-based materials used in dentistry for aesthetic repairs.Polymerization is accomplished typically with a hand held curing light that emits specific wavelengths keyed to the initiator and catalyst packages involved.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The primary outcome (postoperative pain) is evaluated the following day of the treatment performed by a phone call from the outcome assessor, a week and a month after to check in any pain.
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Evaluation of Restoration (Modified USPHS Criteria)
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months
|
The secondary outcome (USPHS) is evaluated by the outcome assessor and an investigator using the given scores as follows: The modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria for retention, color matching, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, surface texture and anatomical form were used.
|
3 months, 6 months, 9 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Nevine Waly, Profesor, Cairo University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chandrasekhar V, Rudrapati L, Badami V, Tummala M. Incremental techniques in direct composite restoration. J Conserv Dent. 2017 Nov-Dec;20(6):386-391. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_157_16.
- Afifi SMH, Haridy MF, Farid MR. Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Jul 26;7(14):2335-2342. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.656. eCollection 2019 Jul 30.
- Atabek D, Aktas N, Sakaryali D, Bani M. Two-year clinical performance of sonic-resin placement system in posterior restorations. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(9):743-751. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a38855.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Composite Resin VS Sonic Fill
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.