Notation Optimization Through Template Engineering (NOTE)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
- Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Residents who had open visit slots during their outpatient clinic time
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Standard template
Usual outpatient progress note with standard Subjective Objective Assessment Plan (SOAP) format
|
Residents assigned to document with standard progress note template
|
|
Experimental: New template
The assessment and plan section is placed in the beginning, subjective data grouped into the assessment section, and elements not related to the current presentation were deemphasized
|
Residents assigned to document with new progress note template
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Note length
Time Frame: Duration of note entry, up to 2 hours
|
Note length in line count.
|
Duration of note entry, up to 2 hours
|
|
Time to note completion
Time Frame: Duration of note entry, up to 2 hours
|
Time to note completion in minutes.
|
Duration of note entry, up to 2 hours
|
|
Note evaluation by authors using a likert scale
Time Frame: Immediately after note entry, up to 1 hour
|
Likert-scale survey instrument evaluating perceived organization, structure, and efficiency of note.
|
Immediately after note entry, up to 1 hour
|
|
Note evaluation by reviewers using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument
Time Frame: Within 1 year
|
Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9) - validated note quality scale composed of 9 metrics. 1 is not at all. 5 is extremely.
|
Within 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jeremy A Epstein, MD, Johns Hopkins University
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00117171
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.