Evaluation of Quickly Diagnostic Saliva Tests for SARS-CoV-2 (EasyCoV)
Coronavirus disease 2019 or COVID-19 is a highly contagious infectious disease. Symptoms of the disease are non-specific (fever, cough, dyspnea and fatigue), common with many seasonal viruses, which complicates the diagnosis. For mild forms, which represent the vast majority of cases, hospitalization is not necessary and treatment is symptomatic. However in more severe cases, hospitalization is required and sometimes even admission to an intensive care unit.
Several diagnostic tests are already available, but they require, in all cases, the intervention of qualified health personnel to carry out the sample, which includes a risk of contagion and an expensive and time-consuming laboratory analysis and reagents. These tests are therefore not very suitable for massive screenings.
We want to evaluate the performance of a detection test performed on a salivary sample in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. This test will be non-invasive, performed without any analytical device and will restore its qualitative result "infected versus non-infected" in less than 1 hour (30min objective).
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Montpellier, France, 34295
- UCH Montpellier
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Control subjects (COV2- group): Participants ( Healthcare staff, patients and DRIVE participants) negative for SARS-CoV-2
- Infected subjects (COV2 + group): Patients diagnosed positive for SARS-CoV-2 hospital staff known to be positive and coming to do a control PCR DRIVE participants.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Eligibility Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Control subjects (COV2- group): Healthcare staff presumed and diagnosed negative for SARS-CoV-2
- Infected subjects (COV2 + group): Patients diagnosed positive for SARS-CoV-2 hospital staff known to be positive and coming to do a control PCR
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not affiliated with a French Social Security Systemscheme or equivalent system
- Persons deprived of their liberty, adult protected under guardianship or vulnerable persons
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Participants with active infection test to SARS-COV2
Sampling of saliva (1 to 2 ml)
|
Collection of 1 to 2 ml of saliva
|
|
Convalescent participants for SARS-COV2
Sampling of saliva (1 to 2 ml)
|
Collection of 1 to 2 ml of saliva
|
|
Participants cured to SARS-COV2
Sampling of saliva (1 to 2 ml)
|
Collection of 1 to 2 ml of saliva
|
|
Participants with negative test to SARS-COV2
Sampling of saliva (1 to 2 ml)
|
Collection of 1 to 2 ml of saliva
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Specific detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific RNA
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Detection by the LAMP method is to be corroborated with the reference method, RT-PCR on the same salivary sample.
Only one sample is taken per subject participating in the study.
The sample is divided into two aliquots which will be analyzed by LAMP and RT-PCR
|
1 day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Analytical sensitivity of the LAMP test.
Time Frame: 1 day
|
This test developed by SYS2DIAG / SKILLCELL must be able to detect a minimum viral load equivalent to that of the standard method on the same salivary sample.
|
1 day
|
|
The correlation between the measurement of the assayed viral load (CT value) by the standard method and by the LAMP developed by SYS2DIAG / SKILLCELL.
Time Frame: 1 day
|
A correlation between the viral loads measured on the same sample by RT-PCR and by LAMP will be carried out.
|
1 day
|
|
Evaluation of the use of saliva samples compared to nasopharyngeal samples
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The RT-PCR results on these 2 types of samples and the LAMP results for the saliva samples will be compared with the patient diagnosis to assess the feasibility and performance of the saliva samples for the molecular diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.
|
1 day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: REYNES Jacques, PU PH, Montpellier Hospital
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- RECHMPL20_0170
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.