Modified Cephalica Venous Access Port Implantation

April 16, 2020 updated by: Putu Anda Tusta Adiputra, Udayana University
As long term totally implantable central venous access (TIVAPS) was increasingly needed in cancer patient, some modified techniques were introduced to improved the outcome and safety of the port implantation. In this modified technique, the prioritization were the safety and stability of catheter and port placement. Catheter was inserted to the cephalic vein in the deltopectoral groove, in which connected to the port pocket implanted in the anteromedial thorax. Connection was done by percutaenous and Seldinger technique by introducing a special trocar to ensure safety. Long term outcome was satisfactorily good by this technique without and major and minor events.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Large studies have proved that TIVAPS was effective for long term venous access with minimal risk of complication. For TIVAPS, clinicians have approach the vena cava through the subclavian, internal jugular vein, or cephalic vein regularly with various technique. The most minimal complication risk was obtained in the access through cephalic vein.In the conventional method of cephalic central venous access approach, the incision was done at clavicular regio, with the high risk of catheter being kinking. To improve the feasibility of the techique, here, the author introduced the modified technique for cephalic vein approach.

Step 1 Preparation The patient was positioned supine with the head tilted to the left. In our procedure, the head was tilted to the left in order to expose the deltopetoral groove. The procedure was done in aseptic condition with iodine tincture and sterile draping. It was carried out under local anesthesia in an operating room. A two-gram of cephazolin was inserted intravenously following the guideline standard in the local hospital.

Step 2 Landmarks There were two landmark incision in this procedure, in which the first one is in deltopectoral groove for catheter insertion and the second is in anteromedial of thorax. The deltopectoral groove is located between the insertio of pectoralis major and deltoid muscle. The cephalic vein passes through the clavipectoral (deltopectoral) triangle to join the axillary vein. Lidocaine without adrenaline was used as a local anesthetic in both incision. The procedure was done without any radiology guidance.

Step 3 Vein identification The first incision was made for the insertion of venous catheter. As long as 2 to 3 cm incision was made in the deltopectoral groove. An incision of 3 mm in length was made on the surface of the vein. The incision was then deepened to the fascia overlying the deltoid and pectoralis muscle. Subcutaneous tissue was positioned by blunt dissection to uncover the cephalic vein. The cephalic vein was identified in the adipose tissue along the deltopectoral groove. Surgical cauterization was used to control bleeding. The proximal and distal end of the vein was secured by tying and a hemostat was applied for traction. A transverse venotomy was made at the center of these 2 sutures.

Step 4 Venous catheter insertion A peel-away sheath was inserted to facilitate the catheter insertion into the venous system. The catheter was inserted into the cephalic vein for approximately 25 centimeters.

Step 5 Port pocket incision The 3-4 cm for second incision was carried out for port pocket, with the position on anteromedial of thorax for chemoport implantation. Trocar was tunneled subcutaenously and advanced to the first incision. Catheter was trimmed and ready to be connected to the reservoir.

Step 6 Port implantation The port was inserted to the port pocket and anchored to two sites of underlying muscle in chest was using permanent monofilament suture. The implanted port was flushed with 10 ml of normal saline and 5 ml of 50 IU/ml heparin.

Step 7 Ensuring position For ensuring the catheter position, plain chest radiograph (posteroanterior view) was done.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
3

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Indonesia
    • Bali
      • Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia, 80114
        • Putu Anda Tusta Adiputra

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who are planning to receive chemotherapy and need chemoports placement.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unconsented subjects

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
OTHER: Standard procedure
For the conventional TIVAPS with cephalic vein approach, incision was made either in the midline of infraclivular or supraclavicular. Cathether was introduced to the central and then connected to the laterally implanted port in the deltopectoral region. The experience in the local center experienced several pitfalls with this method such as pneumothorax, pinch-off syndrome, compression of the catheter by the clavicle, kinking of the catheter, and loss of patencty.
Other: Modified cephalica venous access
This modified technique prioritized the safety in TIVAPS by using several modified landmarks and techniques. The catheter was inserted through cephalic vein in deltopectoral groove regio and implanted the port in the anteromedial of thorax. Generally, the percutaneous and Seldinger technique was used to ensure safety and minimal tissue disruption. To connect the trimmed catheter to port pocket, the author anchored a special trocar from anteromedial of thorax to the deltopectoral groove for guidance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patency of chemoport
Time Frame: 10 minutes after the insertion of chemoport
While flushing 10 ml of saline to chemoport, measure the velocity flow of saline injection. If the saline was complete in less than 1 minute, it was considered normal. difficulty in flushing the chemoport and pain during flushing should be considered as a failure.
10 minutes after the insertion of chemoport
location of chemoport
Time Frame: 1 hour after the insertion of chemoport.
appropriate location of chemoport can be found by thorax X Ray, confirmed by radiographers evaluation.
1 hour after the insertion of chemoport.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
complication of chemoport
Time Frame: 1 month after the insertion of chemoport
observation any sign of infection
1 month after the insertion of chemoport

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Udayana University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Putu Anda Tusta Adiputra, MD, Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Udayana University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 14, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 16, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • UdayanaU

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chemotherapy Effect

Clinical Trials on Modified cephalica venous access

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings